Page 1 of 3

ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:24 pm
by ALBPelasgian
Meqe faqet ku kane qene te postuara shkrimet dhe te dhenat e ketij dijetari jane defunksionalizuar (mbase shkaku i ndonje sulmi hakeresh grek apo serb). Duke kerkuar gjithandej gjeta nje arkiv webesh ku fatmiresisht artikujt e tij ishin te ruajtur per mrekulli. Ndaj e shoh te udhes qe per cdo siguri t'i postoj ketu ne forumin tone qe te jene te lexueshme nga te gjithe por edhe te jene me te sigurta.

Image

Albanian is the only Indo European language that has preserved the archaic structure of proto Aryan language. Albanian adjectives and ordinals come after the stressed nouns.
The law formulated in 1892 by J. Wackernagel, according to which unstressed parts of the sentence tend to occupy a position after the first stressed word normally situated at the beginning of a sentence qualifies Albanian as the oldest living Indo European language.
Ja dhe permbajtja e artikujve:

Trojan Leaders - List Of Illyrian Tribes - Illyrian Language - Hittite King List - Assyrian King List - Sumerian King List - When The King Became A God - Illyrian King List - Albanian An Illyrian Dialect - Mythological Stories - Origin Of Racism In Europe - Illyrian Altaic Concordances - Guide To Ied - Caucasian Albanians Versus Illyrian Albanians - The Origin Of The Serb People - Ila Varta The Homeland Of Illyrians - An Older Version Of Odysseus - The Meaning Of Iliad - Who Was Homer - Origin of Hellenic Greeks - The Indo European Etymological Dictionary - Indo-European Phonetic System - Turkish Loanwords In Albanian - Albanian Tocharian B Glossary

Burimi: http://web.archive.org/web/200711061054 ... oillyrian/

Lexim te kendshem!

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:26 pm
by ALBPelasgian
ILLYRIAN ALTAIC CONCORDANCES


Although there are no similarities between Avars and Albanians there have been a lot of exchanges among Altaic languages and Illyrians. Although there is no clear evidence of a common ancestry, Aryan and Altaic languages share a great deal of cognates. The most spectacular similarity is the root/lemma *alpho- `white'

Root / lemma: albho- (*helba-)
Meaning: white, *precious, bright metal
German meaning: `weiß'
Comments:
Because of the common gr. - celt. kʷ > p, gʷ > b, the original root was actually *alkʷha- `white'. From the same old root *alkʷh- `white' derived Root / lemma: algh- (*helgh-): `frost, cold' and Root / lemma: algʷh- : `to earn, price, value, *precious, bright metal': Old Indian árhati ` is worth, earns, is obliged, debit ', arghá-ḥ ` value, validity, price ' (=osset. arɣ ` price, value '), av. arǝjaiti ` is worth, amounts for value ' (npers. arzīdan ` earn '), arǝjah- (es- stem) n. ` value, price '.
But gr. is the only IE tongue to preserve the old laryngeal he-.
Material:
Maybe alb. geg. alka, alkë ` white cream, wool' fat '
Note:
Alb. is the only IE tongue that has preserved the archaic *alkʷha- `white' root.
Gr. ἀλφός ` white rash ', ἀλφούς λευκούς Hes. (also ἀλωφός λευκός Hes., s. below), FlN ᾽Αλφειός;
lat. albus ` white, dead white; hence pale or bright; sometimes making bright; fig., fortunate ', umbr. alfu ` white ', osk. Alafaternum Alafaternum `Alfaternorum', prälig. Alafis ` Albius' (and many other names partly Etruscan coinage due to osk.-umbr. root alf-, as lat. alb-, s. Schulze Lat. Eig. 119 f.; etr. Pronunciation from lat. albus also must be that of Paul. Diac. 4 L. as Sabine called alpum); in addition albula, alburnus ` whitefish ', albarus ` white poplar ', albūcus ` asphodel plant ' etc.;
cymr. elfydd m. ` earth, world ' from *albíi̯o- (compare aksl. světъ ` light, world ');
ahd. albiz, elbiz, ags. aelbitu, ielfetu, anord. elptr, ǫlpt f. (germ. *alƀ-it-, -ut-) `swan', (forms -d- in animal names: s. Brugmann Grdr. II2 1, 467, Charpentier KZ. 40, 433 f., Specht Dekl. 229; also:) aksl. lebedь, russ. lebedь lebjadь, in the ablaut to poln. ɫabędź, serb. lȁbud, čech. labud' ` swan ' (ursl. *olb-edь, -ędь, -ǫdь, compare to the latter suffix form lit. bal-añdis ` pigeon, dove ', actually ` white ';
see Meillet Et. 322, MSL. 14, 377, Schulze SBprAk. 1910, 800 = Kl. Schr. 122 f.; named after the color russ. lebedá, poln. lebioda, ɫoboda ` atriplex ', Lidén Stud. 97); ndl. alft, elft `whitefish' (formally = ahd. etc albiz `swan'; to loanword from lat. albula `whitish' in contrast to it Falk-Torp 189 f. are against, mhd. albel 'whitefish', nhd. Albe, nd. alf, albe 'whitefish'), compare lat. alburnus ds .;
Maybe lat. albulus -a -um `whitish; f. as subst. Albula -ae (sc. aqua), old name of the Tiber'.
nhd mdartl. Albums ` hard sand under the fertile earth ', schwed. mdartl. alf ds .;
probably also anord. alfr, ags. ælf, engl. elf (from which nhd. Elf m., Elfe f. borrowed), mnd. alf ` Аlp, grand, evil spirit ', mhd. nhd. Alp, Pl. the Alben (originally probably ` whitish nebulous figures '), as well as ahd. alba ` insect larva, locusta quae nondum volavit ', ndl. elften f. Pl. ` cock chafer grubs ', norw. alma ds. (m from the Gen. Pl. *albna, from which *almna).
Comments:
The Illyr. TN Albanoi is the plural form mhd. nhd. Alp, Pl. the Alben (originally probably ` whitish nebulous figures ') a primitive Indo European people who believed in evil spirits before an elaborate mythology developed later.
Arbën `name of alb. during Middle Ages'
see to these germ. words esp. Falk-Torp under aame (4, 1428), al (19, 1431), alv (22, 1431), elv I (188 f., 1454), emd (189, 1454); as ` white water ' also the name of Elbe (lat. Albis, Albia, from germ. *Alƀī, Gen. Alƀiōz =), anord. elfr ` river ' and river name (in addition probably also mnd. elve ` riverbed '), compare gall. FlN Albis, Albā (now Aube; contrast Dubis, Dubā, i.e. ` Black water '), lat. Albula, gr. ᾽Αλφειός (see esp. Schulze SBprAk.1910, 797 = Kl. Schr. 120).
In contrast to this assumption, it is doubtful from or in which circumference names like gall.-lat. Albiōn, mir. Albbu, Gen. Albban (stem *Alb-i̯en-) 'Britain' (to cymr. elfydd or from the white chalk rocks), lat. Alpēs, ῎Αλπεις (alti montes?) and in ital., ligur. and kelt. Areas frequent local name like Alba, Albium below likewise on the concept ' white ' go back or, however, are not idg. derivation (Bertoldi BSL. 32, 148, ZrP. 56, 179 f.).
Arm. aɫauni ` pigeon, dove ', barely for *alabh-n- (Bugge KZ. 32, 1, Pedersen KZ. 38, 313), see below. About the affiliation of *albhi- *albhi- ` barley ' s. d.
Maybe here belongs Hett. al-pa-áš (alpas) ` cloud ' in spite of Couvreur (H ̯ 106, 149) here.
To the ablaut: beside *albho-s seems to be two-syllable root form in gr. ἀλωφός (also ἐλεφιτίς?) and arm. aɫauni, and in addition tuned slav. intonation (serb. lȁbūd), s. Osthoff IF. 8, 64 f., Pedersen aaO.
This additional -bho- one syllable is in color names frequent suffix (e.g. lat. galbus lit. raĩbas 'in different colors, multicolored, dappled ' beside raĩnas; Brugmann Grdr. II2 1, 388 f), *albhos is obtainable in monosyllabic root *al- and on the other hand ἀλωφός is possible according to Brugmann aaO.
to lit. al̃vas ` tin ' (` white metal '), apr. alwis `lead, plumbum', russ. ólovo `tin' (from idg. *alǝu̯o-? Balt. correspondences are borrowed according to Niedermann from the Slav.) stand in a similar relation, as gr. κορω-νός to lat. curv-us, Old Indian palā-la-ḥ (: palāv-aḥ) to apr. pelwo, also go back to a word root *alō-: *alǝu-: *alu- (in arm. aɫawni and slav. words);
Note:
From Baltic languages the notion for `white metals, white color, sick white' passed to Altaic family:
Protoform: *ni̯ā̀lpá
Meaning: tin, lead
Tungus protoform: *ńālban
Japanese protoform: *nàmári
Comments: An interesting TM-Jpn. isogloss; cf. also Old Koguryo *naimul (see Miller 1979, 8). Jpn. *nàmá-ri < *nàpan-(r)i, with usual regressive nasalization.
Earlier:
Protoform: *ălpa
Meaning: unable, sick; being at service, man-at-arms
Turkic protoform: *ălp-
Mongolian protoform: *alba-n
Tungus protoform: *alba-
Korean protoform: *àrphằ-
Japanese protoform: *apar-
Comments: Poppe 85, 121 (Turk-Mong.); TMN 2, 110-111.
gr. ἐλεφιτίς is sufficient by the reshuffle to which animal names and plant names are exposed everywhere, in order to ensure in addition still *ale-bh-;
here as ` the shining one ' gall. alausa ` European shad, twaite shad ' (frz. alose, span. alosa), compare also gall. GN Alaunos, Alounae, brit. FlN Alaunos (nengl. Aln), cymr. PN Alun as well as arm. aɫauni ` pigeon, dove ' from *alǝu-n-.
A stem form ali- ` white ' is not provabe, in spite of Specht Dekl. 114, because hett. ali- ` white ' appears very uncertain (Couvreur H̯ 149 f., Friedrich IF. 58, 94) and gr. ἀλίφαλος, ἀλίφατα, ἄλiξ are to be explained differently.
Here, however, probably (as a `pale yellow plant ') hisp.-lat. ala `inula, Alant' (Isid.), span.-portug. ala ds., furthermore with -nt-suffix ahd. alant ds., with it etymological identically the fish name ahd. alunt (newer alant), as. alund ` whitefish, Alant ' = (with gramm. alteration) aisl. -ǫlunn ` a fish ', idg. Basic form *al-n̥t-/*al-ont-. The original meaning of al- is probably` white, shining ', hence, then also 'pale yellow' etc.

Turkic etymology :
Protoform: *ălp

Meaning: 1 difficult, hard 2 warrior 3 hero 4 brave 5 giant 6 landlord
Old Turkic: alp 1, 2, 4 (Orkh., Yen., OUygh.); alp-a-ɣut 2 (OUygh.).
Karakhanid: alp 2, 4 (MK, KB, Tefs., IM); alpaɣut 2 (MK)
Middle Turkic: alp 2, 3 (Sngl).
Turkish: alp 3, 4
Tatar: alɨp 3, 5, alpawɨt 2
Kirghiz: alp 3, 4, 5, albūt 'hot-tempered'
Kazakh: alɨp 5, albɨt, albɨrt 'hot-tempered'
Karakalpak: alp 3, 5, albɨra- 'be exhausted, embarassed'
Uzbek: alp 3
Uighur: alpawut 2
Bashkir: alpawɨt 2, alpamɨša 5 (from Alp Amɨša, a folklore name, = Tat.)
Khakassian: alɨp 4, albɨx- 'to act as a meddler'
Altai: alɨp 4
Shor: alɨp 4
Chuvash: olъp 5, olbut 2
Yakut: alɨp 'witchcraft; part of some names of spirits'
Comments: EDT 127-128, VEWT 18, ЭСТЯ I 139, Федотов 2, 276. Clauson's hypothesis that the reflexes of *alpawut in recent languages are the result of a re-borrowing from Mong. (cf. Lit. Mong. albaɣut (Kow. 84) < Turk.), partly contaminated with Mong. alban 'tax', is unnecessary: a semantic shift 'warrior' > 'gentry' > 'landlord' seems to be natural. Cf. a borrowing from Mong. alba-tu in Tuva, Oyr. albatu, albatɨ, Kirgh. albatɨ 'tax-payers, people'.

Mongolian etymology :
Protoform: *alba-n
Meaning: 1 compulsion, forcing 2 to force 3 service, duty
Written Mongolian: alba(n) 1, 3 (L 27)
Middle Mongolian: alban 3 (HYt)
Khalkha: alba 3, alba-da- 2
Buriat: alba(n) 3, alba-da- 2
Kalmuck: alwǝ, alwṇ 1, 3
Ordos: alba 3, alba-da- 2, to take a tribute
Monguor: arwan 3 (SM 15), alwan (MGCD)
Dagur: alba 3 (Тод. Даг. 119), alebe 3 (MD 112)
Comments: KW 9, MGCD 101. Mong. > Shor alban etc. (VEWT 16, Щербак 1997, 199); > Man. alban etc. (Doerfer MT 116, Rozycki 15), Russ. dial. albán, Oyr. alman > Russ. Siber. almán (Аникин 81, 83).

Tungus etymology :
Protoform: *alba-
Meaning: 1 to be unable 2 lazy
Evenki: alba- 1
Even: albъ̣- 1
Negidal: alba- 1
Nanai: albaqto 2
Orok: alba- 1
Comments: ТМС 1, 30.

Korean etymology :

Protoform: *àrphằ-
Meaning: to be ill
Modern Korean: aphɨ-
Middle Korean: àrphằ-
Comments: Nam 347, KED 1078.

Japanese etymology :
Protoform: *apar-
Meaning: to pity
Old Japanese: apare-m-
Tokyo: awaré-m-
Kyoto: áwáré-m-
Kagoshima: àwàrè-m-
Comments: JLTT 388, 679. The accent situation is not quite clear: modern dialects rather uniformly point to low tone (also in the noun *apara-i 'sympathy, pity' > Tokyo áware, Kyoto áwàrè, Kagoshima awaré); but the only accentuation attested in RJ is ápáre-b-.

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:27 pm
by ALBPelasgian
TROJAN LEADERS

In its resistance against the Achaean invaders, the city of Troy was assisted by a number of allies, coming mainly from different parts of Asia Minor and the Balkans. The list below shows all commanders on the Trojan side.


Acamas 2
leader of Thracians
Acamas 2 was son of Eusorus. Ares assumed once the shape of this Thracian leader in order to exhort the Trojans against the Achaeans. Acamas 2 was killed by Ajax 1.

Acamas 3
leader of Thracians
Thrace is the region between the Black and Aegean seas.
[Hom.Il.5.460ff., 6.5.ff.]

Adrastus 3
leader of Dardanians

Acamas 3
Acamas 3 was a lieutenant of Aeneas and served in his company together with Archelochus. Acamas 3 was son of the Trojan Elder Antenor 1, who was known for advocating for peace. According to some Acamas 3 was killed by Meriones from Crete, but others say that it was Philoctetes who killed him.

Aeneas
Leader of Dardanians
Dardania is a region about Troy.
[Hom.Il.5.70, 12.100, 16.342ff.; QS.10.168.]

Adrastians
Adrastus 3 is son of the seer Merops 1, who had tried to dissuade his son from risking their lives in the Trojan War. During the war he was captured alive by Menelaus to whom he said that his father, being a wealthy man, would pay for him a rich ransom. He was killed by Agamemnon or perhaps by Diomedes 2.

Amphimachus 3
Leader of Adrastians
Adrastia is the region on the European coast of the Hellespont near its entrance to the Propontis.
[Hom.Il.6.37ff., 2.830, 11.328.]

Amphius 1
Leader of Dardanians

Antiphus 4
Leader of Carians
Son of Nomion 2 and brother of Nastes. Either he or his brother Nastes was killed by Achilles.

Archelochus
Caria is the southwestern region of Asia Minor.
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.2.871.]

Ascanius 3
Adrastians
Brother of Adrastus 3 [see above]. He was killed by Diomedes 2.

Asius 1
Maeonians
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.2.672, 2.830.]

Chromius 2
Maeonia is a region in Lydia about Mount Tmolos in Asia Minor.
Son of Talaemenes and a Gygaean Nymph. Antiphus 4 is brother of Mesthles [see below].

Ennomus 1
Leader of Dardanians
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.2.864.]

Epistrophus 2
Leader of Phrygians

Archelochus, son of Antenor 1, served in the same company as Aeneas and Acamas 3. He was killed by Ajax 1.

Euphemus 2
Leader of People of Phrygia.
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.5.70, 12.100, 14.465ff.]

Eurypylus 6
Leader of Percotians
Son of Aretaon and brother of Phorcys 1.

Glaucus 3
Percote is a city in the Troad opposite the Thracian Chersonesus.
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.]

Hector 1
Leader of Mysians

Asius 1, called Phrygian leader, served in the same company as Helenus 1 and Deiphobus 1, sons of King Priam 1 of Troy. Asius 1 was the son of Hyrtacus and Arisbe, Priam 1's first wife. Asius 1's son Adamas was killed by Meriones during the war. His other son Phaenops 3 came from Abydus, a city in the Troad, and was one of Hector 1's dearest guest-friends. When Apollo once addressed Hector 1 he took the shape of Phaenops 3. Asius 1 was killed by King Idomeneus 1 of Crete.

Mysia is called the northwestern part of Asia Minor.
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.12.94, 12.140, 13.384ff., 13.570ff., 17.582.]

Hippothous 5
Leader of Mysians

Chromius 2 or Chromis 4 was son of Arsinous 1 and brother of Ennomus 1. He was killed by Odysseus.

Memnon
Leader of Alizonians
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.5.677; Ov.Met.13.257.]

The Alizonians were Trojan allies, inhabiting the Troad.
A seer, son of Arsinous 1 and brother of Chromius 2. He was killed by Odysseus.

Mesthles
Leader of Ciconians
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.2.858; Ov.Met.13.260.]

Nastes
Leader of Mysians

Epistrophus 2 has been called leader of the Alizonians and of the AMAZONS. He was son of Mecisteus 3 and brother of Odius 1. Epistrophus 2 was killed by Achilles.
Odius 1
Leader of Lycians
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Strab.12.3.22, 13.1.7, 13.1.61.]

Pandarus 1
Lycia is a region on the southern coast of Asia Minor east of Caria.
Son of Troezenus, son of Ceas. His death has not been reported.

Peirous
Leader of Trojans
[Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; Hom.Il.2.846.]

Penthesilia
Leader of People from Troy.
Eurypylus 6 is son of Telephus, son of Heracles 1 and Auge 2, the daughter of Aleus, son of Aphidas 1, son of Arcas 1, son of Zeus and Callisto. Eurypylus 6's mother has been called Laodice 3, Argiope 4 and Astyoche 4. Laodice 3 was daughter of King Priam 1 of Troy. Argiope 4 was daughter of Teuthras 1, prince of Teuthrania, a region near Mysia. Astyoche 4 was daughter of King Laomedon 1 of Troy, that is, sister of Priam 1. Eurypylus 6 was killed by Neoptolemus.

Pelasgians
[Apd.Ep.5.12; Dio.4.33.12; Hom.Od.11.519; Hyg.Fab.112; QS.6.120, 6.136, 8.200; Strab.13.1.7, 13.1.69.]

Phorcys 1
Aboriginal people, inhabitants of Greece
This is the man who is remembered for having exchanged his golden armour for that of Diomedes 2, which was made of bronze. He was son of Hippolochus 1, son of Bellerophon. Glaucus 3 was killed by Ajax 1.

Pylaemenes 1
Ethiopians
[Hdt.1.147; Hom.Il.6.232; Apd.Ep.3.34ff.; QS.3.278.]

Pylaeus
Ethiopia is the land south of Egypt, but Western and Eastern Ethiopians must be distinguished since Memnon conquered the East.


Troia
(Troia). The name of the city of Troy or Ilium; also applied to the country. The mythical account of the kingdom of Troy is briefly as follows. Teucer, the first king, had a daughter who married Dardanus, the chieftain of the country northeast of the Troad (Dardania). Dardanus had two sons, Ilus and Ericthonius, and the latter was the father of Tros, from whom the country and people derived the names of Troas and Troes. Tros was the father of Ilus, who founded the city, which was called after him Ilium, and also, after his father, Troia. The next king was Laomedon, and after him Priam. (See Priamus.) In his reign the city was taken and destroyed by the confederated Greeks, after a ten years' siege. (For details see Achilles; Aeneas; Agamemnon; Aiax; Hector; Helena; Neoptolemus; Odysseus; Paris; and especially Trojan War.) As to the historical facts which may be regarded as established, there is evidence of a considerable city having been sacked and burned at a period which archæologists put not later than the twelfth century B.C. That this invasion may have been an enterprise of the Achaeans at that time is neither impossible nor unlikely. If the interpretation of recent Egyptian discoveries is right which makes Achaeans appear as assailants of Egypt in the reign of Rameses III., it would follow that the Achaeans of the twelfth or thirteenth century had power and spirit enough for such an enterprise; but in any case the history of Tiryns and Mycenae, as attested by their ruins, is evidence to the existence of their power at that time. There is therefore no reason why the traditions upon which the Iliad is based should not be regarded as true in their main outlines. It is probable enough that to avenge an act of piracy (which is a common and simple explanation of the rape of Helen) the Greeks of the “Achaean” period besieged and sacked Troy and thence returned to hold their own possessions undisturbed until the Dorian invasion. That there was no Greek settlement upon the site of Troy until a much later period is deduced from the remains of towns of a low state of civilization and of small importance which have been discovered above the ruins of the second city. On the literary use made of the legend of the Trojan War, see Cyclic Poets; Homerus; Vergilius.
HISTORY OF TROY


Troy is a Phrygian city in northwestern Asia Minor in the region called the Troad, and Trojan are called its citizens. Otherwise, this town has also been called Ilium, Ilion, or Ilios. At the time of the Trojan War, Troy was a well-walled city with broad streets and beautiful palaces. Many Asian allies, among which the Ascanians, the AMAZONS, the Lycians, and the Eastern Ethiopians, came with their armies to help the besieged city.
Dardanus 1, son of Zeus and the Pleiad Electra 3 lived in Samothrace, but when his brother Iasion [see Demeter], who was among the most handsome, was killed by Zeus with a thunderbolt because of his love affair with Demeter, he left the island, and coming to the opposite mainland he settled in the territory, which at the time was ruled by Teucer 2.

Emigration of Dardanus 1
Some say that this emigration took place because life in Samothrace, with its poor soil and boisterous sea, was hard for Dardanus 1 and his people. So sailing from the island, he came to the strait called the Hellespont, and settled in the region which afterwards was called Phrygia.

The Teucrians
Teucer 2, son of the river god Scamander 1 and the nymph Idaea 1, was then king of that country, and the people were called Teucrians after him. King Teucer 2 welcomed the foreigner, and gave him his daughter Batia 1 as wife, and along with her, a share of his land. Those who are interested in proving that the Trojans were Greeks affirm that Teucer 2 had himself emigrated from Attica, and that the reason why he received Dardanus 1 with generous hospitality is that he was glad to see arrive new Greek colonists to this land which had but a small native population, and that he believed Dardanus 1 would assist him in his wars against the barbarians.

Dardania
Dardanus 1 founded a city in the region that later was called the Troad, and lived there with his family until the death of his father-in-law, upon which he became king of the whole land and called it Dardania after himself.

Family of Dardanus 1
According to some, Batia 1 was Dardanus 1's second wife, whom he married after the death of his first wife Chryse 3. His sons by her were Idaeus 4 and Deimas. The latter stayed in Arcadia, whence they come (as it is said that Atlas was king of Arcadia), but Idaeus 4 emigrated with Dardanus 1, first to Samothrace, and later to Phrygia, where Mount Ida was called after him
Erichthonius 1 and Tros 1 When Dardanus 1 died, his son Erichthonius 1 became king of the Dardanians and the richest of men, as he inherited both the kingdom of his father, and that of his maternal grandfather. Erichthonius 1 married Astyoche 3 (daughter of the river god Simois), or as others say, Callirrhoe 3, a sister of Teucer 2. By one of them he had a son Tros 1, who after coming to the throne, called the people Trojans, and the land Troad after himself. According to some, it was Tros 1 who married Callirrhoe 3, but some assert that he married Acallaris, daughter of Eumedes 6.


Ilus 2
The founder of Troy Ilus 2, son of Tros 1, founded the city of Ilium (Troy) that he called after himself. Ilus 2 went to Phrygia, and taking part in games that at the time were held by the king, he won a victory in wrestling. As a prize, he received fifty youths and as many maidens, and the king, obeying an oracle, gave him also a cow, and asked him to found a city wherever the cow should lie down. The cow rested in the hill of Ate, and in that spot Ilus 2 built the city which he called Ilium. Then he prayed to Zeus that a sign might be shown to him, and he saw the Palladium fallen from heaven and lying before his tent. Ilus 2 was then blinded, for the Palladium might not be looked upon by any man. But later, when he had made offerings to the goddess, he recovered his sight.

Division of the kingdom
In this way, the kingdom of Dardanus 1 and Erichthonius 1 was divided, because while Ilus 2 became king of Ilium (Troy), his brother Assaracus continued to be king of the Dardanians.
Tricky Laomedon 1 According to some, Ilus 2's wife was Eurydice 6, and according to others Leucippe 5. By either of them Ilus 2 had a son Laomedon 1, who became king of Troy after him.

First war against Troy
When Laomedon 1 was king of Troy, Apollo and Poseidon decided to put him to the test. Assuming the likeness of mortal men, the two gods undertook to fortify Troy for wages. But when the work was done, King Laomedon 1 would not pay their wages. So Apollo sent a pestilence, and Poseidon sent a sea-monster that snatched away the people of the plain. The oracles foretold deliverance from these calamities if Laomedon 1 would expose his daughter Hesione 2 to be devoured by the sea-monster. So he, more obedient of this oracle than of his agreement with the gods, exposed Hesione 2 to the monster by fastening her to the rocks near the sea. When Heracles 1 saw her exposed, he promised to save her on condition of receiving from Laomedon 1 the mares which Zeus had given in compensation for the rape of Ganymedes. Once again Laomedon 1 promised to pay for the service, and Heracles 1 killed the monster and saved Hesione 2. But when this was accomplished, Laomedon 1 would not give the agreed reward.

How do we know whether Troy is mentioned in the Hittite texts?

As Troy is an important regional centre, located at the edge of the Hittite Empire, it seemed likely that there would be references to Troy in the Hittite archives. Wilusa, referred to in the Hittite tablets as the name of a kingdom in western Anatolia, was the ancient Anatolian name for Troy. However, the tablets themselves give no clear indication of where Wilusa was situated geographically and so the connection could not be proved.
However in recent years a series of breakthroughs and inspired detective work have enabled scholars to establish the Hittite geography and the location of Wilusa.
Seven years ago Professor David Hawkins of the School of Oriental and African Studies in London made an important breakthrough. In the Karabel pass which takes the road from Ephesus to Sardis over the Imolus range, not far from the modern Turkish city of Izmir, there's an ancient sculpture of an armed human figure cut into the rock.
However, no one knew what it meant, because until Hawkins' breakthrough, no-one had been able to decipher the inscription associated with the sculpture. Hawkins' translation identified the human figure as the king of a powerful western country called Mira.
The sculpture probably marked Mira's northern frontier with another kingdom called the Seha River Land. We now know that this kingdom extended north from the Karabel pass towards the northwest corner of Anatolia. When taken in conjunction with a letter, this new information helped scholars to locate the kingdom of Wilusa.
The letter was written by a king of the Seha River Land called Manapa-Tarhunda to his Hittite overlord. It describes how a notorious local trouble maker called Piyamaradu has attacked Wilusa. The Hittite king orders Manapa-Tarhunda to drive Piyamaradu out, but he fails dismally and the Hittites send out an expeditionary force to do the job themselves. Before reaching Wilusa, the Hittite force arrives first in the Seha River Land and from there march directly into Wilusa.
This leads to the inescapable conclusion that there is only one possible location for Wilusa - in the far Northwest corner of Turkey, the precise location of the site of Troy. It seems likely that Wilusa and Troy are one and the same.

Are the Greeks mentioned in the Hittite texts?

As well as a number of kingdoms that can be placed in Western Anatolia, the texts also make reference to the land of Ahhiyawa. Professor David Hawkins says that Ahhiyawa is associated with boats, islands and phrases like across the sea. The geography of western Anatolia as now established leaves no space on the Turkish mainland for the great kingdom of Ahhiyawa. Scholars have therefore suggested that Ahhiyawa is the Hittite name for Mycenaean Greece.
What can the Hittite texts and archaeology tell us about Troy and the story of the Trojan War?
In general the texts suggest that certain Mycenean kings and their allies became politically and militarily involved on the Western Anatolian coast during the Late Bronze Age. Moreover, there are six references to Wilusa in the Hittite texts a number of which suggest conflict over the site. In particular, a letter attributed to the Hittite King Hattusilli III, dated to around 1250 BC and written to the Mycenean or Ahhiyawan King, refers to former hostilities between the Hittites and the Ahhiyawans over Wilusa, which have now been discontinued in favour of peace.
"Now as we have come to an agreement on Wilusa over which we went to war" Tawagalawa Letter, c1250 BC
This text, says Bryce, gives us a firm contemporary, historical reference for a war involving Mycenaean Greeks, Trojans and Hittites.
However, Prof. Hawkins urges caution. Although excavations at Troy have revealed three destruction horizons at around 1300, 1200 and 1100BC, it is not easy to identify these with any known historical events mentioned in the Hittite texts.
While it is difficult to identify any specific event in either the archaeological record or the Hittite archives that corresponds directly to Homer's Trojan War, we may now be closer than ever to establishing a historical context behind Homer's epic tale.

Are the Illyrians mentioned in the Hittite texts?

Homeric songs describe innumerous Balkan tribes who defended Wilusa (Ilios) from Ahhiyawa (Achaeans). Therefore Illyrians might have been named not according to their ethic makeup or linguistic background but according to the side they took in the Trojan War. The name Illyrus derived from Illyssus since in Greek and Latin languages -s- > -r- is a common phonetic mutation. Hence the name Illyrus (Wilusa) could mean the founder of Ilios. Various Greek gods in Iliad can be explained through the inherited Indo European words of Albanian (Illyrian) language. Therefore Greeks translated Iliad from Illyrian sources while Illyrians must copied their texts from the Hittites.



The most interesting discovery of the comparative etymology is the origin of Troy. Troy was built by Dardanus. According to Greeks Dardanus was the son of Zeus and Electra. He sailed from Samothrace (meaning 'the only Thrace') to Troas in a raft made of hides. He eventually married Batea, the daughter of King Teucer, who gave him land near Abydos. There he founded the city of Dardania (the later, ill-fated city of Troy).
Actually the name Dardanus derived from the Illyrian tribe called Dardanians. But who were Illyrians? What was their language like? Illyrians were those blue-eyed, fair-haired Aryans who entered India and named the land they discovered as the land of the Dardania.
Dards, Dardistan, and Dardic
Greek and Roman References
In a well-known and much repeated story, Herodotus (4th century B.C.) mentions a war-like people on the frontier of India, near to whom are found gold-digging ants. Herodotus provides the name Dadikai for one of the groups living on India's frontier, which was then the seventh satrapy of the Achaemenian empire. Writing much later, Strabo (64 B.C. to A.D. 23) and Pliny (A.D. 23 to A.D. 79) repeat Herodotus' story and name the war-like people Dardae. Alexander, whose travels provide much of the data for classical geography of India, apparently did not meet any Dard people, but he did go to a place called Daedala. Curtius reports Alexander fought against people called Assakenoi in Daedala. Tucci assumes the Assakenoi were a Scythican tribe whose name derives from the word for horse (Tucci 1977:29). Herodotus' Dadikai may be the Persian name for the darada given in the Puranic lists, which Strabo and Pliny applied to the war-like people whom they equated with Curtius' Assakenoi. Hence, Herodutus' original citation appears to have been derived from Puranic sources. Finally, Ptolemy gives us a map that shows the Indus River arising in the country of the daradrai (map in McCrindle 1885), a term that appears to be received from Sanskrit epic and Puranic sources.

Sanskrit Epic and Puranic References
These Sanskrit references to Daradas, although they cannot be assigned any historicity, indicate that the Darada were known to those familiar with such texts. Singh cites references in the Vayu, Brahmanda, Markandeya, Vamana, and Padma Puranas (Singh 1972). Daradas are also mentioned in the Brhatsamhita, and in Manu, where they are classified pejoratively as Mlecchas. Mahabharata refers to them as degraded Kshatriyas (XII 35, 17-8 in Singh 1972). Rather than a specific people, the term Dard may have been used to characterize a fierce people, residing in the northwest, outside the boundaries of civilization. Their land is near to the "Strirajaya", the Country of Women. These fantastic and vaguely defined regions and the people who lived in them belong as much to the mythic landscape of ancient India as to the historiographic. David White, in discussing the European, Chinese, and Indian traditions regarding these people, points out that "they are a negativity, a blank space on the fringes of the conceptual map of these traditions' self-centered universes" (White 1991:117).

Epigraphic References
Three inscriptions on rocks along the Indus and Gilgit Rivers in the southern reaches of the Karakoram provide the earliest epigraphic references to Dard kings. One is found on rocks where the present-day road between Gilgit and Skardu crosses the Gilgit River, over a bridge known as the Alam bridge, now called the Farhad bridge. The inscription is in poor Kharosthi, and Fussman has read "daradaraya", meaning "King of the Dards" (Fussman 1978:1-6). The second inscription is found at Chilas Terrace, near to Chilas village along the Indus River, south of the junction of the Gilgit River and the Indus River. It has been discussed by Dani (1983) and more recently by Hinuber (1989). It is in Brahmi script. Hinuber publishes a transliteration srir daranmaharajavaisrava, which he interprets as daran-maharaja "great king of the Dards" (1989:57-8). A third inscription is immediately below the Thalpan bridge over the Indus River on the Thalpan side of the bridge. It is also in Brahmi script. Hinuber publishes a transliteration of daratsu maharaja sri vaisravanasena ssatrudamanah, which he translates as "The glorious Vaisravanasena, the subduer of enemies, great King in the land of the Dards" (1989:59). Hinuber interprets these Brahmi inscriptions as referring to the same king Vaiaravanasena, and dates them to the 4th or 5th centuries A.D. He remarks that this king "is the second oldest king of the Dards known by name, preceded only by the daradaraya mentioned at Alam bridge in a Kharosthi inscription" (1989:59). These inscriptions appear to be the only known self-reference to a Dard people.

The origin of the name Dardanus
Root / lemma: der-, heavy basis derǝ-, drē-
Meaning: to cut, split, skin (*the tree)
German meaning: `schinden, die Haut abziehen, abspalten, spalten'
Comments:
Root / lemma: der-, heavy basis derǝ-, drē- : `to cut, split, skin (*the tree)' derived from Root / lemma: deru-, dō̆ru-, dr(e)u-, drou-; dreu̯ǝ- : drū- : `tree'
Material: Old Indian dar- `break, make crack, split, burst ', present the light basis dárṣ̌i, adar, dárt, n-present the heavy basis dr̥ṇā́ti ` bursts, cracks', Opt. dr̥ṇīyā́t, Perf. dadā́ra, participle dr̥ṭa-, of the heavy basis dīrṇá-, Kaus. dā̆rayati, Intens. dardirat, dárdarti (compare av. darǝdar- `split'; čech. drdám, drdati `pluck, pick off, remove'), dardarīti `split up', dara-ḥ m., darī f. `hole in the earth, cave' (: gr. δορός `hose', lett. nuõdaras `dross of bast', ksl. razdorъ), dŕ̥ṭi-ḥ m. `bag, hose' (= gr. δάρσις, got. gataúrÞs, russ. dertь), darmán- m. ` smasher ' (: gr. δέρμα n.), next to which from the heavy basis dárīman- `destruction'; -dāri- `splitting' (= gr. δῆρις), dāra- m. `crack, col, gap, hole', dāraka- `ripping, splitting', darī- in dardarī-ti, darī-man- with ī for i = ǝ (compare Wackernagel Old Indian Gr. 1 20), barely after Persson Beitr. 779 of the i-basis; npers. Inf. dirīδan, darīδan, jüd.-pers. darīn-išn;
Maybe alb. (*dāras) dërrasë `board, plank (cut wood)', dërrmonj `destroy, break, exhaust, tire'.
Dardani illyr. TN
Note:
The name Dardani illyr. TN and [Latin transcription: Dōrieĩs] Greek: Δωριει̃ς, att. -ιη̃ς derive from the same root.

DARA
DARA (Dara, Ptol. vi. 8. § 4). 1. A small river of Carmania, at no great distance from the frontier of Persis. There can be little doubt that it is the same as the Dora of Marcian (Peripl. p. 21) and the Daras of Pliny (vi. 25. s. 28). Dr. Vincent conjectures (Voyage of Nearchus, vol. i. p. 372) that it is the same as the Dara-bin or Derra-bin of modern charts.

2. A city in Parthia. [APAVARCTICENE]

3. A city in Mesopotamia. [DARAS] [V.]

DARADAE
DARADAE the name of Ethiopian tribes in two different parts of Africa; one about the central part, in Darfour (Daradôn ethnos, Ptol. iv. 7. § 35), the other in the W., on the river DARADUS also called Aethiopes Daratitae. (Polyb. ap Plin. v. 1; Agathem. ii. 5.) [P. S.]

DARADAX
DARADAX (Daradax), a Syrian river, mentioned only by Xenophon (Anab. i. 4. § 10). It has been identified with the Far, a small tributary of the Euphrates. At the source of the river was a palace of Belesis, then satrap of Syria, with a large and beautiful park, which were destroyed by Cyrus the Younger. (Anab. l. c.) [G.W.]

DARADUS
DARADUS, DARAS, or DARAT (Darados ê Daras, Ptol. iv. 6. § 6), a river of Africa, falling into the Atlantic on the W. coast, near the Portus Magnus, and containing crocodiles (Plin. v. 1); probably the Gambia or Dio d'Ouro. [P. S.]

DARAE
DARAE a Gaetulian tribe in the W. of Africa, on a mountain stream called Dara, on the S. steppes of M. Atlas, adjacent to the Pharusii. (Plin. v. 1; Oros. i. 2; Leo Afr. p. 602.) [P. S.]

DARADRAE
DARADRAE (Daradrai, Ptol. vii. 1. § 42), a mountain tribe who lived in the upper Indus. Forbiger conjectures that they are the same people whom Strabo (xv. p. 706) calls Derdae, and Pliny Dardae (vi. 19), and perhaps as the Dadicae of Herodotus (iii. 91, vii. 66). It is possible, however, that these latter people lived still further to the N., perhaps in Sogdiana, though their association with the Gandarii (Sanscrit Gandháras) points to a more southern locality. [V.]

DARANTASIA
DARANTASIA a place in Gallia Narbonensis.

DARAPSA
DARAPSA [BACTRIANA p. 365, a.]

DARDAE
DARADRAE
DARADRAE (Daradrai, Ptol. vii. 1. § 42), a mountain tribe who lived in the upper Indus. Forbiger conjectures that they are the same people whom Strabo (xv. p. 706) calls Derdae, and Pliny Dardae (vi. 19), and perhaps as the Dadicae of Herodotus (iii. 91, vii. 66). It is possible, however, that these latter people lived still further to the N., perhaps in Sogdiana, though their association with the Gandarii (Sanscrit Gandháras) points to a more southern locality. [V.]

DARDANI
DARDANI (Dardanoi), a tribe in the south-west of Moesia, and extending also over a part of Illyricum. (Strab. vii. p. 316; Ptol. iii. 9. § 2; Caes. Bell. Civ. iii. 4; Liv. xl. 57; Plin. iii. 29; Cic. p. Sest. 43) According to Strabo, they were a very wild and filthy race, living in caves under dunghills, but very fond of music. [L. S.]
Dardani were a fierce fighting people recorded in the Egyptian annals as a separate group of the Sea People who came from that Illyrian part called Dardania. In Greece the Dardani people were called simply Doris, as the name dar-dar is a duplication of the name dar- 'tree, cut a tree'. Celtic people called the priestly class as Druids. So the name Dardani was part of the priestly caste among early Indo Europeans. After the migration of the Sea People to Asia Minor, the Hittite Empire seized to exist, hence the Hittite name Willussa (from Hattussa) became Troad from Darda, Dardic, Doris of Illyrian Greek origin. This is the reason why Troy had an older name Wilusa, and a new name Troad. Dor-is, Dar-dar people were the ruling Celtic caste of Indo Europeans who invaded Mycenae and plunged Greece into the Dark Ages. Illyria must have suffered a similar fate as Mycenae and Hattusa. So Illyrian Dardanians received their name Illyroi in Greek meaning 'the conquerors of Wilusa'.


Aeneas
At the fall of Troy, Aeneas left the city in flames, and after wandering in the Mediterranean sea, came to Italy and founded the state that later became Rome.


Birth and Childhood
Aeneas was born from the union of a mortal, Anchises 1, and a goddess, Aphrodite. Some say that it was Zeus himself who aroused in Aphrodite the desire to be joined with a mortal man, so to prevent her to say mockingly that she had joined all the gods with mortals. Aphrodite came to Anchises 1 in the form of a beautiful maiden, saying she was a mortal woman and the daughter of one Otreus. She explained to the incredulous Anchises 1 that she talked his language because she had been brought up by a Trojan nurse. Anchises 1 was taken by desire, but after they had made love, Aphrodite revealed her true identity and Anchises 1 feared the gods would destroy him for having slept with a goddess. But Aphrodite, who herself grieved for having laid in the bed of a mortal man, assured him that he was dear to the gods and nothing would happen to him, provided he would say their child was the offspring of a nymph, for Aphrodite disposed that the NYMPHS would rear Aeneas and that, as soon as he was a boy, he would be restored to his father.


What happened to his father
According to some, Anchises 1, having drunk much wine, told his friends that he was the lover of the goddess, and for this reason he was struck by Zeus’ thunderbolt. Others say, however, that he killed himself, and till others assert that the thunderbolt just crippled him.

Leader of the Dardanians
When the Trojan War had lasted nine years, many allies came to help the besieged Trojans. Among them came Aeneas, who some time before had been driven from Mount Ida by Achilles, as Leader of the Dardanians.

Wounded in battle by Diomedes 2
During the Trojan War, Aeneas was wounded by Diomedes 2 and, having fainted, would have died if his mother had not come to his rescue. Aphrodite herself was wounded by Diomedes 2 on this occasion, but Apollo took over the protection of the wounded Aeneas, removing him from the battle to the citadel of Pergamus where his temple stood. In the sanctuary, Leto and Artemis healed Aeneas and made him even stronger. But for those fighting, Apollo fashioned a phantom of Aeneas, so that Achaeans and Trojans killed each other round it, until the real Aeneas, having recovered, returned to the field.

Poseidon’s Prophecy
In another occasion, at a time when the gods had become more involved in the fighting, Apollo urged Aeneas to challenge Achilles and to fight with him in single combat. Aeneas was very close to die, but Poseidon rescued him, explaining to the other gods:

“Even Zeus might be angry if Achilles killed Aeneas, who after all is destined to survive and to save the House of Dardanus from extinction ... Priam’s line has fallen out of favour with Zeus, and now Aeneas shall be King of Troy and shall be followed by his children’s children in the time to come.” [Poseidon to the gods. Homer, Iliad 20.300]

What Achilles knows about the Trojan royal families This way of speaking would have pleased Aeneas himself, as he had a grudge against King Priam 1 for not giving him his due. Aeneas and Priam 1 represent two royal lines with different interests, as Achilles reminded Aeneas when the latter was eager to fight against him:

“Do you propose to fight me in the hope of stepping into Priam’s shoes and becoming King of the Trojans? Your killing me will not make Priam abdicate for you. He has sons of his own ...” [Achilles to Aeneas. Homer, Iliad 20.180]

Alleged fates of Aeneas after the war
Some say that when the Trojan War was over, Aeneas was given as a prize to Neoptolemus, who had also received Andromache, wife of Hector 1. Others tell that when the Trojans debated what they ought to do with the WOODEN HORSE, there were three opinions: some wanted to hurl the WOODEN HORSE down from the rocks, others wished to burn it, and still others were for dedicating it to Athena. This third opinion prevailed, and the Trojans, believing the war was over, turned to feasting. It was then that the two serpents appeared, which destroyed the seer Laocoon 2 and his sons after he had warned his fellow citizens:

“Is it thus you know Odysseus? Trojans, trust not the horse. Whatever it be, I fear the Greeks, even when bringing gifts.” [Laocoon 2 to the Trojans. Aeneid 2.48]

What happened to Laocoon 2 alarmed Aeneas and his followers in such a way that they withdrew to Mount Ida and were not at Troy when the city was sacked.

Aeneas’ piety
However, others say that Aeneas was indeed at Troy when the city was burned down and that he, carrying his aged father on his back, was allowed by the Achaeans, on account of his piety, to leave the town. Aeneas took also his son Ascanius 2 (later called Iulus 1), and his household gods [the PENATES, see Other Deities], but his wife Creusa 2 became separated from him. Some affirm that Aeneas also took the Palladium with him, bringing it to Italy; but others say otherwise.

Aeneas, in a remembered gesture of piety, carries his father out of Troy

Aeneas & The Fall of Troy
Still others affirm that when the Achaeans came into the city, Aeneas occupied the citadel of Troy, which was fortified with its own wall, and there resisted the enemy who attacked the acropolis. This resistance, they say, allowed many Trojans to save their lives or escape slavery. Having in this way prevented the enemy from taking the whole city by storm, the flower of the army was saved, many lives rescued, and many of the city treasures preserved. The city was anyway lost, but Aeneas had the time to send out from Troy the women, the aged, and the children, putting them in the roads to Mount Ida, together with an escort instructed to take possession of the strongest parts of the mountain. In the meantime, the Achaeans, being busy trying to capture the citadel, gave no thought to the multitude who was leaving the city. Aeneas himself, with the other part of the army, defended the citadel until Neoptolemus gained a foothold in part of the acropolis. Then Aeneas opened the gates and retired, as they say, in good order, carrying with him his family, his household gods, and whatever he considered a treasure, either person or thing.

A Traitor?
Some have said that Aeneas betrayed the city of Troy, and that because of this service the Achaeans allowed him and his family to safely leave the city. Aeneas, they say, had been excluded from his prerrogatives by King Priam 1 and his son Paris, who could be thought to succeed his father after the death of Hector 1. So he overthrew the king, and negotiated with the enemy.

Exile
After leaving Troy, Aeneas came to Mount Ida, where he was joined by inhabitants and troops who had left Dardanus and other cities, after seeing at the distance the great fire rising from Troy. All these hoped to return home when the enemy had sailed away. But the Achaeans, having taken the city and demolished all surrounding forts, were determined to subdue all refugees in the neighbouring territories. Perceiving the danger that threatened them, the Trojans in Mount Ida sent heralds to the Achaeans and an agreement was reached, which allowed Aeneas, as well as his people and valuables, to leave the Troad, after fisrt delivering up all fortifications to the Achaeans. So at the foot of the mountain, Aeneas and his followers built a fleet of twenty ships with which they sailed in the first days of summer.

His son stays
But his son Ascanius 2, they say, came to Dascylium on the Propontis, in Phrygia, since he was invited by its citizens to rule over them. It is also told that Ascanius 2 remained there only until Astyanax 2, the son of Hector 1, was permitted by Neoptolemus to return home from Hellas and rule his country. For, according to this account, little Astyanax 2 was not murdered by the Achaeans during the sack of Troy, but taken prisoner by Neoptolemus.

End of Anchises 1
As for Anchises 1, some say that when Aeneas was in his way to Sicily, he came first to Laconia, founding the cities Aphrodisias and Etis, and that his father died there, being buried by Aeneas at the foot of the mountain called Anchisia after Anchises. However, others say that old Anchises 1 died when they sailed past Lilybaeum, Sicily’s western promontory.

“Yet if you could live on such as now you are in look and in form, and be called my husband, sorrow would no then enfold my heart. But as it is, harsh old age will soon enshroud you, ruthless, wearying and deadly age which stands some day at the side of every man.” [Aphrodite to Anchises 1 when they first met at Mount Ida. Hymn to Aphrodite 245]

Synopsis of Aeneas wanderings: Aeneas built his fleet in Antandrus. He sailed first to Thrace where he met Polydorus 3’s ghost. Then, after having been received in Delos by King Anius, he attempted to settle in Crete but failed. Later, after having stopped in the Strophades Islands and Zacynthos and having sailed past Ithaca, Aeneas came to Buthrotum in Epirus. Thence he crossed to Italy skirting the waters of Tarentum, Lacinium and the Sicilian coast. On his first arrival to Drepanum, Aeneas lost his father. Thence he sailed to Carthage where he met Queen Dido. After having been amorously involved with the queen, Aeneas returned to Drepanum, and thence he crossed to Italy. In Cumae he descended to the Underworld, ending soon after his trip in the harbour of Caieta.

First part of Aeneas’ wanderings In Thrace, where he came first, he received a warning from the ghost of Polydorus 3 (Priam 1’s son), whom King Polymestor 1 of the Bistonians had treacherously murdered [see also Priam 1 and Hecabe 1]:

“Get away from this cruel land, from these hard-fisted shores.” [Ghost of Polydorus 3 to Aeneas. Virgil, Aeneid 3.44]

Next, they were received by Anius, king of Delos, where at the temple of Apollo he received instructions which he believed to mean that he ought to sail to Crete. However, famine and sickness waited for them in Crete, and when they left the island, the home-gods of Aeneas appeared to him and told him to sail to Italy, but having reached the Strophades Islands, they were plundered by the HARPIES.

In the island of Zacynthus, they were received in a friendly manner. The island is called after Zacynthus, son of Dardanus 1 and Batia 1, and brother of Erichthonius 1, an ancestor of Aeneas.

Later they arrived to Buthrotum in Epirus, where Priam 1’s son Helenus 1, having married Andromache (first wife of Hector 1 and, after the Trojan War, concubine of Neoptolemus until the latter’s death) reigned. Helenus 1 gave Aeneas further directions who allowed him to reach Drepanum in Sicily. Some say, however, that Aeneas marched two days from Buthrotum to Dodona, in order to consult the oracle, and that it was in Dodona that he met Helenus 1.

Fails to reach Italy
Thence they intended to sail to Italy, but a storm sent by Hera, who had not forgotten the outrage she suffered at Mount Ida on the occasion of the Judgement of Paris, carried them to Libya, where there was a city Carthage, ruled by Queen Dido.

Queen Dido’s story before Aeneas
Dido, daughter of Belus 2, an Assyrian, was a Phoenician who had left Tyre and founded Carthage. In Tyre she had been married to Sychaeus, a man of great status among the Phoenicians. Sychaeus, however, was murdered by Dido’s brother Pygmalion 2, who was a great lover of gold and a man of power. Dido learned about what had happened when her husband’s ghost appeared to her, disclosed the crime, and urged her to flee the country. She then organised her friends for escape, and having come to Libya, she purchased land, a site that was called “Bull’s Hide” after the bargain by which she should get as much territory as she could enclose with a bull’s hide. And in that site she founded Carthage.

Others say, however, that a Moor king called Iarbas, son of Zeus-Ammon, wished to marry Dido, who, being in love with Aenas, rejected him. Iarbas is also said to have given her the country where she founded her kingdom (Carthage). So, after Dido’s death, Iarbas invaded the country and Dido’s sister Anna 1, who had hoped that Dido would marry Aeneas, went into exile, first in Malta and afterwards in Italy, where she met Aeneas.

Extraordinary paintings in Carthage
After his father’s death at Drepanum in Sicily, Aeneas arrived to the prospering Carthage, where he discovered a series of frescoes depicting the Trojan War. In them, Agamemnon and Menelaus, Priam 1 and Achilles could be seen. He also recognised in the paintings the tents of Rhesus 2, who came from Thrace to fight at Troy and died the day after his arrival, killed by Odysseus and Diomedes 2.

Dido & Aeneas
Queen Dido received the Trojans with hospitality, and fell in love with Aeneas. He, in turn, started to forget that he was meant to sail to Italy. But as he was superintending public works, Hermes, sent by Zeus, came to him, amd reproached him:

“So now you are laying foundations for Carthage, building a beautiful city to please a woman, lost to the interests of your own realm?” [Hermes to Aeneas. Aeneid 4.265]

Aeneas then, remembering his own destiny, decided to leave Dido and Carthage:

“In Italy lies my heart, my homeland. You, a Phoenician, are held by these Carthaginian towers, by the charm of your Libyan city.” [Aeneas to Dido. Aeneid 4.345]

But as Dido would not accept the separation, Aeneas proclaimed:

“No more reproaches ... they only torture us both. God’s will, not mine, says ‘Italy’” [Aeneas to Dido. Aeneid 4.360]

Dido, who felt she had rescued Aeneas’ lost fleet, saved his friends from death, taken a pauper and a castaway and shared her kingdom with him, could not see in Aeneas’ decision more than betrayal and ingratitude. So on Aeneas’ departure, Dido cast herself upon Aeneas’ sword on a pyre, and that is why upon her tomb it was written:

“Aeneas caused her death and lent the blade, Dido by her own hand in dust was laid.” [Ovid, Heroides 8]

Aeneas descends to Hades
After landing once more in Sicily, Aeneas’ fleet came to Cumae where Aeneas, led by the Sibyl, descended to the Underworld. There he met his father, and also Dido, who reunited with her Tyrian husband, refused to talk to him. Some of those whom Aeneas met in the Underworld belong to the past, but others belong to the future, as those from the future lineage of Alba Longa [see also AENEAS IN HADES], and his own son Silvius, who had not yet been born.

End of journey
Next Aeneas came to Latium, a land ruled by King Latinus 1 (son of Faunus 1, son of Picus, son of Cronos), whose daughter Lavinia 2, King Turnus of the Rutulians wished to marry. Turnus was son of King Daunus of Apulia, the same who gave his daughter and lands to Diomedes 2, when the latter landed in Italy after the Trojan War. Latinus 1, however, preferred to give his daughter to Aeneas, as he had learned from an oracle that she was supposed to marry a foreigner. But his wife Amata encouraged Turnus, and because of the intrigue that ensued, a significant war broke out with many allies on both sides.This war only ended when, in single combat, Aeneas killed Turnus. After the war, he married Lavinia 2, and their son Silvius became the founder of Alba Longa.

Death The circumstances of Aeneas’ death are uncertain. Some affirm that Aeneas disappeared during a battle against the army of Mezentius (an ally of his enemy Turnus), but others say that he died in Thrace without ever reaching Italy, or that he, after having settled his people in Italy, returned home and became king of Troy, leaving the kingdom, after his death, to his son Ascanius 2.

It is also told that Aphrodite asked Zeus to make Aeneas immortal, and as Zeus granted her request, the river god Numicius washed away all of Aeneas’ mortal part, and Aphrodite anointed him with Nectar and Ambrosia, making him a god, whom the people later worshipped under the name of Indiges.

Aphrodite receives Aeneas in Olympus

Throne succession after Aeneas
Kings of Alba Notes
Ascanius 2 Son of Aeneas and King of Latium after his father. He is called founder of Alba on Mount Albanus. Upon his death, in the 38th year of his reign, Silvius, his brother, succeeded to the rule.
DH.1.65.1, 1.66.1, 1.70.1-3, 1.72.6; Ov.Met.14.610; Pau.10.26.2; Plu.Rom.2.1; Strab.5.3.2; Vir.Aen.2.675.

Silvius Succeeded Ascanius 2 on the throne of the Alban and Latin state. Son of Aeneas and Lavinia 2. He was father of Latinus 2 and of Silvius Aeneas.

DH.1.70.1-2, 1.71.1; Ov.Fast.4.43; Ov.Met.14.610; Vir.Aen.6.763.

Silvius Aeneas or Latinus 2 Both called sons of Silvius. Latinus 2 is father of Alba.

Silvius Aeneas: DH.1.71.1; Vir.Aen.6.769. Latinus 2: Dio.7.5.10; Ov.Fast.4.43; Ov.Met.14.611.

Alba Son of Latinus 2. Alba or Alba Silvius succeeded Latinus 2 on the throne and himself, some say, was succeeded by Epytus 2.

Dio.7.5.10; Ov.Fast.4.44; Ov.Met.14.612.
Capetus 4 DH.1.71.1.
Capys 2 Son of Epytus 2 and father of Capetus 2.
Dio.7.5.10; Ov.Fast.4.44; Ov.Met.14.612; Vir.Aen.6.768.

Capetus 2 Succeeded his father Capys 2 in the throne of Alba and Latium, and himself was succeeded by his son Tiberinus 2.

Ov.Fast.4.46; Ov.Met.14.612.

Tiberinus 2 This Tiberinus 2, also called Tiberius Silvius, drowned in the river Tiber, which was named after him. He undertook a campaign against the Etruscans, but while leading his army across the Alba river, he fell into the flood and met his death. He was father of Remulus 1 and Acrota, or else of Agrippa.

Dio.7.5.10; Ov.Fast.4.47, 4.49; Ov.Met.14.614.

Agrippa or Acrota Both called sons of Tiberinus 2.

Agrippa (but some say Acrota) became king of Alba after his father [see also Acrota]. Some say he was succeeded by Allodius. Agrippa had a son Remulus 1.

DH.1.71.2; Dio.7.5.10. Ov.Fast.4.49.

Aventinus 2 Received the throne of Alba and Latium from Acrota. From him the place, and also the hill, took their name.

Dio.7.5.12; Ov.Fast.4.51; Ov.Met.14.619.

Proca Proca Silvius. King of Alba and Latium, over the Palatine race. Succeeded his father Aventinus 2. At his death, his younger son Amulius seized the kingship by violence. His other son was Numitor 2.

Dio.7.5.12; Ov.Fast.4.52; Ov.Met.14.622; Vir.Aen.6.767.

Amulius Governed after Proca by the force of arms. He vanquished his brother Numitor 2, and robbed him of power. He is said to have divided the whole inheritance into two parts, setting the treasures and the gold which had been brought from Troy over against the kingdom, and Numitor 2 chose the kingdom. Amulius, then in possession of the treasure, and made more powerful by it than Numitor 2, easily took the kingdom away from his brother. He ordered the twins, sons of his niece Ilia, to be sunk in the river. He is also said to have deflowered Ilia himself. He was finally killed by Romulus, who restored the kingdom to his grandfather.

DH.1.77.1, 1.71.5; Dio.7.5.12; Ov.Fast.3.49, 3.67; Ov.Met.14.772; Plu.Rom.3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 8.6.

Numitor 2 Son of Proca, brother of Amulius and grandfather of Romulus and Remus 1, the founders of Rome. When he died in Alba, the throne devolved upon Romulus. He was father of Ilia, Lausus 2, Aegestus 2, and Aenitus.

DH.1.76.2; Dio.7.5.12; Ov.Fast.4.53, 4.55; Ov.Met.14.773; Plu.PS.36; Plu.Rom.27.1; Vir.Aen.6.768.

Romulus
Romulus is of uncertain parentage; he has been called son of Ares, son of Latinus 1, son of a Phantom, son of Amulius and son of Aeneas. He was, along with his twin brother Remus 1, suckled by a she-wolf. Romulus founded Rome, and gave his name to the entire nation. As he saw twelve birds flying in the sky and his brother only six, Romulus was accorded the government of the city.



Family
Parentage

Anchises 1 & Aphrodite

Anchises 1 was a member of the royal house of Dardania, which is a region neighbouring Troy. Anchises 1’s father was King Capys 1 of Dardania, who recommended throwing the WOODEN HORSE into the sea. Capys 1 is son of Assaracus, son of Tros 1. This Tros 1 called the people of the land Trojans, after his own name. His father was Erichthonius 1, also king of the Dardanians; Erichthonius 1 became rich and powerful, as he inherited both the kingdom of his father and that of his maternal grandfather. This is so because his father was Dardanus 1 after whom the whole country was named, and his mother was Batia 1, daughter of Teucer 2, the eponym of the Teucrians who gave a share of his land to Dardanus 1. Teucer 2 was a son of the river god Scamander 1, and Dardanus 1 is son of Zeus and Electra 3, one of the PLEIADES, daughters of Atlas.

Mates Offspring Notes

a) Creusa 2
b) Eurydice 10 Ascanius 2
Etias [”a)” and “b)” = different versions]
Creusa 2, daughter of Priam 1 and Hecabe 1, was left behind when Aeneas abandoned Troy.

Eurydice 10 is otherwise unknown.
For Ascanius 2, see Throne Succession above.
According to some, Aeneas named the city of Etis in Laconia after his daughter Etias.

Dido
Lavinia 2 Silvius
Aemilia For Silvius, see Throne Succession above.
Aemilia is sometimes called mother of Romulus by Ares.

Roma 2 --- & Roma 2 is said to have given her name to the city of Rome, but see also Roma 1, Roma 3, Romanus, Romus, and Romis.

Dexithea 2
Romulus
Dexithea 2 was daughter of Phorbas 9.
Codone 2 Aeneas’ Daughter 1. Aeneas’ Daughter 1 is said to have been left by Aeneas in Nesos (Arcadia) after the Trojan War [see also Aeneas’ Daughter 2 and Etias].
Anthemone. Aeneas’ Daughter 2 Aeneas’ Daughter 2 is said to have been left by Aeneas in Nesos (Arcadia) after the Trojan War [see also Aeneas’ Daughter 1 and Etias].
unknown Euryleon 2
Romus Euryleon 2 is otherwise unknown.
Romus is said to have given her name to the city of Rome, but see also Roma 1, Roma 3, Romanus, Roma 2, and Romis.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801192013 ... ltaic.html

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:29 pm
by ALBPelasgian
LIST OF ILLYRIAN TRIBES

Ardiaei
Abri
Agrianes
Amantini
Andizetes
Arrianes
Atintani (Atintanes)
Autariates (Autariate)
Azali
Boii
Breuci
Bylliones
Carni
Catari
Celegeri
Chelidones
Colapiani (Colapani)
Cornacates
Daesitiates
Daorsi
Dardani
Dassarstae (Dassarenses,Dassaretae)
Daversi
Delmatae (Delmetae)
Deraemestae
Deuri
Dindari
Ditiones
Docleatae
Encheleae (Enchelleae)
Eravisci
Glintidiones
Grabaei
Histri
Iapode (Japodes)
Iasi (Jasi)
Labeatae (Labeates)
Latobici
Liburni
Maedi
Maezaei
Melcumani
Moesi
Molossi (Molossii)
Naransii
Oseriates (Osseriates)
Paeones
Parthini
Perestae (Penestae)
Pirustae (Pipustae)
Plearaei
Sardeaties
Scirtari
Scordisci
Seleiitani
Siculotae
Soirtones
Taulanti (Tallanii)
Triballi
Vardaei
Veneti



Achaeans versus Illyrian Dorians


Greeks were not the first perpetrators to design a device that could eventuate in stealing historical events and twist the accounts of other people. Among the most despicable acts of theft has been the masterminded plan to plagiarize the Iliad. What would be considered a translation in modern times, was permissible rendering of Illyrian mythological elements into Greek official ideology. The custom of depriving subjugated people of their own gods was practiced from the dawn of civilizations. The invaders would often adopt the gods of the conquered slaves in order to break their spirit and erase their memories. Yet no other invaders apart from Greeks has ever stolen the whole mythology of another people. Not only Greeks stole the Iliad from Illyria but they even changed their own name from Greek into Helens 'people of the sun'. Why did Greeks escape unnoticed for their transgression? The Roman invasion of Illyria the distraction of Illyrian royal records and libraries made the Greek theft invisible. Unable to deal with the rising power of Illyria, weakened Greek city states invited Rome to destroy their annoying Illyrians and only after the fall of the culturally superior neighbors did Greeks change the name into Helens. The acceptance of the name Helen was not an indiscriminate act of surrender before the falsification of history. The very seeds of Greek civilization did not share the same genetic make up. The so-called Dark Ages of Greece, the pouring of Dorian tribes in Peloponnesus was actually an act of retribution for the distraction of Troy. Hence Achaeans finally paid a heavy price for destroying the Illyrian colonies in Asia Minor. The creation of Homeric songs and their impact on Greek psyche corresponded to the destruction of Mycenaean civilization in Greece by Dorian tribes. But were Dorian people Greek by descent? The names of Dorian chieftains show that their origin was actually northern Illyrian where they rushed forth towards Greece. Among Hylleis, Pamphyloi, and the Dymanes, the name of Hylleis (alb. hyllus 'star, sun') is not Greek at all while Dymanes is typically Illyrian, similar to Dymalus : 'two mountains'. Illyrian dynasties used to add the numbers dy- 'two', tri- 'three' in front of their names to symbolize the unique royal line of succession. The method of naming the leaders according to the royal parentage was typical of ancient monarchies. Because Greek people were actually a mixture of invading Achaeans and liberating Dorians the name Helen was considered to be a restoration of 'people of the sun' in their native land. Despite of common Indo European origin Achaean and Dorian were two different cultures. Not only language was different but even the architecture and burial customs were not the same. In the list of Hellenic tribes and cities, Illyrian names can be detected easily.



Hellenic Illyrian Tribes
Greek civilization grew out of a welter of various Hellenic Illyrian tribal nations which had occupied the region from time immemorial or had entered from elsewhere at an early date. Not much is known of this complex group of interrelated peoples.

ÆTHIKES They lived in northern and northwestern Thessaly, on Pindos and Karvounia mountains, near the Peneios river. They were neighbours of the Athamanes and the Tymphaioi and were first mentioned by Homer. They were regarded by other Hellenic peoples as barbarians and thieves. Their towns were Metsovo and Malakasio (nowadays within the administrative division of Ioannina). They disappeared after the Roman annexation of Greece in the 2nd century BCE.
AGRÆOI They lived in the Agrapha Mountains, between the rivers Achelous and Agraphiotes. They called their land Agraea or Agrais. Important cities were Agrinio (capital city of the administrative division of Aetoloakarnania) and Ephyra.
They created their own kingdom.
Salynthios.........................................fl. c. 430 BCE
To the Ætolian League...
AKARNANES They lived in Akarnania, having arrived there from Argos. Their cities were Amphilochia, Amphilochikon Argos, Limnaea, Stratos, Oiniades, Anaktorio, Echinos, Aktio, Solion, Alyzea, Astakos, Phoitia, Medeon, Thourion, and Metropolis.
Alkmeon
Akarnan, with...
Amphoteros
The Akarnanian League..................................5th cent.
Allied to the Amphilochians
Allied to Athens.............................5th cent.-391
To Sparta..........................................391-371
To Thebes..........................................371-300
To Epirus..........................................300-273
Allied to the Ætolian League.......................270-245
To the Ætolian League..............................245-231
2nd Akarnanian League..............................230-225
To Macedonia.......................................225-197
Within the Roman State from 197...
Mnasilochos...................................190-189
ALMOPIA They were located northwestern Macedonia, nowadays adm.div. of Pella, between the rivers Loudias and Axios and between the regions of Eordaea and Pelagonia. The region was inhabited by few people, who were isolated - therefore it was one of the first regions occupied by Macedonia. The primary cities were Orma, Apsalos, Europos, and Notia.
Almopas
To Macedon
AONES Ancient inhabitants of Boeotia after the Ektines, regarded by other Hellenes as barbarians. They lived near Thebes, and came from Sounion (Attica) to Boeotia, together with Temmikes, Leleges, and Yandes.
Aon (Aonia - later called Boeotia - was named after him)
Defeated by the Cadmians
Afterwards they lived between north of Thebes and Lake Yliki.
APERANDOI They lived between the rivers Agraphiotes and Megdovas, to the Agrapha mountains, neighbours of the Agraeoi. They were an Ætolian sub-tribe.
ATHAMANES They lived in northeastern Epirus, on Tzoumerka mountains and in part of the administrative division of Trikala. They were regarded by other Hellenes as a semi-barbarian tribe. Important cities of this tribe: Argothea (capital city) and Theodoria.
Athamas
To the Corinthian League........................c. 395-378
To the 2nd Athenian League.........................378-
During the 2nd Sacred War allied to Macedonia
Opposed to Phocis 354
Opposed to Macedonia 323
Under the control of Macedonia
Alliance with Pyrros of Epirus
Theodoros..........................................fl. c. 205
Amynandrus.........................................fl. c. 201
Formed an Athamanian League
ATINDANES They lived in the region between Chaonia and Dodoni, in northwest Epirus.
Allied to the tribe of Molossoi...................c. 429
Allied to Rome....................................c. 229
Allied to Macedonia..............................225-221
To Macedonia..............................................205
AVANDES They lived in Euboea. They were a protohellenic tribe that came into Greece appr. 2100-1900 BCE. They had lived initially in Phocis (Avai) and some of them in Argolis, Sicyon, Epirus, and Asia Minor.
Avas
Elephinor
Chalkodous
After the Trojan war they colonized Illyria.
They disappeared after the Ionian invasion on Euboea...
BOEOTOI The region of Boeotia is northwest of Attica, nowadays one of the 52 administrative divisions of modern Greece.
Boeotus
Itonus
Hippalcimus, with...
Alector, and...
Areilycus
Leaders of the province during the Trojan war:
Peneleus
Leitos
Arcesilaus
Prothenor
Klonios
Three generations after the Trojan War the region was inhabited by the Boeotian tribe. They lived initially on the Boios mountain of Pindos, between Epirus and Macedonia. From there they moved to Arne between Thessaly and the Pagasitikos bay (till the end of the late Hellenic era). They claimed to be an Ætolian sub-tribe.
Boeotos
Opheltas......................................fl. 1150-1100
Xanthos
By the end of the monarchy, the tribe had colonized the whole region, by c. 950.
1st Boeotian League................................525-480
This consisted of the city-states of Thebes, Koronea, Aliartos, Tanagra, Thespies, while Orchomenos and Plataea remained independent, and Eleutheres and Erythres went to Athens.
Allied to Persia..............................490-479
2nd Boeotian League................................479-447
3rd Boeotian League................................447-387
Boeotia was divided into districts in this era. These were:
a.) Thebais (including the cities of Thebes, Knopia, Ogchestos, Potniae, Kalydna, Therapnae, Schoinous, Peteon, Teumissos, Glisas, Yla, Foinikis, Tropheia),
b.) Orchomenia or Phlegyandis or Andreis (Orchomenos, Askledon, Tegyra, Yettos, Achmones, Kyrtone),
c.) Chaeronea,
d.) Kopon (Kopes, Akraefnio),
e.) Levadeia,
f.) Koronea (Koronea, Alalkomemes, Tylfossion),
g.) Aliartia (Aliartos, Medeon, Okalea),
h.) Thespiki (Thespies, Eutrisi, Lefktra, Kerissos, Nisa, Askre, Ippotes, Thisvi, Korsies, Sifoi),
i.) Plataeis (Plataea),
j.) Tanagraea or Poimandria (Tanagra, Delio),
k.) Parasopea (Eteonos, Skolos, Ysies, Erythres),
l.) Tetrakomia (Phires, Aulis, Mykalessos, Arma, Eleion, Yrea),
m.) Anthedon (Anthedon, Isos, Salganeas),
n.) Larymna (Karsea, Ales),
o.) Oropos
4th Boeotian League................................378-338
To Macedon.........................................338-245
5th Boeotian League...........................336-146
To Aetolia.........................................245-236
To Macedon.........................................236-146
To the Roman Republic..............................146-27
6th Boeotian League.......................146 BCE-3rd cent. CE
To the Roman Empire (dist. of Achaea 85 BCE)....27 BCE-395 CE
CHAONES Ancient protohellenic tribe with a Pelasgian root. They lived in Epirus, between the Keraunia mountains and Kalamas river, therefore the first name of Epirus was Chaonia. They were related the the Chaones of southern.Italy. Important cities: Vouthroton, Ilion, Foenice, Panormos, Ogchismos, Amandia, Antigonea
Chaon
They developed a system relying on an annual leader. By the 5th century they had combined to a large degree with local Thesprotean and the Illyrian peoples.
Allied to Ambracia against the Akarnanes..........428
Photios and...
Nikanor
To the League of Epirus............................232-170
To Rome................................................170
DOLOPES An ancient Aetolian tribe, related to the Magnites. They lived in Acarnania, southern Thessaly, and Phthia. Their borders were Phthia and Aenianes (East), Eurytanes-Agraeoi (South), Amphilochia (West), Athamanes-Thessaliotis (North). Their capital city was Ktimeni; other important cities were Dolopeis, Ageiai, Menelais, and Ellopia.
Dolops
Ktimenes
To Phthia
Phoinikas
Allied to Persia during the Persian Wars
Opposed to Herakleia 420.
To Pheres 374
To Macedonia 344
Allied to Athens 323
To the Aetolian League
To Macedonia
Independent........................................189-174
DORIANS A major Hellenic group of closely related tribes or septs, the Dorians are regarded both in archeology and in legend as the conquerors of the Peloponessus. Initially they lived in the area near Mount Olympus, in the land of Doris. In the 12th century they began migrating southward, and three separate Doric tribes (Hylleis, Pamphyloi, and the Dymanes) settled in eastern and southern Peloponnesus, displacing the native Achaeans. The mythological account of this has it that these three groups were the descendents of three Herakleides (children of Herakles), Temenus, Aristodemus, and Cresphontes, who successfully recovered an inheritence lost to a cousin, Eurysthenes of Mycenae. They were a rather dour, plain-spoken, and harshly disciplined people - as their best-known branch, the Classic Age Spartans, personified greatly. The tension between themselves and the other great Hellenic people, the Ionians - who regarded Dorics as barely-literate, ill-mannered martinets - is at the heart of a great deal of Greek historical development.
Doros
Ægimios
Yllos
Colonization of the Peloponnesus..................from c. 1100
Afterwards the Dorians colonized Megara, Argolis, Laconia, Messinia, Aegina, Milos, Thera, Crete, Rhodes and Corinth.
DRYOPES Related to the tribe of Leleges, they were a barbaric tribe. They lived in the area between the mountains Oiti and Parnassus. They called their land Dryopis. Owing to Dorian pressure they evacuated their land and colonized Euboea, Karystos, Styra, Cyprus, Kythnos, Argolis (Asine, Nemea), Messinia, and Epirus. Main city: Drys.
Dryops
Melaneus
EKTINES The first inhabitants of Boeotea.
Ogygos
EORDAEA Ancient region (and tribe) in western Macedonia near the lake Vegoritis. Eordaea’s borders were Almopia-Lyngistis (North), Elimea (South), Imathia (East), Orestis (West). Inhabited during the late Bronze Age, the Eordoi were a proto-Hellenic, Indo-European that came to Eordaea appr. 2200 BCE. Nowadays there is the administrative division of Kozane. Main cities were Eordaea, Arnissa, Vegora and Kellas. Eordaea was the birthplace Ptolemy Lagos, the Macedonian general who gained the throne of Egypt.
Eordos
Destroyed by the Timenides of Macedonia
Allied to the Greeks during the Persian wars
EPEIOI A Pelasgian tribe in the western Peloponnesus, they lived in Elea, Pisatis, western Achaea, and the Echinades islands. Their cities: Vouprasion, Elida, Yrmine, Myrsinos, Olene, Dyme, Ephyra, Kyllene, Pylos, Aleisio.
Epeios
During the Trojan War there were 4 different kingdoms...
Polyxenos and...
Thalpios and...
Andimachos and...
Diores
Many conjoined with Kaukones and Ionians and lived in Achaea (the Larissos River district).
The Epeioi of Pisa combined with the Arcadians and dwelt lived in Pisatis.
Agorios
The remaining eventually melded with the Ætolians and lived in Elea; Elean sequence thereafter...
EURYTANES An Ætolian sub-tribe, they lived in the district of Karpenissi (today:capital city of Evritania), between the mountains Panaitolikon and Tymfristos. Their borders were Aenianes (East), Dolopes (North), Aperandoi-Akarnanes (West), Aetolians (South), Thestians (Southwest), Ofionians (Southeast). During the prehistoric era they had probably lived in Thessaly. Their capital city was Oichalia.
Eurytos
Allied to the Ætolians
From time to time to the Achaeans of Phthia, to Thessaly or to Macedonia
To Rome 146
GEFYRAEOI A non Hellenic tribe (Poinicians) They lived in Boeotia in the town Gefyra. Afterwards they moved into Attica It is claimed that they brought the alphabet into Greece. Homeland of Armodios and Aristogeiton, murderers of the Athenian tyrants Hippias and Hipparchus
IDONOI They lived in western Thrace, between the rivers Strymon and Nestos (nowadays there are the cities Drama and Zichne). Their land was called Idonis or Andandros. Important cities were Myrkinos (capital-city), Draviskos and Amphipolis.
Idoneus
Lykurgos
Getas..............................................fl. c. 500
To Persia during the Persian wars
IONIANS One of the great pan-Hellenic tribal groups. They lived initially in southwestern Thessaly, but at a very early date migrated south. Some of them remained in southwestern Thessaly and others moved to west Locris, Achaea and Pisa. Afterwards they colonized Attica and Asia Minor. They also extensively settled the Cyclades, Euboea, Corinth, Megara, Epidaurus, and by the end of the Mycenean era they were in Attica, Megaris, Epidaurus, Troezin, Kynourua and Achaea. Defeated by the Achaeans, Minyes, Phlegyes and Lapithes, they remained largely in Attica, some of the islands, and most especially in western Asia Minor, which became known as "Ionia". They are to a large extent responsible for Greek literature, philosophy, and much Hellenic art (the Ionian dialect is the foundation upon which standard Classic Greek developed, which in turn gave birth to "Koine" (Common speech - the language of most of the New Testament), Byzantine dialects, and ultimately modern Greek. In acquiescing to Persian hegemony in Asia Minor during the 6th and 5th centuries, they earned the scornful contempt of the Peloponessian Dorians, who regarded Ionians as weak, compliant, mendacious, and very likely treasonous. It is this tension between the two groups which is at the heart of much of Greek historical development.
Ion
Partitioned into four sub-tribes: Geleondes, Oplites, Aegikoreis and Argadeis.
KIKONES They lived between the Evros river and the Vistonis lake. They came there appr. 1300-1200 BCE. Their cities were Xantheia, Maronea, Ismaros, Zone and Kyzikos.
Allied to Trojans
Euphimos
Mendes
Their capital Ismaros was conquered by Ulysses after the Trojan war
After the Mycenean era they disappeared as an identifiable people.
KRESTONES The Kristones lived in Krestonia a Macedonian district between Chalkidicia and the Strymon river. They were a Pelasgo-Thracian sub-tribe. Important cities: Antigonea, Xylopolis, Terpyllos, Karavia, Kreston.
To Mygdonia from 480 BCE
LAPITHES The main inhabitants of early Thessaly, together with the centaurs (Northern Pelasgia-Perraivia). Their main cities: Argissa, Gyrtone, Orthe, Elone, Olossoi. They colonized Perraivia. In the 10th cent. they built a lot of cities in other regions (Koronos of Koronea, Phaliros of Phalara, Elatos of Elateia in Arcadia, Boeotia and Phocis, Phorvas and Triopas in Rhodes).
Lapithus
Ypseus
Ixion
Peirithous
Kaeneas (his succestors were the Kypselides of Corinth)
Koronos (his succestors were the Phylaides of Attica) with...
Polypoites and...
Leondeus (during the Trojan War)
They were defeated by Ægimios, king of the Dorians...
LELEGES Prehistoric tribe, they were nomads.
Leles (from Laconia or Egypt)
They colonized the Cyclades islands, Asia Minor, Aetolia, Acarania, Megara (King Leles), Locris, Leukas, Euboea, Boeotia and Lacedaemon (King Eurotas)
Leleges from Sparta colonized Messinia (King Polykaon)
Leleges from Megara colonized Pylos (Messinia) and Pylos (Elis)
Leleges in Epirus were neighbors of the tribe of Molossoi
In Thessaly they succeeded the Pelasgoi
Evacuation of Ionia due to the Greeks 1200-1100 BCE
Altis (King during the Trojan war - allied to the Trojans)
After the Trojan war they inhabited Chios and Samos
Evacuation of Caria owing to pressure from the tribe of Cares
LYNGISTES They lived in Macedonia, in the Lyngystis Region (nowadays: Florina) and their capital-city was called Herakleia. An Illyrian tribe, they were neighbours of the Dassarites. Main cities were Herakleia, Kella, Vevi.
VAKCHIADES
Aeropos
Vromeros
Arrabaius..........................................fl. c. 423
Argaeus............................................fl. c. 391
To Macedonia appr. 338
MAGNITES They lived on Thessaly, in Magnesia, they were a Macedonian sub-tribe. Important tribe during the Neolithic, Bronze, Minoan and Mycenean ages. Their cities were: Mithone, Thaumakine, Melivoia, Olizon and Minyai.
Magnes
Prothous
Philoktetes and...
Medon (during the Trojan War)
Continued independence until the 6th cent.
To Thessaly..................................6th cent.-363
To Pheres..........................................363-c. 342
To Macedonia....................................c. 342-194
Founding of Demetrias, capital city of Magnesia 293 BCE
The Magnesian League...............................194-171
Eurylochos........................................193
To Macedonia.......................................171-168
To Rome - (within the Magnesian League)...........from 168
MALIEIS They lived in southern Thessaly, a Dorian sub-tribe. The Malians were partitioned into three sub-tribes: Trachinioi, Paralioi, Iereis. Their capital city was Herakleia and afterwards Lamia.
Within the Malis region (their land was named after them) from c. 1100
Malos
To the Amphictiony of Delphi.................8th cent.- ?
Opposed to the Phoceans end 6th cent.
To Thessaly
To Sparta..........................................427-c. 371
To Pheres.......................................c. 371-370
To Thebes..........................................370-343
To Macedonia.......................................343-220
To the Ætolian league..............................220
To Thessaly appr. 27 BCE
MOLOSSOI An Epirote tribe dwelling in the north, who succeeded in gaining control over all of Epirus in late Classical times. They were best known for a breed of huge war-mastiffs they used in military operations.
For their rulers, see the earliest (pre-Aeacid) leaders of Epirus. Molossus, their eponymous ancestor, was said to have been born of a union between Neoptolemus and Andromache.
Established the Kingdom of Epirus, 6th or 5th centuries ?
Epirus to the Aeacid dynasty 395.
A League of Molossoi formed c. 300, within Epirote and then Roman jurisdiction.
MYGDONES A Thracian tribe living in southern Macedonia between the rivers Axios and Strymon, in northern Chalkidicia, near the Thermaikos Gulf. Their cities were Therme, Sidos, and Chalestri.
To Paeonia......................................to the 350's BCE
To Macedonia thereafter...
OETAEOI They lived on the mountain Oeti in southern Thessaly and in the 5th century in the valley of Aspos river. Important cities: Antikera, Anthile, Herakleia, Trachis.
Opposed to Dorians and Trachineans
Formed the Oeteanid League
To the Aetolians...................................280-168
To the Achaean League..............................162-146
Free and independent for a time; then...
To the Thessalian League thereafter...
ORESTES They lived in Epirus in their land called Orestis, which was part of Molossia. They inhabited the northern and northwestern borders of Greece between the rivers Aous and Achelous. They claimed to be successors of Orestes of Mykenaea. Important cities were Orestia and Argos Orestikon.
To Macedonia
To the Orestian League of Orestes within Roman hegemony
To the Roman district of Macedonia
PAETOI A minor tribe living in the region called Paetike. Their most important city was Zerenia.
To Persia and against the Greeks during the Persian wars appr. 500-480
To Macedonia, 336
Against the Persians 334
PELASGOI An Indo-European tribe, that came into the Hellenic region appr. 3000 BCE. They lived in western Thessaly and Epirus. Afterwards they colonized not only Argolis and Arcadia, but also some of the Aegean islands, Attica, Crete, Ionia, Achaea, Phocis, Phthiotis, Euboea, Kristonia and Sicyon.
Pelasgos
Chloros
Most of them disappeared after the end of the Mycenean era, but some Pelasgian communities survived till the beginning of the 5th century BCE in Kristonia and Propontis.
PERRAIVOI They lived in northern Thessaly, initially in the district of Istiaiotis. Their cities were Gonnoi, Olousson, Phalanna, Doliche, and the Perraivean Tripolis (3 cities) consisting of Azoros, Polichna, and Pythion.
Triopas
Karkavos............................................c. 1500 BCE
Gouneus (during the Trojan war)
To the Amphictiony of Delphi
To Larissa
To Archelaos of Macedonia
Defeated by the Aetolian League........................199
Members as free tribe in the Delphian Amphictiony......196
They created a Perraivean League...................196-191
To Macedonia.......................................191-185
THE SEA PEOPLES Students of European history will be familiar in a general way with the phenomena of the devolution of Classic cultures, the swarming forth of innumerable barbarian tribes, and the subsequent emergence of the so-called "Dark Ages", together with the slow re-emergence of a vibrant civilization in the Mediaeval and Renaissance eras. Such a model is an oversimplification of what occurred, but it is valid at least in broad descriptive outline. What is perhaps less well recognized is that such a pattern has happened, albeit on a smaller scale, before. Before the 1200's BCE, the Eastern Mediterranean played host to a variety of sophisticated civilizations. For a variety of reasons, the 17th to 13th centuries BCE saw a general retreat, one which did not begin to reverse itself until the 9th century BCE (leading to the eventual flowering of Classic-Age civilization by the 5th century). One important factor in this process was the sudden emergence of a group of barbarian tribes known collectively as the Sea-Peoples. These raiders critically damaged the ancient civilizations of Greece, Anatolia and Syria, and seriously threatened the southern Levant and Egypt. The origins of these peoples are unknown, though it is believed that they emerged from the Aegean and may have been Minoan or Greek in origin. They referred to their own homeland as Ahhiyawa, which seems to be related to the word Achaean. The Hittites described their home as an island near Milawanda (Miletos, on the Ionian coast); which may refer to Rhodes, while the Bible describes their origin-point as Caphtor, which is believed to be Crete. They were technologically and artistically sophisticated, being one of the first groups in the Levant to use iron weapons. The following is a list of the documented Sea Peoples, and what linguists and archeologists believe about their origins and eventual fates...
DANYA / DANNUNA They have been identified with the Danaoi, mentioned in Homer's Iliad; another, far-fetched explanation is that they are related to the Gaelic Celts (Danaan). Some historians and archeologists have suggested that the Danya invaded Canaan in alliance with the Philistines but then joined the Israelite tribal confederation as the tribe of Dan. The original territory of that tribe bordered Philistia, and the Philistines seemed to bear a particular grudge against the Danites, who eventually relocated to the Galilee.
EKWESH This name is very similar to the Hittite name for Greeks (Acheans). Very little is known about them.
LUKKA These are believed to have hailed from Lycia, and probably returned there after several unsuccessful invasions of Egypt.
PELESHET These are the Philistines who settled in the southern coast of Canaan and established the pentapolis of Gaza, Gath, Ekron, Ashkelon and Ashdod. They may have invaded Canaan originally in alliance with the Israelites, who settled in the inland areas, but any collegiality quickly disappeared if Biblical records are anything to go by. The name Palestine, given to Judea by the Romans after the Jewish Wars, is believed to be derived from Philistine, although some scholars have suggested that it actually (ironically) comes from a derogatory Greek epithet for Jew.
SHARDANA Formerly, it was thought that this people migrated out of the Hellenic region, crossed the central Mediterranean, and conquered Sardinia, which still bears a variant of their name. Recently though, it has been suggested that the migration was in the opposite direction - that they were aboriginal inhabitants of Sardinia who traveled eastward into the Hellenic littoral.
TJEKER / SHEKELESH The Tjeker are of uncertain origin, but they raided Egypt repeatedly before settling in northern Canaan. They may originally have been the Teucri, a tribe inhabiting northwest Anatolia around Troy. They conquered the city-state of Dor and turned it into a Tjeker kingdom. They are one of the few of the Sea Peoples for whom a ruler's name is recorded - in the papyrus account of Wenamun, an Egyptian priest...
· Beder (Prince of Dor)........................mid 1000's BCE ?
· Dor fell to King David of Israel in the 990's, and the Tjeker are not mentioned after that date.
Besides the Dorite Tjeker, some scholars believe that the Tjeker may have been connected in some way with the Israelite tribe of Menasseh.
TYRSENNOI May be related to the Etruscans, since their name is similar to Tyrrhennoi, the Etruscans' name for themselves (hence the Tyrrhian sea).
WESHESH Their origins are unknown, though there is some evidence that they may have come from the area of Caria. Some have theorized that they, like the Danya, became part of the Israelite confederacy (as the tribe of Asher).
TEMMIKES A barbarian tribe living in Boeotia before the Cadmians and the Boeotians. They came to Boeotia along with the Aones, Leleges, and Yandes.
THESPROTIANS Their region was called Thesprotia. Nowadays Thesprotia is one of the 52 administrative division (nomoi) of Greece (capital-city: Preveza). They lived in Epirus between the Amvrikikos Bay and the Kalamas river and between Pindos mountains and the Ionian Sea.
The first inhabitants.................................................Early Bronze Age
Beginning of the middle Hellenic period the region had been inhabited by the tribes of Elopes, Greacians, Kassopaeoi, Dryopes, Dononians. They moved and colonized afterwards Ithaca, Leucas, Akarnania
Partial colonization of Thessaly and S.Greece 12th-11th cent.
Thesprotos
Kallidice
Isolated until appr. 730 BCE
South Thesprotia was occupied by Eleans 7th cent.
Allied to Corinth................................. ? -5th cent.
Allied to Athens and the kingdom of Molossoi.......415-404
Occupation of Kassopaea, Dodoni, East Thesprotia by Molossoi after 400 BCE
To the 2nd Athenian league.........................375-c. 350
The Thesprotian League middle 4th cent. (cap-city: Elea, afterwards Titane)
To Macedonia.......................................343-300
To the League of Molossoi..............................300
To Macedonia.......................................300-220
To the Epirote League..............................220-167
To Epirus..............................................167
The Thesprotian League........................167-148
Assigned as a district of Macedonia within Rome....148-27
Assigned as a district of Achaea within the Roman Empire from 27 BCE
The Thesprotians were divided into many sub-tribes: Aegestaeoi, Dodonians, Eleaeoi, Elinoi, Ephyroi, Ikadotoi, Kartatoi, Kestrinoi, Klauthrioi, Kropioi, Larissaeoi, Onopernoi, Opatoi, Tiaeoi, Torydaeoi, Fanoteis, Farganaeoi, Fylates, Chimerioi.
Their main cities were Ephyra, Chimerion and Torine.
VISALTES They lived in Macedonia, east of the Mygdonia region, between the Volvi lake and the Strymonas river
Their cities were: Verge, Euporia, Kalliteres, Oreskia, Visaltia (capital-city). Before the 5th cent. Visaltie and Kristonia had a common history
Mosses..........................................c. 500-480
Demetrius..........................................fl. c. 450
Vastareas..............................................c. 350
To Macedonia..............................4th cent. to 179
Part of Mygdonian territory (within Macedon and then Rome) from 179...
VISTONES They lived in the Rhodopi district to the Aegean sea, near Abdera. Their land was called Vistonea and it was between the Kikones and the Sapes regions.
Vistonas
Orpheus
Diomedes (during the Trojan war)
YANDES Proto-Hellenic tribe inhabiting Boeotia alongside the Aones, Leleges, and Temmikes. They lived near Thebes, and in later times colonized East Phocis (building the city of Yambolis), West Locris, and Aetolia.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801160000 ... ian/tribes

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:30 pm
by ALBPelasgian
Hittite King List
The table below is reproduced from Trevor Bryce, The Kingdom of the Hittites, Oxford, 1998, pp.xiii-xiv.
Old Kingdom
Labarna ?-1650
Hattusili I 1650-1620 grandson (?)
Mursili I 1620-1590 grandson, adopted son (?)
Hantili I 1590-1560 brother-in-law
Zidanta I | son-in-law
Ammuna | 1560-1525 son
Huzziya I | brother of Ammuna's daughter-in-law
Telepinu 1525-1500 brother-in-law
Alluwamna | son-in-law
Tahurwaili | interloper
Hantili II | 1500-1400 son of Alluwamna (?)
Zidanta II | son (?)
Huzziya II | son (?)
Muwatalli I | interloper
.
New Kingdom
Tudhaliya I/II | grandson of Huzziya II (?)
Arnuwanda I | 1400-1360* son-in-law, adopted son
Hattusili II (?) | son (?)
Tudhaliya III 1360-1344 son (?)
Suppiluliuma I 1344-1322 son
Arnuwanda II 1322-1321 son
Mursili II 1321-1295 brother
Muwatilli II 1295-1272 son
Urhi-Teshub 1272-1267 son
Hattusili III 1267-1237 uncle
Tudhaliya IV 1237-1228 son
Kurunta 1228-1227 cousin
Tudhaliya IV+ 1227-1209 cousin
Arnuwanda III 1209-1207 son
Suppiluliuma II 1207-? brother
* Includes period of coregency, + Second reign as king
Bryce notes (loc. cit.): "All dates are approximate. When it is impossible to suggest even approximate dates for the individual reigns of two or more kings in sequence, the period covered by the sequence is roughly calculated on the basis of 20 years per reign. While obviously some reigns were longer than this, and some shorter, the averaging out of these reigns probably produces a result with a reasonably small margin of error."

According to the line of Hittite Kings a king's name was added the suffix -ili to identify him with the sun god. Apart from Illyrians there were no other people in Europe or Asia who would continue to add specifically -ili suffix (sun's name) to a king's title. There is no doubt that Hittites learned how to deify dead kings from their neighboring Assyrians. Among Semitic languages -ili suffix meant simply god.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801181030 ... an/hittite

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:31 pm
by ALBPelasgian
assyrian
home page


ASSYRIAN KING LIST



KING DATE, APPROXIMATE
Ilushuma c.1900 BCE
Erishum
Sargon I
Gap of several kings.
Ahamash-Adad I 1814 - 1782
Ishme-Dagan 1781 - 1742
Gap of several kings.
Erishum III c.1550
Shamshi-Adad I
Ishme-Dagan II
Shamshi-Adad II
Ashur-nirari I
Puzur-Ashur III
Enlil-Nasir
Nur-ili
Enlil-nasir II
Ashur-nirari II
Ashur-bel-nisheshu
Ashur-rim-nisheshu
Ashur-nad-ahhe II
Eriba-Adad I 1392 - 1366
Ashur-uballit I 1365 - 1330
Enlil-nirari 1329 - 1320
Aril-den-ili 1319 - 1308
Adad-nirari I 1307 - 1275
Shalmaneser I 1274 - 1245
Tukulti-Ninurta I 1244 - 1208
Ashur-nadin-apli 1207 - 1204
Gap of two minor rulers.
Enlil-kudur-usur 1197 - 1193
Ninurta-apal-Ekur 1192 - 1180
Ashur-dan I 1179 - 1134 ?
Ninurta-tukulti-Ashur
Ashur-resh-ishi 1133 - 1116
Tiglath-pileser I 1115 - 1077
Asharid-apal-Ekur II
Ashur-bel-kala 1074 - 1057
Gap of five rulers.
Ashur-rabi II 1010 - 970
Ashur-resh-ishi II
Tiglath-pileser II 966 - 935
Ashur-dan II 934 - 912
Adad-nirari II 911 - 891
Tukulti-Ninurta II 890 - 884
Ashur-nasir-pal 883 - 859
Shalmanesar III 858 - 824
Shamshi-Adad V 823 - 811
Adad-nirari III 810 - 783
Shalmaneser IV 782 - 772
Ashur-dan III 771 - 754
Ashur-nirari V 753 - 746
Tiglath-pileser III 745 - 727
Shalmaneser V 726 - 722
Sargon II 721 - 705
Sennacherib 704 - 681
Esarhaddon 680 - 669
Ashurbanipal 668 - 626
Ashur-etillu-ili 625 - 623 ?
Sin-sahr-ishkun 622? - 612
End of Assryian empire Ashur captured 614 BCE
Nineveh captured 612 BCE



Actually Assyrians borrowed the deification of their kings from Babylonians:
First Dynasty of Babylon
This uses the traditional Middle Chronology, although there is now reason to believe it may be too early by as much as a century.
· Sumu-abum 1894-1881 BCE
· Sumu-la-El 1880-1845 BCE
· Sabium 1844-1831 BCE
· Apil-Sîn 1830-1813 BCE
· Sin-muballit 1812-1793 BCE
· Hammurabi1792-1750 BCE
· Samsu-iluna 1749-1712 BCE
· Abi-eshuh 1711-1684 BCE
· Ammi-ditana 1683-1647 BCE
· Ammi-saduqa 1646-1626 BCE
· Samsu-ditana 1625-1595 BCE
Early Kassite Monarchs
These rulers did not rule Babylon itself, but their numbering scheme was continued by later Kassite Kings of Babylon, and so they are listed here.
· Gandash fl. c.1730 BCE
· Agum I
· Kashtiliash I
· Ushshi
· Abirattash
· Kashtiliash II
· Urzigurumash
· Harbashihu
· Tiptakzi
Sealand Dynasty (Dynasty II of Babylon)
This dynasty also did not actually rule Babylon, but rather the Sumerian regions south of it. Nevertheless, it is traditionally numbered the Second Dynasty of Babylon, and so is listed here.
· Iluma-ilum fl. c.1732 BCE
· Itti-ili-nibi
· Damiq-ilishu
· Ishkibal
· Shushushi
· Gulkishar
· [5 Kings]
· Ea-gamil fl. c. 1460 BCE
Kassite Dynasty (Third Dynasty of Babylon)
· Agum II fl. c.1570 BCE
· Burnaburiash I
· Kashtiliash III
· Ulamburiash
· Agum III
· Kadashman-harbe I
· Karaindash
· Kurigalzu I
· Kadashman-Enlil I d. 1376 BCE
· Burnaburiash II 1375-1347 BCE
· Karahardash 1347-1345 BCE
· Kurigalzu II 1345-1324 BCE
· Nazimaruttash 1323-1298 BCE
· Kadashman-Turgu 1297-1280 BCE
· Kadashman-Enlil II 1279-1265 BCE
· Kudur-Enlil 1265-1255 BCE
· Shagarakti-Shuriash 1255-1243 BCE
· Kashtiliash IV 1243-1235 BCE
Assyrian Governors 1235-1227 BCE
· Enlil-nadin-shumi
· Adad-shuma-iddina
· Adad-shuma-usur 1218-1189 BCE
· Melishipak 1188-1174 BCE
· Marduk-apal-iddina I 1173-1161 BCE
· Zababa-shuma-iddina 1161-1159 BCE
· Enlil-nadin-ahhe 1159-1157 BCE
Dynasty IV of Babylon, from Isin
· Marduk-kabit-ahheshu 1156-1139 BCE
· Itti-Marduk-balatu
· Ninurta-nadin-shumi
· Nebuchadrezzar I 1124-1103 BCE
· Enlil-nadin-apli
· Marduk-nadin-ahhe
· Marduk-shapik-zeri
· Adad-apla-iddina 1067-1046 BCE
· Marduk-zer-X 1046-1032 BCE
· Nabu-shum-libur 1032-1025 BCE
Dynasty V of Babylon
· Simbar-shipak 1024-1007 BCE
· [2 kings] 1007-1004 BCE
Dynasty VI of Babylon
· Eulma-shakin-shumi 1003-987 BCE
· [2 kings] 986-984 BCE
Dynasty VII of Babylon
· Mar-biti-apla-usur 984-977 BCE
Dynasty VIII of Babylon
· Nabu-mukin-apli 977-942 BCE
Dynasty IX of Babylon
· Ninurta-kudurri-usur 942-941 BCE
· Mar-biti-ahhe-iddina
· Shamash-mudammiq
· Nabu-shuma-ukin 899-888 BCE
· Nabu-apla-iddina 887-855 BCE
· Marduk-zakir-shumi I 854-819 BCE
· Marduk-balassu-iqbi
· Baba-aha-iddina
· [5 kings]
· Ninurta-apla-x
· Marduk-bel-zeri
· Marduk-apla-usur
· Eriba-Marduk 769-761 BCE
· Nabu-shuma-ishkun 760-748 BCE
Dynasty IX of Babylon
· Nabu-nasir 747-734 BCE
Dynasty X of Babylon (Assyrians and Chaldeans)
· [2 kings] 734-732
· Nabu-mukin-zeri 732-721
· Pulu (Tiglath-Pileser III of Assyria, in opposition) 732-727 BCE
· Marduk-apal-iddina II (the Biblical Merodach-Baladan) 721-710 BCE
· Sargon II of Assyria 710-705 BCE
· Marduk-zakir-shum 705
· Marduk-apal-iddina III 705-702
· Bel-ibni 702-700
· Ashur-nadin-shumi (son of Sennacherib of Assyria) 699-694
· Mushezib-Marduk 693-689
Assyrian Sack of Babylon, 689; Babylon is rebuilt by Esarhaddon of Assyria in the 670s BCE)
· Shamash-shum-ukin (son of Esarhaddon) 668-648
· Kandalanu (possibly Ashurbanipal of Assyria) 647-627
Dynasty XI of Babylon (Neo-Babylonian or Chaldean)
· Nabopolassar 625 - 605 BCE
· Nebuchadrezzar II 605 - 562 BCE
· Amel-Marduk 562 - 560 BCE
· Nergalsharusur 560 - 556 BCE
· Labashi-Marduk 556 BCE
· Nabonidus 556 - 539 BCE
In 539 BCE, Babylon was captured by Cyrus the Great of Persia, and lost its independence.


But Babylonians borrowed the concept of king deification from the oldest civilization - Sumerian:

http://web.archive.org/web/200801130113 ... n/assyrian

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:32 pm
by ALBPelasgian
WHEN THE KING BECAME A GOD

In Hittite texts the death of a king not only was considered taboo word but the entire fabric of words was designed to avoid offending the monarch. Hittites used the expression 'the king became a god' instead of 'the king died'. As a sign of respect Hittites added ubiquitously the suffix -ili to the name of a king to solidify the worship of a king even while he was alive. This particular suffix meant 'god' among Semitic people adjacent to the Hittites. Near the ancient Wilusa in Asia Minor lived Dardanians, an Illyrian tribe. The founders of Ilios, Illyrians used the same practice as Hittites to deify their own kings. The origin of Indo European suffix -ili 'god' is in the ancient Uruk, the kingdom of Sumerians who regularly added the title of Enlil to the name of a king.






It is obvious that Indo European sun god was created after the Sumerian god Enlil. Enlil, lord wind, Mesopotamian (Sumerian) [Iraq], is god of the air. He was worship from 3500 BC, or before, to about 1750 BC. The son of primordial An and Ki, Enlili was the tutelary deity of Nippur where, in his honor, the Ehur sanctuary was built, not rediscovered, and he became the most important god of southern Mesopotamia during the third millennium BC. His consort was Ninlil who was impregnated by the "waters of Emlil" to give birth to the moon god Nanna. (In the Akkadian pantheon his consort becomes Mulliltu.) He is depicted in a horned headdress and a tiered skirt, or by a horned crown on a pedestal.

According to the Hymn to Enlil, he works alone and unaided. He is said to have made the pickax, "caused the good to come forth," and "brought forth seed from the earth." He was invoked to bless his cities to ensure prosperity and abundance. So great was his importance that other tutelary deities were said to have traveled to Nippur to give Enlil offerings. Enlil created several deities concerned with the overseeing of the natural world. In his destructive aspect, he permitted the birth goddess to kill at birth and was responsibility for miscarriages in cows and ewes. His believers saw him manifest himself in both benevolence and destructive violence. His natural status was gradually decreased in the Babylonian and Assyrian pantheons, being superseded by Marduk and Assur. A.G.H.


Enlil
by Micha F. Lindemans

In ancient Sumero-Babylonian myth, Enlil ("lord wind") is the god of air, wind and storms. Enlil is the foremost god of the Mesopotamian pantheon, and is sometimes referred to as Kur-Gal ("great mountain"). In the Sumerian cosmology he was born of the union of An heaven and Ki earth. These he separated, and he carried off the earth as his portion. In later times he supplanted Anu as chief god. His consort is Ninlil with whom he has five children: Nanna, Nerigal, Ningirsu, Ninurta, and Nisaba.
Enlil holds possession of the Tablets of Destiny which gives him power over the entire cosmos and the affairs of man. He is sometimes friendly towards mankind, but can also be a stern and even cruel god who punishes man and sends forth disasters, such as the great Flood which wiped out humanity with the exception of Atrahasis. Enlil is portrayed wearing a crown with horns, symbol of his power. His most prestigious temple was in the city Nippur, and he was the patron of that city. His equivalent is the Akkadian god Ellil.


Ellil
by Micha F. Lindemans

The Akkadian god of earth and wind. He is the son of Ansar and Kisar, the primordial deities, and the father of the moon god Sin. Together with Ea and Anu he forms a powerful triad of gods in the ancient Mesopotamian religion. He is represented wearing a headband which is decorated with horns. He is equivalent to the Sumerian god Enlil.


Ellil is one of the most important gods of Mesopotamia. Ellil is so powerful that the other gods can't even look at him. He is therefore only shown as a horned cap. The Hebrews called him Elohim which means basically god. What is striking about the list of Sumerian kings is that the kings are divided into two groups - those who ruled before a great flood and those who ruled after it. Equally striking is that the lengths of the reigns (and life spans) of these kings drastically decreased after the flood, as did life spans of people recorded in the Bible. The very idea of a monotheistic god, the very fabric of Judaism and then Christianity was actually based on the Babylonian hierarchy of gods where Enlil was the god of air, land, earth, and men's fates. He later became the head of the gods. He was responsible for the Great Flood. Since all Indo European languages use the same root lemma for the sun god identical with Ellil, this is a proof that all Indo European languages derive from the same ancestor language spoken in Asia Minor. Illyrians could have been the first Indo Europeans to worship a sun god called Ellil. The simultaneous practice of Hittite and Illyrian priestly class to call a king Enlil means that those people shared the same kingship, the same customs and origin.

The first recorded Illyrian king was Hyllus (The Star) whose death was recorded in 1225 B.C. The deification of the first Illyrian king corresponds to the rein of the last Hittite king. The ancient custom of king deification was subsequently revived after the death of Bardylis who reigned from 385 to 358 BC. The deification tradition was refreshed after the death of Bardylis II - attested in 295 to 290 BC. There was another deification of Mytilius- attested about 270 BC. The last king to be deified was Skerdilaidas - who reigned from 212 to 206 BC. In Latin, Albanian and other Indo European tongues -il suffix lost its divine value and became a diminutive, marking affection.




The Illyrian King List

Hyllus (The Star) whose death was recorded in 1225 B.C.
Bardylis - Usurper and founder of this dynasty. Reigned 385 to 358 BC.
Grabus - Attested in 356 BC.
Pleuratus - Testified in 344 BC.
Kleitus - Son of Bardylis. Attested in 335 BC.
Glaukias - Ruler of the Taulanti and then Illyrian king from 317 to 303 BC.
Bardylis II - Attested in 295 to 290 BC he was the son of Kleitus.
Monunius - Attested in 280 BC.
Mytilius- Attested about 270 BC.
Pleuratus - Founder of this dynasty. Attested in 260 BC (?).
Agron - Son of Pleuratus. Reigned from 250 to 230 BC.
Pinnes - Reigned from 230 to 217 BC.
Skerdilaidas - Reigned from 212 to 206 BC.
Pleuratus - Son of Skerdilaidas. Reigned from 205 to 180 BC.
Gentius - Son of Pleuratus. Ruled from 180 to 168 BC.


Illyrians were not the first people to identify their king with a god. Virtually every great civilization employed the device of deification of its kings. Other cultures, namely Sumerians, Egyptians based their entire fabric of their society around a king who was believed to be god on earth. Yet of all Indo European people only Hittites and Illyrians employed the -ili suffix to denote the sacred nature of a dead king. Since the custom of calling a king 'god' came from Asia Minor it is natural to believe that Hittites and Illyrians stemmed from the same craddle of civilization. The elevation of kings to the status of a god is the tip of the iceberg since Illyrians (Albanians) and Hittites share their basic Indo European inherited root words. Both Hittites and Illyrians use the epithet alba 'white' to classify the white race of indo Europeans. Illyrians were named after their kinship to Ilios, Wilusa in Hittite texts. But they were also named Albanians 'white people' in contrast to other colored races in Mesopotamia.



ALBANIAN AN ILLYRIAN DIALECT

Ancient civilizations were organized around city states. People who lived around those city states were often named after the capital of their kingdom. Romans were initially called Latin but their name changed after their introduction of Romulus’ myth (the legendary founder of Rome) in the Etruscan capital of Alba Longa. Hittites were named after their capital Hattusas and their deified king was called Hattus-ili. Similarly Athenians were named the champion of their city, goddess Athena. Albanians (as one of innumerous Illyrian tribes) were named after their city state Albanopolis near a mountain called Alp 'mountain', Hittite alpa 'white'. The most spectacular name belonged to Dardanus (founder of Troy) because it is related to the myth of the Great Flood (which allegedly took place after the last ice age) hence it should be one of the oldest tribal names among Illyrians who like Greeks, Celts and Romans were obsessed with their divine ancestry. The origin of gods and myths of creation were not pure fantasy but instruments for survival. Ancient people were divided into two categories - those who were condemned to be slaves and those who were born to rule. Those people who failed to come up with a convincing divine lineage were often condemned to be slain, mutilated and exterminated. There was no mercy for godless ancestors. That is why Greeks embraced Hellen, Illyrians adored Hyllus and Romans worshiped Romulus. People even altered the myths, changed the names, ignored their real ancestors and abandoned inherited names to adopt new idols which were more fashionable at that time. It seems that the name Albania 'white' was not attractive enough to Albanians since it didn't carry any significant weight. Actually the descendants of Illyrians preferred another name - the imperial double headed eagle. Romans had always employed the single head eagle as their military ensign or standard. When Illyrian generals got elevated to the imperial throne they introduced the Hittite double headed eagle they had inherited from their Anatolian ancestors. (There is still a mountainous region in Albania called Hoti similar to ancient HATTI - the capital of Hittites.)

Hittites together with Persians probably borrowed the symbol of double headed eagle from an older civilization - Sumerian. Here there is the image of the double headed eagle at Persepolis - capital of the ancient Persian Empire.

The final proof that Illyrians had employed the double headed eagle before they introduced that symbol to Roman standards exists in the city of Sirkap (Pakistan). Along the main street of Sirkap, the ancient city, sits the Double-Headed Eagle Shrine. Its original name is lost, but is now referred to as the double-Headed Eagle Shrine because of the bird bas-relief that adorns the arch (images two and three). The Double-Headed Eagle Shrine was built by Macedonian, Greek and Illyrian soldiers. Alexander the Great employed Illyrian and Greek troops in his campaign to India.
The eagle was considered to be the sacred bird of Jupiter - the sky god among Indo Europeans.


http://web.archive.org/web/200801170052 ... lyrian/god

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:34 pm
by ALBPelasgian
sumerian
home page


The Sumerian King List


There are a number of versions of The Sumerian King List which do not always agree with each other. This version is based on an inscription on a block of stone found at the site of an ancient Sumerian city named Isin. It is an update of earlier Sumerian king lists, to add Isin’s kings to Sumer’s royal roster.

This list was inscribed during the reign of Damiqilishu of Isin (1816-1794 BCE). It presumed to be a list of kings from the beginning of history—when kingship was first handed down from Heaven. As the inscription was done only a few years before Hammurabi of Babylon captured the Land in the first half of the 18th century BCE and added it as a province to his new empire called Babylonia, it is virtually a complete list of the kings of the land once called Sumer.

The Sumerian King List is a mixture of fact and fantasy, including many historical kings confirmed by archaeology, but omitting others, and listing some contemporaneous dynasties as if they followed each other. The list below is paragraphed and formatted in modern style for ease of reading.


Kingship in Eridu

When kingship was first handed down from Heaven, the city of Eridu was chosen as the seat of kingship. In Eridu, Alulim ruled for 28,800 years as king and Alalgar ruled for 36,000 years. The two kings ruled a total of 64,800 years and then kingship was removed to Bad-tibira.


Kingship in Bad-tibira

In Bad-tibira, Enmenluanna ruled 43,200 years, Enmengalanna ruled 28,800 years and Dumuzi, the shepherd, ruled 36,000 years. The three kings ruled a total of 108,000 years and then kingship was removed to Larak.


Kingship in Larak

In Larak, Ensipazianna ruled 28,800 years before kingship was removed to Sippar.


Kingship in Sippar

In Sippar, Enmeduranna ruled 21,000 years and then Sippar was abandoned and its kingship removed to Shuruppak.


Kingship in Shuruppak

In Shuruppak, Ubartutu ruled 18,600 years and then The Flood came.


The Flood

Eight kings in five cities ruled 241,200 years before The Flood swept over the land.


Kingship in Kish

After The Flood, kingship was handed down from Heaven a second time, this time to the city of Kish which became the seat of kingship.

In Kish, Gaur ruled 1,200 years; Gulla-Nidaba-annapad ruled 960 years; Palakinatim ruled 900 years; Nangishkushma ruled 670 years, 3 months and 3˝ days;

Bahina ruled 300 years; Buanum ruled 840 years; Kalibum ruled 960 years; Galumum ruled 840 years; Zukakip ruled 900 years; Atab ruled 600 years; Mashda, the son of Atab, ruled 840 years; Arurim, the son of Mashda, ruled 720 years;

Etana, the shepherd who ascended to Heaven and made firm all the lands, ruled 1,560 years; Balih, the son of Etana, ruled 400 years;

Enmenunna ruled 660 years; Melam-Kish, the son of Enmenunna, ruled 900 years; Barsalnunna, the son of Enmenunna, ruled 1,200 years; Meszamug, the son of Barsalnunna, ruled 140 years; Tizkar, the son of Meszamug, ruled 305 years;

Ilku ruled 900 years; Iltasadum ruled 1,200 years; Enmebaraggesi, the king who smote the Land of Elam, ruled 900 years; Agga, the son of Enmebaraggesi, ruled 625 years.

All told, twenty-three kings ruled a total of 24,510 years, 3 months and 3˝ days before Kish was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Eanna.


Kingship in Eanna
(Eanna later became part of the city of Uruk)

After kingship was brought to Eanna, Meskiaggasher, the son of the Sun God, Utu (Shamash), ruled as both lord and king for 324 years during which time he entered the sea and climbed the mountains; Enmerkar, the son of Meskiaggasher, the king of Uruk who had founded Uruk, ruled for 420 years;

Lugalbanda, the shepherd, ruled for 1,200 years; Dumuzi, the fisherman who came from the city of Kuara, ruled 100 years; Gilgamesh, whose father was a nomad (?), ruled 126 years; Urnungal, son of Gilgamesh, ruled 30 years;
Udulkalamma, the son of Urnungal, ruled 15 years;

Labasher ruled 9 years; Ennundaranna ruled 8 years; Meshede, the smith, ruled 36 years; Melamanna ruled 6 years and Lugalkidul ruled 36 years.

All told, twelve kings ruled a total of 2,310 years in Eanna before Uruk was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Ur.


Kingship in Ur

After kingship was brought to Ur, Mesannepadda ruled for 80 years; Meskiagnunna, the son of Mesannepadda, ruled 36 years; Elulu ruled 25 years and Balulu ruled 36 years. All told, four kings ruled a total of 177 years before Ur was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Awan.


Kingship in Awan

After kingship was brought to Awan, ….. (text destroyed) ….. All told, three kings ruled a total of 356 years before Awan was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Kish.


Kingship in Kish (Second Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Kish, ….. ruled (more than) 201 years; Dadasig ruled 81 years; Mamagal ruled 420 years; Kalbum, the son of Mamagal, ruled 132 years; Tuge ruled 360 years; Mennumna ruled 180 years; Lugalmu ruled 420 years and Ibbi-Ea ruled 290 (?) years. All told, eight kings ruled a total of 3,195 years before Kish was defeated in battle and its kingship carried off to Hamazi.


Kingship in Hamazi

After kingship was brought to Hamazi, Hadanish ruled 360 years before Hamazi was defeated and its kingship carried off to Uruk.

Kingship in Uruk
(Including the ancient city of Eanna)

After kingship was brought to Uruk, Enshakanshanna ruled 60 years; Lugalure ruled 120 years and Argandea ruled 7 years. All told, three kings ruled a total of 187 years before Uruk was defeated and its kingship carried off to Ur.


Kingship in Ur (Second Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Ur, Nani ruled .. , Meshkiagnanna, son of Nani, ruled …. (text destroyed) ….. All told, four kings ruled a total of 116 (?) years before Ur was defeated and its kingship carried off to Adab.


Kingship in Adab

After kingship was brought to Adab, Lugalannemundu ruled 90 years before Adab was defeated and its kingship carried off to Mari.


Kingship in Mari

After kingship was brought to Mari, Ilshu ruled 30 years; ….. , the son of Ilshu, ruled 17 years; Bazi, the leatherworker, ruled 30 years; Zizi, the fuller, ruled 20 years; Limer, the gudu priest, ruled 30 years and Sharrumiter ruled 9 years. All told, six kings ruled a total of 136 years before Mari was defeated and its kingship carried off to Kish.


Kingship in Kish (Third Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Kish again, Ku-Bau, the innkeeper, she who made firm the foundations of Kish, ruled for 100 years as ‘king’ before Kish was defeated and its kingship carried off to Akshak.


Kingship in Akshak

After kingship was brought to Akshak, Unzi ruled 30 years; Undalulu ruled 12 years; Urur ruled 6 years; Puzur-Nirah ruled 20 years; Ishu-Il ruled 24 years and Shu-Sin, son of Ishu-Il, ruled 7 years. All told, six kings ruled for a total of 99 years before Akshak was defeated and its kingship carried off to Kish.


Kingship in Kish (Fourth Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Kish, Puzur-Sin, son of Ku-Bau, ruled 25 years; Ur-Zababa, son of Puzur-Sin, ruled 400 years; Simudarra ruled 30 years; Usiwatar, son of Simudarra, ruled 7 years; Ishtar-muti ruled 11 years; Ishme-Shamash ruled 11 years and Nannia, the stoneworker, ruled 7 years. All told, seven kings ruled 491 years before Kish was defeated and its kingship carried off to Uruk.


Kingship in Uruk (Second Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Uruk, Lugalzaggesi ruled for 25 years before Uruk was defeated and its kingship carried off to Agade.


Kingship in Agade

After kingship was brought to Agade, Sargon, whose father (?) was a gardener, the cupbearer of Ur-Zababa, founded Agade and ruled for 56 years as its king; Rimush, the son of Sargon, ruled 9 years; Manishtushu, a son of Sargon and the older brother of Rimush, ruled 15 years; Naram-Sin, son of Manishtushu, ruled 56 years and Sharkalisharri, son of Naram-Sin ruled 25 years.

Then, who was king? Who was not king? Igigi, Nanum, Imi and Elulu, the four of them were kings but ruled for a total of only 3 years. Dudu took control and ruled for 21 years and Shudurul, son of Dudu, ruled 15 years. All told, eleven kings ruled a total of 197 years before Agade was defeated and its kingship carried off to Uruk.


Kingship In Uruk (Third Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Uruk, Urnigin ruled 7 years; Urgigir, son of Urnigin, ruled 6 years; Kudda ruled 6 years; Puzur-ili ruled 5 years and Ur-Utu ruled 6 years. All told, five kings ruled a total of 30 years before Uruk was smitten by the Gutium Hordes and its kingship carried off by them.


The Gutium Hordes

After the Gutium Hordes seized kingship, everyone was his own king for 3 years; then Imta ruled 3 years; Inkishush ruled 6 years; Sarlagab ruled 6 years; Shulme ruled 6 years;

Elulumesh ruled 6 years; Inimbakesh ruled 5 years; Igeshaush ruled 6 years; Iarlagab ruled 15 years; Ibate ruled 3 years; Iarla ruled 3 years; Kurum ruled 1 year; Apilkin ruled 3 years; Laerabum ruled 2 years; Irarum ruled 2 years;

Ibranum ruled 1 year; Hablum ruled 2 years; Puzur-Sin, the son of Hablum, ruled 7 years; Iarlaganda ruled 7 years; ….. ruled 7 years and Tiriga (?) ruled 40 days. All told, twenty-one kings ruled 91 years and 40 days before the Gutium Hordes were defeated and kingship carried back to Uruk.


Kingship in Uruk (Fourth Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Uruk, Utuhegal ruled 7 years, 6 months and 15 days before Uruk was defeated and its kingship carried off to Ur.


Kingship in Ur (Third Dynasty)

After kingship was brought back to Ur, Ur-Nammu ruled 18 years; Shulgi, son of Ur-Nammu, ruled 48 years; Amar-Sin, son of Shulgi, ruled 9 years; Shu-Sin, son of Amar-Sin (an error for ‘son of Shulgi’), ruled 9 years and Ibbi-Sin, son of Shu-Sin, ruled 24 years. All told, five kings ruled for a total of 108 years before Ur was defeated and its kingship carried off to Isin.


Kingship in Isin

After kingship was brought to Isin, Ishbi-Erra ruled 33 years; Shuilishu, son of Ishbi-Erra, ruled 10 years; Idin-Dagan, son of Shuilishu, ruled 21 years; Ishme-Dagan, son of Idin-Dagan, ruled 20 years; Lipit-Ishtar, son of Ishme-Dagan, ruled 11 years;

Ur-Ninurta ruled 28 years; Bur-Sin, son of Ur-Ninurta, ruled 21 years; Lipit-Enlil, son of Bur-Sin, ruled 5 years; Erraimitti ruled 8 years; Enlil-bani ruled 24 years; Zambia ruled 3 years; Iterpisha ruled 4 years; Urdukuga ruled 4 years and Sinmagir ruled 11 years—all told, fourteen kings who ruled a total of 203 years.


The Sumerian King List Ends.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801130117 ... n/sumerian

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:35 pm
by ALBPelasgian
stories
home page



MYTHOLOGICAL STORIES


MYTHOLOGICAL STORIES CONCERNING THE NAME OF ILLYRIA
Marjeta Sasel Kos

Definitions of Illyria, Illyricum, and the Illyrians are still a puzzle in scholarly literature, despite several books having recently been written about the Illyrians, and partly perhaps because of this. The name must have carried a political prestige and contained a broad enough geographical and symbolic significance, as well as a kind of magnetism that it could denote, at the expense of other geographical names between Noricum and Pannonia on the one hand, and Epirus and Macedonia on the other, at one time or another so many different regions.

Appian of Alexandria, a Greek historian of the 2nd century AD, was the only ancient historian to have written a history of Illyria. Although he explicitly stated that many mythological stories concerning the name of Illyria were still circulating in his time, he chose for his audience a genealogical story, which included most of the peoples who inhabited the Illyricum of the Antonine era. They all descended from the son of Polyphemus and Galatea, Illyrius. Unfortunately, of all the stories referred to by Appian, merely one more concerning the eponymous ancestor of the Illyrians has to my knowledge been preserved to date; this is the legend of Cadmus and Harmonia and their son Illyrius.

By way of introduction, some other myths and legends related to the lands of Illyricum will be briefly considered, those which have a broader significance and are not only of limited local interest. Interestingly, all of them refer to the regions along the Adriatic, which additionally confirms the extreme importance of maritime routes used by travelers, merchants, and explorers; even northern ports may have been at least to some extent known to the Greeks at a relatively early date, while the interior of Illyria had for a long time remained terra incognita. These include the legend about the Hyperboreans, a mythical blessed northern race, dwelling beyond the mountains from where the northern wind blew, with whom Apollo had stayed for a period before his ceremonial arrival in Delphi, and further the legend about the return journey of the Argonauts. The worship of the Greek hero Diomedes was related to both Adriatic coasts, while the legend of the Trojan Antenor, whose route led him along Dalmatia, was particularly important for the history of Venetia and the western Adriatic coast. A legend has been preserved about the mysterious Ionius of the Illyrian race, the eponym for the Ionian (ie. the Adriatic) Sea; he may have once ruled over Issa, but according to the earlier variant he was inadvertently killed by Heracles in Dyrrhachium. Hercules was connected with other places along the eastern Adriatic coast, and so was his son Hyllus.

The most important passages follow, referring to the legends of Illyrius, the son of Cadmus and Harmonia, and Illyrius, the son of Polyphemus and Galatea.



Mythological Library of Pseudo-Apollodorus (3.39.2):



Cadmus accompanied by Harmonia left Thebes and went to the Enchelei. They were at war with the Illyrians who had attacked them, but they had been advised by a god that they would defeat the Illyrians if they were led by Cadmus and Harmonia. They trusted in the prophecy and appointed them as leaders against the Illyrians, who were then defeated. Cadmus ruled over Illyria and had a son Illyrius. Afterwards, together with Harmonia, he was turned into a serpent and Zeus conveyed him to the Elysian Fields?.

Commentary to Virgil’s Aeneid, Scholia Vaticana (to verse 1.243; II p. 311 Lion):

When Cadmus the son of Agenor, accompanied by his wife Harmonia, left Thebes, and bearing his unjust fate passed through the territory of Macedonia, he left a young son borne to him by Harmonia by the Illyrian River. A serpent twined around this son and, until he had grown, nursed him in the embrace of its body and filled him with the power to subdue this entire country. It named him Illyrius after itself.

Appian, Illyr. 2.3?4:

It is said that the country received its name from Polyphemus’ son Illyrius; the Cyclops Polyphemus and Galatea had the sons Celtus, Illyrius and Galas; they left Sicily and ruled over the peoples who were named after them: the Celts, the Illyrians, and the Galatians. This mythological story pleases me the most, although many others are also told by many writers. (4) Illyrius had the sons Encheleus, Autarieus, Dardanus, Maedus, Taulas, Perrhaebus and the daughters Partho, Daortho, Dassaro and others, from whom arose the peoples of the Taulantii, Perrhaebi, Enchelei, Autariatae, Dardanians [and Maedi], Partheni, Dassaretii and Darsi. Autarieus himself had a son Pannonius or Paeon, who in turn had Scordiscus and Triballus, from whom nations also were descended who were named after them. But I shall leave this subject to the antiquarians.




THE CULT OF ZEUS IN ANCIENT EPIRUS
Chryseis Tzouvara-Souli
The purpose of our communication is to give a multidimensional presentation of the cult of Zeus in Ancient Epirus from the prehistoric to the post-ancient times based both on the literary and epigraphic evidence and the archaeological data.

It follows that the main place of the cult of Zeus in Epirus is the sanctuary and oracle of Dodona which was the religious and political centre of the Epirote people.

From Dodona the cult of Zeus as spread to all Epirotic tribes from the Ambracian sea to the northern Aoos river and also beyond the borders of ancient Epirus to the adjacent areas as well ass to Athens and Magna Graecia and Sicily.

The factors contributing to the diffusion of the Epirotic cult in these areas should be sought in the vicinity with these regions, the geographic position of Epirus, the socio-politic situations and the broader religious policy of the Molossian kings, Alexander I and Pyrrhus.

Concurrently, we will point out the peculiarities of the cult, its ritual character and we will refer to the worshipping adjectives of Zeus.

Finally, the imperial cult, after the glorification of the Roman Emperors and the equation of Adrianus as Zeus of Dodona (Dodonaeus) in Nicopolis, echoes another dimension of the Zeus’s cult and states its importance and effect created to the Roman Emperors.





ALBANIAN MYTHOLOGY
by


Jonathan Michael


Ilitia
Ilitia or Eilitia, a daughter of Zeus and Hera, was sent by her mother to all women who gave birth, in order to help them through these difficult and decisive moments. In the Albanian mosaic called Beauty of Durrës and elsewhere, she is represented as a young girl surrounded by an ocean of flowers and carrying a lighted torch symbolising the new-born child. Ilitia was the universal metaphor of survival, writes the Albanian archaeologist Moikom Zeqo, who discovered the identity of the goddess shown in the Durrës mosaic, the contrary of death and oblivion.

Ilitia is the main representative of the Auras, goddesses of the air. They look like pagan angels with their wings on their shoulders, and they are all surrounded by flowers.

According to Barbara Walker, Ilithyia or Eileithyia is the epithet of the Great Goddess in her function of the divine midwife. During birth, women prayed to her as the liberator who freed the child from the womb.


Demeter
The veneration of this well-known goddess of the earth, with her mystery plays in Eleusis, was also quite common in Illyria. Albanologists claim that her name has to do with the Albanian word dhe, earth. Demeter, also called Damater, is thus literally Mother Earth, what describes exactly her role. It also corresponds to the Illyrian myth of creation, where the Earth as the basis of life gives birth to everything.

There is an inscription found near Plovdiv, Bulgaria, dedicated to Demeter, which, according to the albanologist Eqrem Çabej, can best be explained by means of the Albanian language derived from the Illyrian. It is a formula of Demeter’s cult, the cult of the Earth seen as universal mother, and means: Earth, hold me / hold on to me! I invite you to try out this part of spirituality rooted in ancient Albania. Pronounce or sing these magical words, if possible outside, in touch with Mother Earth. Use it as a prayer or a mantra, as a guideline of your meditation, in order to come back to earth from your spiritual flights or when you are stressed, in order to feel better that we all are a part of this globe and to feel the security and power that emanates from the Earth. Be careful: these words may have strong effects.

The ritual words of Demeter’s cult are: DA DALEME.


Melissa
We find the echo of matriarchy in the figure of Melissa and in the legend of the place of her union with the god of the sea, a maritime cult place, writes Zeqo about the foundation of the town of Durrës. Her worship was very popular among the Illyrian inhabitants of the town and its surroundings.

The legend tells that in a place called Melisonion, a certain Melissa was seduced by the god of the sea, Redon in Illyrian, and then gave birth to Durrah, one of the legendary founders of the seaport. Melissa, according to Appian, was the daughter of Epidamn, the first founder of the town. However, Melissa is more than just a simple girl. Zeqo adds that Melissa is the Greek word for bee, an animal which figures on old Illyrian coins, and calls her a nymph. Here we must bear in mind the fact that during the process of ideological patriarchalisation, female goddesses and divinities, in order to be replaced by male gods, either became a negative image (like the holy snake, which represents wisdom and the forces of the earth and which played a predominant role in Illyrian mythology) or were downgraded and thus denied importance. According to Walker, Melissa or queen bee was the title of Aphrodite’s Highest Priestess. Also the above mentioned Demeter was connected with bees, the honey-producing animals. Honey, a female-associated substance, besides its sweet and healing qualities, was considered as a substance for resurrection magic and is linked with rituals of many peoples’ mythologies. As for Aphrodite, originally she was not only the love goddess, but the threefold Great Goddess, the trinity of virgin, mother and old woman. She was said to be older than time and ruled the world according to matriarchal natural law.

These data throw a different light on the status of Melissa. We may even speculate about the Melisonion as being originally the place of a hieros gamos (holy wedding) ritual, where the union of the Goddess and the sea god created a town on the meeting point of land and sea, linking these two spheres.

By the way, Melissa tea, especially if you add honey, is a very healthy drink, calming you down and having a healing effect on a large scale of symptoms.


Diana
Every year in early spring, the German town of Heidelberg celebrates in a symbolical way the victory of spring over the winter king, who has to die and is burnt, represented by a straw puppet. This event is called Summer Day reminding a time where people distinguished only between two seasons, the cold and the warm one. The same day, with the same name Summer Day, is also celebrated in Albania, especially in the Central Albanian town of Elbasan. Here, however, the celebration is hold in the honour of the goddess Diana.

Diana or Artemis was a goddess of highest importance in Illyria. Her adoration shows the still relatively strong matriarchal character of Illyrian society. Near Elbasan there was a temple of Diana, marking the accomplished transition between Illyrian paganism in natural temples without walls and roofs (for example the Melisonion) and the classical Roman and Greek paganism with their built temples.

It is said that Diana took over the functions of a local goddess of vegetation and fertility and the seasons. Originally, however, Diana was not only the pretty virgin who goes hunting in the woods, but a representation of the Great Goddess, too, the trinity of the moon virgin, the mother of all beings and the destroying hunter.


Ika
It seems that Ika, a nymph or better river-related goddess with the attributes of Aphrodite, is the favorite goddess of many an Albanian nowadays, because in modern Albanian ika means I went away, I left...

Silke Blumbach

Main sources:

Barbara G. Walker, Das geheime Wissen der Frauen, München: dtv, 41997

Moikom Zeqo, Motive arkeologjike dhe shkrime të tjera, Tirana: 8

Nëntori, 1990.



Moikom Zeqo, Panteoni ilir, Tirana: Globus R, 1995.

Civilizations the world over have developed and perpetuated myths as a means of explaining natural phenomena and the mysteries of life and death itself. Though widely unknown, Albanian Mythology holds an intriguing blend of tales and legends, most dating back to the pagan beliefs of Ancient Illyria. Others have incorporated more blends of fictional beings addressing the many complexities of morality, good, and evil. At the beginning reside the Illyrian divinities of nature, constructed by our ancestors as a means of comprehending the world which surrounded them.

Many pan-cultural influences can be noted in some Albanian mythological characters. The lubi, --a monster holding the head of a lion, body of a goat, and tail of a serpent—is to the Greeks a chimera, while the ghostly kukuth holds similar powers to the Slavic vila. Even a variation of the very English Tom Thumb can be noted as resting akin to the Albanian tale of Kacilmic. Such similarities also exist between Illyrian Gods and Goddesses with those of other cultures. The Illyrian Goddess Diana, accompanied by a female goat (alb. dhia goat), was directly adopted by the Romans and holds a host of qualities to the Greek’s Artemus. Other divinities remained highly local. Enji, the God of fire (Agni in India), Surd, the God of weather, and Bindus that of water, were all creations of Illyrian reverence to the awesome powers of nature. Goddesses such as Medauras and Prema were held as the supreme beings to heal ailments and spawn fertility. Strangely, unlike the mythology of others, the Albanian strain developed without the cosmogenic view of how the world was created, nor the eschatological prophecies of how the world would end, and remained firmly terrestrial and centered on those things that could be touched or felt firsthand. The advent of Christian and Islamic lore brought belief in such deities to the end of their epoch in Albania and elsewhere. Myths such as Persius saving Andromeda from the Hydra for the most part were replaced by related religious ventures such as Saint George saving the princess of Sylene from being sacrificed to the dragon. If not for the work of such astronomers as Ptolemy Llagos of Illyria, who placed such stories literally into the heavens through the naming of constellations, such mythology would be even less recalled today.

Supplementing the acts of the Gods and Goddesses rests the mythology of the common man and the world?s evil they must face. Albanian Mythology is filled with a variety of monsters, ranging from mighty giants called Baloz, to tiny gnomes called Thopc who take delight in teasing people by turning them into animals. In such tales live witches known as shtrigas which cast spells and the Syni I keq. Female nymphs known as oras, whose glance can turn a man into stone, vampire-like lugats which live off human blood, and karkanxhols—half-man, half-wolf , which hunt shepherds under the full moon—are among the mythological personifications of evil in which folklore and superstition abound. Indeed, though made famous by the Germanic minority of Wallachia who were subjugated to the horrors of ruler Vlad Dracul, then later by the author Bram Stoker, it was Lord Byron who first related tales to Western Europeans of vampires. These tales were inspired by the folklore and tales he encountered while visiting Southern Albania.

To such vestiges of horror as lugats came the need for heroes with ingenious methods to combat them. Such heroes might themselves take the form of mere mortals, or those figures of mythology which were adhered to as good. Zanas, female mountain spirits which dwell near streams, have often been called upon to protect Albanian warriors. The deadly acts of kulshedras, a fire-breathing serpent with seven heads that pollutes the water, air, and soil, have for time immemorial been slain by drangues; human-like warriors with wings under their arms. When lacking such mythical interventions, Albanians have taken it upon themselves to combat evil with assorted amulets, herbs, magical stones, rings, and through such practices as shooting at the moon to ward off wolves. It is still the belief that to spit in a fire is taboo, and that one will be petrified if he breaks an oath made on a pledge stone.

Aspects of more modern and tangible calls for courage are highly represented in more recent forms of Albanian folklore, whereby the acts and deeds of real individuals become legendary, and take on almost mythical proportions. Typical in Southern Albania are the heroics of noble sons, burri I dheut, who took to battle against the overwhelming might of the Turk, as well as faithful women, bukura e dheut, who chose to jump to their death off of cliffs, their babies in arm, rather than be taken or even touched by the invader. The tales of Northern Albania generally focus on the common man’s battle with their Slavic neighbors. Songs and tales surround such characters as Muj, a shepherd who gains great powers by capturing three goats with golden horns, and in turn defeats the Slavs in battle. Upon his death, the enemy challenges him in his grave, from where he calls on his brother Halil to defeat them and return him to life. Other figures of mountain lore such as Oso Kuka, Marash Uci, and the brave maiden Tringa have been immortalized in the works of such writers as Gjergj Fishta, and represent battles for freedom and survival which are unfortunately still very prominent in the lives of the Albanian people to this day.


Historians about Illyria
Appian, The Foreign Wars (ed. Horace White)

THE ILLYRIAN WARS
CHAPTER I
Origin of the Illyrians - The Vengeance of Apollo - First Contact with the Romans


----------------------------------------

THE Greeks call those people Illyrians who occupy the region beyond Macedonia and Thrace from Chaonia and Thesprotia to the river Ister (Danube). This is the length of the country. Its breadth is from Macedonia and the mountains of Thrace to Pannonia and the Adriatic and the foot-hills of the Alps. Its breadth is five days' journey and its length thirty - so the Greek writers say. The Romans measured the country and found its length to be upward of 6000 stades and its width about 1200.

[2] They say that the country received its name from Illyrius, the son of Polyphemus; for the Cyclops Polyphemus and his wife, Galatea, had three sons, Celtus, Illyrius, and Galas, all of whom migrated from Sicily; and the nations called Celts, Illyrians, and Galatians took their origin from them. Among the many myths prevailing among many peoples this seems to me the most plausible. Illyrius had six sons, Encheleus, Autarieus, Dardanus, Mædus, Taulas, and Perrhæbus, also daughters, Partho, Daortho, Dassaro, and others, from whom sprang the Taulantii, the Perrhæbi, the Enchelees, the Autarienses, the Dardani, the Partheni, the Dassaretii, and the Darsii. Autarieus had a son Pannonius, or Pæon, and the latter had sons, Scordiscus and Triballus, from whom nations bearing similar names were derived. But I will leave these matters to the archæologists.

[3] The Illyrian tribes are many, as is natural in so extensive a country; and celebrated even now are the names of the Scordisci and the Triballi, who inhabited a wide region and destroyed each other by wars to such a degree that the remnant of the Triballi took refuge with the Getæ on the other side of the Danube, and, though flourishing until the time of Philip and Alexander, is now extinct and its name scarcely known in the regions once inhabited by it. The Scordisci, having been reduced to extreme weakness in the same way, and having suffered much at a later period in war with the Romans, took refuge in the islands of the same river. In the course of time some of them returned and settled on the confines of Pannonia, and thus it happens that a tribe of the Scordisci still remains in Pannonia. In like manner the Ardiæi, who were distinguished for their maritime power, were finally destroyed by the Autarienses, whose land forces were stronger, but whom they had often defeated. The Liburni, another Illyrian tribe, were next to the Ardiæi as a nautical people. These committed piracy in the Adriatic Sea and islands with their light, fast-sailing pinnaces, from which circumstance the Romans to this day call their own light, swift biremes liburnicas.

[4] The Autarienses were overtaken with destruction by the vengeance of Apollo. Having joined Molostimus and the Celtic people called Cimbri in an expedition against the temple of Delphi, the greater part of them were destroyed by storm, hurricane, and lightning just before the sacrilege was committed. Upon those who returned home there came a countless number of frogs, which filled the streams and polluted the water. The noxious vapors rising from the ground caused a plague among the Illyrians which was especially fatal to the Autarienses. At last they fled from their homes, and as the plague still clung to them (and for fear of it nobody would receive them), they came, after a journey of twenty-three days, to a marshy and uninhabited district of the Getæ, where they settled near the Bastarnæ. The god visited the Celts with an earthquake and overthrew their cities, and did not abate the calamity until these also fled from their abodes and made an incursion into Illyria among their fellow-culprits, who had been weakened by the plague. While robbing the Illyrians they caught the plague and again took to flight and plundered their way to the Pyrenees. When they were returning to the east the Romans, mindful of their former encounters with the Celts, and fearful lest they should cross the Alps and invade Italy, sent against them both consuls, who were annihilated with the whole army. This calamity to the Romans brought great dread of the Celts upon all Italy until Gaius Marius, who had lately triumphed over the Numidians and Mauritanians, was chosen commander and defeated the Cimbri repeatedly with great slaughter, as I have related in my Celtic history. Being reduced to extreme weakness, and for that reason excluded from every land, they returned home, inflicting and suffering many injuries on the way.

[5] Such was the punishment which the god visited upon the Illyrians and the Celts for their impiety. But they did not desist from temple robbing, for again, in conjunction with the Celts, certain Illyrian tribes, especially the Scordisci, the Mædi, and the Dardani again invaded Macedonia and Greece together, and plundered many temples, including that of Dephi, but losing many men this time also. The Romans, thirty-two years after their first encounter with the Celts, having fought with them at intervals since that time, now, under the leadership of Lucius Scipio, made war against the Illyrians, on account of this temple-robbery, as they [the Romans] now held sway over the Greeks and the Macedonians. It is said that the neighboring tribes, remembering the calamity that befell all the Illyrians on account of the crime of the Autarienses, would not give aid to the temple-robbers, but abandoned them to Scipio, who destroyed the greater part of the Scordisci, the remainder fleeing to the Danube and settling in the islands of that river. He made peace with the Mædi and Dardani, accepting from them part of the gold belonging to the temple. One of the Roman writers says that this was the chief cause of the numerous civil wars of the Romans after Lucius Scipio's time till the establishment of the empire. So much by way of preface concerning the peoples whom the Greeks called Illyrians.

[6] These peoples, and also the Pannonians, the Rhærtians, the Noricans, the Mysians of Europe, and the other neighboring tribes who inhabited the right bank of the Danube, the Romans distinguished from one another just as the various Greek peoples are distinguished from each other, and they call each by its own name, but they consider the whole of Illyria as embraced under a common designation. Whence this idea took its start I have not been able to find out, but it continues to this day, for they farm the tax of all the nations from the source of the Danube to the Euxine Sea under one head, and call it the Illyrian tax. Why the Romans subjugated them, and what were the real causes or pretexts of the wars, I acknowledged, when writing of Crete, that I had not discovered, and I exhorted those who were able to tell more, to do so. I shall write down only what I know.

-----------

CHAPTER II
First Illyrian War - Second Illyrian War - War with Genthius - War with the Dalmatians


----------------------------------------
Y.R. 524
[7] Agron was king of that part of Illyria which borders B.C. 230
the Adriatic Sea, over which sea Pyrrhus, king of Epirus, and his successors held sway. Agron captured a part of Epirus and also Corcyra, Epidamnus, and Pharus in succession, where he established garrisons. When he threatened the rest of the Adriatic with his fleet, the isle of Issa implored the aid of the Romans. The latter sent ambassadors to accompany the Issii and to ascertain what offences Agron imputed to them. The Illyrian vessels attacked the ambassadors on their voyage and slew Cleemporus, the envoy of Issa, and the Roman Coruncanius; the remainder escaped Y.R. 525
by flight. Thereupon the Romans invaded Illyria by land B.C. 229
and sea. Agron, in the meantime, had died, leaving an infant son named Pinnes, having given the guardianship and regency to his wife, although she was not the child's mother. Demetrius, who was Agron's governor of Pharus and who held Corcyra also, surrendered both places to the invading Romans by treachery. The latter then entered into an alliance with Epidamnus and went to the assistance of the Issii and of the Epidamnians, who were besieged by the Illyrians. The latter raised the siege and fled, and one of their tribes, called the Atintani, went over to the Romans. After these Y.R. 526
events the widow of Agron sent ambassadors to Rome to B.C. 228
surrender the prisoners and deserters into their hands. She begged pardon also for what had been done, not by herself, but by Agron. They received for answer that Corcyra, Pharus, Issa, Epidamnus, and the Illyrian Atintani were already Roman subjects, that Pinnes might have the remainder of Agron's kingdom and be a friend of the Roman people if he would keep hands off the aforesaid territory, and agree not to sail beyond Lissus nor to keep more than two Illyrian pinnaces, both to be unarmed. The woman accepted all these conditions.

[8] This was the first conflict and treaty between the Romans and the Illyrians. Thereupon the Romans made Corcyra and Apollonia free. To Demetrius they gave certain castles as a reward for his treason to his own people, adding the express condition that they gave them only conditionally, for they suspected the man's bad faith; and Y.R. 532
before long he began to show it. While the Romans were B.C. 222
engaged in a three years' war with the Gauls on the river Po, Demetrius, thinking that they had their hands full, set forth on a piratical expedition, brought the Istrians, another Illyrian tribe, into the enterprise, and detached the Atintani from Rome. The Romans, when they had settled their business with the Gauls, immediately sent a naval force and overpowered the pirates. The following year they marched against Demetrius and his Illyrian fellow-culprits. Demetrius fled to Philip, king of Macedon, but when he returned and resumed his piratical career in the Adriatic they slew him and utterly demolished his native town of Pharus, Y.R. 534
which was associated with him in crime. They spared the B.C. 220
Illyrians on account of Pinnes, who again besought them to do so. And such was the second conflict and treaty between them and the Illyrians.

[9] The following events I have written as I have found them, not in due order according to their times of occurrence, but rather taking each Illyrian nation separately. When the Romans were at war with the Macedonians during the reign of Perseus, the successor of Philip, Genthius, an Illyrian chief, made an alliance with Perseus for money and Y.R. 586
attacked Roman Illyria. When the Romans sent ambassadors B.C. 168
to him on this subject he put them in chains, charging that they had not come as ambassadors, but as spies. The Roman general, Anicius, in a naval expedition, captured some of Genthius' pinnaces and then engaged him in battle on land, defeated him, and shut him up in a castle. When he begged a parley Anicius ordered him to surrender himself to the Romans. He asked and obtained three days for consideration, at the end of which time, his subjects having meanwhile gone over to Anicius, he asked for an interview with the latter, and, falling on his knees, begged pardon in the most abject manner. Anicius encouraged the trembling wretch, lifted him up, and invited him to supper, but as he was going away from the feast he ordered the lictors to cast him into prison. Anicius afterward led both him and his sons in triumph at Rome. The whole war with Genthius was finished within twenty days. When Æmilius Paulus, the conqueror of Perseus, returned to Rome, he received secret orders from the Senate to go back on particular business relating to the seventy towns that Y.R. 587
had belonged to Genthius. They were much alarmed, but B.C. 167
he promised to pardon them for what they had done if they would deliver to him all the gold and silver they had. When they agreed to do so he sent a detachment of his army into each town appointing the same day for all the commanding officers to act, and ordering them to make proclamation at daybreak in each that the inhabitants should bring their money into the market-place within three hours, and when they had done so to plunder what remained. Thus Paulus despoiled seventy towns in one hour.

[10] The Ardei and the Palarii, two other Illyrian tribes, made a raid on Roman Illyria, and the Romans, being otherwise occupied, sent ambassadors to scare them. When they refused to be obedient, the Romans collected an army of 10,000 foot and 600 horse to be despatched against them. Y.R. 619
When the Illyrians learned this, as they were not yet prepared B.C. 135
for fighting, they sent ambassadors to crave pardon. The Senate ordered them to make reparation to those whom they had wronged. As they were slow in obeying, Fulvius Flaccus marched against them. This war resulted in an excursion only, for I cannot find any definite end to it. Y.R. 625
Sempronius Tuditanus and Tiberius Pandusa waged war B.C. 129
with the Iapydes, who live among the Alps, and seem to Y.R. 635
have subjugated them, as Lucius Cotta and Metellus seem B.C. 119
to have subjugated the Segestani; but both tribes revolted not long afterward. Y.R. 598

[11] The Dalmatians, another Illyrian tribe, made an B.C. 156
attack on the Illyrian subjects of Rome, and when ambassadors were sent to them to remonstrate they were not received. The Romans accordingly sent an army against them, with Marcius Figulus as consul and commander. While Figulus was laying out his camp the Dalmatians over-powered the guard, defeated him, and drove him out of the camp in headlong flight to the plain as far as the river Naro. As the Dalmatians were returning home (for winter was now approaching), Figulus hoped to fall upon them unawares, but he found them reassembled from their towns at the news of his approach. Nevertheless, he drove them into the city of Delminium, from which place they first got the name of Delmatenses, which was afterward changed to Dalmatians. As he was not able to attack this strongly defended town from the road, nor to use the engines that he had, on account of the height of the place, he attacked and captured some other towns that were partially deserted on account of the concentration of forces at Delminium. Then, returning to Delminium, he hurled sticks of wood, two cubits long, covered with flax and smeared with pitch and sulphur, from catapults into the town. These caught fire from friction and, flying in the air like torches, wherever they fell caused a conflagration, so that the greater part of the town was burned. This was the end of the war waged by Figulus against the Dalmatians. At a later period, in Y.R. 635
the consulship of Cæcilius Metellus, war was declared B.C. 119
against the Dalmatians, although they had been guilty of no offence, because he desired a triumph. They received him as a friend and he wintered among them at the town of Salona, after which he returned to Rome and was awarded a triumph.

------------------

CHAPTER III
Julius Cæsar and the Illyrians - The Pannonians on the Danube


----------------------------------------

[12] At the time when Cæsar held the command in Gaul these same Dalmatians and other Illyrians, who were then in a very prosperous condition, took the city of Promona Y.R. 704
from the Liburni, another Illyrian tribe. The latter put B.C. 50
themselves in the hands of the Romans and appealed to Cæsar, who was near by. Cæsar sent word to those who were holding Promona that they should give it up to the Liburni, and when they refused, he sent against them a strong detachment of his army who were totally destroyed by the Illyrians. Nor did Cæsar renew the attempt, for he had no leisure then, on account of the civil strife with Pompey. When the civil strife burst forth in war Cæsar crossed the Adriatic from Brundusium in the winter, with what forces he had, and opened his campaign against Pompey in Macedonia. Antony brought another army to Cæsar's aid in Macedonia, he also crossing the Adriatic in mid-winter. Gabinius led fifteen cohorts of foot and 3000 horse for him by way of Illyria, passing around the Adriatic. Y.R. 706
The Illyrians, fearing punishment for what they had done B.C. 48
to Cæsar not long before, and thinking that his victory would be their destruction, attacked and slew the whole army under Gabinius, except Gabinius himself and a few who escaped. Among the spoils captured was a large amount of money and war material.

[13] Cæsar was preoccupied by the necessity of coming to a conclusion with Pompey, and, after Pompey's death, with the numerous parts of his faction still remaining. When he had settled everything he returned to Rome and made preparations for war with the Getæ and the Parthians. The Illyrians began to fear lest he should attack them, as they were on his intended line of march. So they sent ambassadors to Rome to crave pardon for what they had done and to offer their friendship and alliance, vaunting themselves Y.R. 709
as a very brave race. Cæsar was hastening his preparations B.C. 45
against the Parthians; nevertheless, he gave them the dignified answer that he could not make friends of those who had done what they had, but that he would grant them pardon if they would subject themselves to tribute and give him hostages. They promised to do both, and accordingly he sent Vatinius thither with three legions and a large cavalry force to impose a light tribute on them and receive the Y.R. 710
hostages. When Cæsar was slain the Dalmatians, thinking B.C. 44
that the Roman power resided in him and had perished with him, would not listen to Vatinius on the subject of the tribute or anything else. When he attempted to use force they attacked and destroyed five of his cohorts, including their commanding officer, Bæbius, a man of senatorial rank. Vatinius took refuge with the remainder of his force in Epidamnus. The Roman Senate transferred this army, together with the province of Macedonia and Roman Illyria, to Brutus Cæpio, one of Cæsar's murderers, and at the same time assigned Syria to Cassius, another of the assassins. But they also, being involved in war with Antony and the second Cæsar, surnamed Augustus, had no time to attend to the Illyrians.

[14] The Pæones are a great nation on the Danube, extending from the Iapydes to the Dardani. They are called Pæones by the Greeks, but Pannonians by the Romans. They are counted by the Romans as a part of Illyria, as I have previously said, for which reason it seems proper that I should include them in my Illyrian history. They have been renowned from the Macedonian period through the Agrianes, who rendered very important aid to Philip and Alexander and are Pæones of Lower Pannonia bordering on Illyria. When the expedition of Cornelius against the Pannonians resulted disastrously, so great a fear of those people came over all the Italians that for a long time afterwards none of the consuls ventured to march against them. Concerning the early history of the Illyrians and Pannonians, I have not been able to discover anything further, nor have I found in the commentaries of Augustus anything earlier in the chapters treating of the Pannonians.

[15] I think that other Illyrian tribes besides those mentioned had previously come under Roman rule, but how, I do not know. Augustus did not describe the transactions of others so much as his own, telling how he brought back those who had revolted and compelled them again to pay tribute, how he subjugated others that had been independent from the beginning, and how he mastered all the tribes that inhabit the summits of the Alps, barbarous and warlike peoples, who often plundered the neighboring parts of Italy. It is a wonder to me that so many great Roman armies traversing the Alps to conquer the Gauls and Spaniards, should have overlooked these tribes, and that even Gaius Cæsar, that most successful man of war, did not despatch them during the ten years that he was fighting the Gauls and wintering in that very country. But the Romans seem to have been intent only upon getting through the Alpine region on the business they were bestirring themselves about, and Cæsar seems to have delayed putting an end to the Illyrian troubles on account of the Gallic war and the strife with Pompey, which closely followed it. It appears that he was chosen commander of Illyria as well as of Gaul - not the whole of it, but as much as was then under Roman rule.

------------
CHAPTER IV
Augustus invades Illyria - Subjugation of the Salassi and of the Iapydes - Hard Fighting at Metulus - Destruction of the City - War aggainst the Segestani - Their City Captured


----------------------------------------

[16] When Augustus had made himself master of everything, he informed the Senate, by way of contrast with Antony's slothfulness, that he had freed Italy from the savage tribes that had so often raided it. He overcame the Oxyæi, the Perthoneatæ, the Bathiatæ, the Taulantii, the Cambæi, the Cinambri, the Meromenni, and the Pyrissæi in one campaign. By more prolonged effort he also over-came the Docleatæ, the Carui, the Interphrurini, the Naresii, the Glintidiones, and the Taurisci. From these tribes he exacted the tributes they had been failing to pay. When these were conquered, the Hippasini and the Bessi, neighboring tribes, were overcome by fear and surrendered themselves to him. Others which had revolted, the Meliteni and the Corcyreans, who inhabited islands and practised piracy, he destroyed utterly, putting the young men to death and selling the rest as slaves. He deprived the Liburnians of their ships because they also practised piracy. Y.R. 719
The Mœntini and the Avendeatæ,two tribes of the Iapydes, B.C. 35
dwelling within the Alps, surrendered themselves to him at his approach. The Arrepini, who are the most numerous and warlike of the Iapydes, betook themselves from their villages to their city, but when he arrived there they fled to the woods. Augustus took the city, but did not burn it, hoping that they would deliver themselves up, and when they did so he allowed them to occupy it.

[17] Those who gave him the most trouble were the Salassi, the transalpine Iapydes, the Segestani, the Dalmatians, the Dæsitiatæ, and the Pannonians, far distant from the Salassi, who occupy the higher Alpine mountains, difficult of access, the paths being narrow and hard to climb. For this reason they had not only preserved their independence, but had levied tolls on those who passed through their country. Vetus assaulted them unexpectedly, seized the passes by stratagem, and besieged them for two years. They were driven to surrender for want of salt, which they use largely, and they received a Roman garrison; but when Vetus went away they expelled the garrison forthwith, and, possessing themselves of the mountain passes, they mocked at the forces that Augustus sent against them, as unable to accomplish anything of importance. Thereupon Augustus, anticipating a war with Antony, acknowledged their independence and allowed them to go unpunished for their offences against Vetus. But as they were suspicious of what might happen, they laid in large supplies of salt and made Y.R. 720
incursions into the Roman territory until Messala Corvinus B.C. 34
was sent against them and reduced them by hunger. In this way were the Salassi subjugated. Y.R. 719

[18] The transalpine Iapydes, a strong and savage tribe, drove back the Romans twice within the space of about twenty years, overran Aquileia, and plundered the Roman colony of Tergestus. When Augustus advanced against them by a steep and rugged road, they made it still harder for him by felling trees. As he advanced farther they took refuge in another forest, where they lay in ambush for the approaching foe. Augustus, who was always suspecting something of this kind, sent forces to occupy certain ridges which flanked both sides of his advance through the flat country and the fallen timber. The Iapydes darted out from their ambush and wounded many of the soldiers, but B.C. 35
the greater part of their own forces were killed by the Romans who fell upon them from the heights above. The remainder again took refuge in the thickets, abandoning their town, the name of which was Terponus. Augustus took this town, but did not burn it, hoping that they also would give themselves up, and they did so.

[19] Thence he advanced to another place called Metulus, which is the chief town of the Iapydes. It is situated on a heavily timbered mountain, on two ridges with a narrow valley between them. Here were about 3000 warlike and well-armed youth, who easily beat off the Romans who surrounded their walls. The latter raised a mound. The Metulians interrupted the work by assaults by day and by night, and harassed the soldiers from the walls with engines which they had obtained from the war which Decimus Brutus1 had waged there with Antony and Augustus. When their wall began to crumble they built another inside, abandoned the ruined one, and took shelter behind the other. The Romans captured the abandoned one and burned it. Against the new fortification they raised two mounds and from these threw four bridges to the top of the wall. Then, in order to distract their attention, Augustus sent a part of his force around to the rear of the town and ordered the others to dash across the bridges to the walls. He ascended to the top of a high tower to see the result.

[20] Some of the barbarians ran from the parapet to meet the Romans who were crossing, while others, unseen, sought to undermine the bridges with their long spears. They were much encouraged at seeing one bridge fall and a second one follow on top of it. When a third one went down a regular panic overtook the Romans, so that no one ventured on the fourth bridge until Augustus leaped down from the tower and reproached them. As they were not roused to their duty by his words, he seized a shield and sprang upon the bridge himself. Agrippa and Hiero, two of the generals, and one of his bodyguard, Lucius, and Volas ran with him, only these four with a few armor-bearers. He had almost crossed the bridge when the soldiers, overcome by shame, rushed after him in crowds. Then this bridge, being overweighted, fell also, and the men on it went down in a heap. Some were killed and others were carried away with broken bones. Augustus was injured in the right leg and in both arms. Nevertheless, he ascended the tower with his signals forthwith and showed himself safe and sound, lest dismay should arise from a report of his death. In order that the enemy might not fancy that he was going to give in and retire he began to construct new bridges; by which means he struck terror into the Metulians, who thought that they were contending against an unconquerable will.

[21] The next day they sent messengers to Augustus offering to give fifty hostages whom he might select, and promising to receive a garrison and to assign to them the highest hill while they themselves would occupy the other. When the garrison entered and he ordered them to lay down their arms they were very angry. They shut their wives and children up in their council-chamber and stationed guards there with orders to set fire to the building in case things went wrong with them, and then they attacked the Romans with desperation. Since, however, they made the attack from a lower position upon those occupying higher ground, they were completely overpowered. Then the guards set fire to the council-chamber and many of the women killed their children and themselves. Others, holding in their arms their children still alive, leaped into the flames. Thus all the Metulian youth perished in battle and the greater part of the non-combatants by fire. Their city was entirely consumed, and, large as it was, not a trace of it now remains. After the destruction of Metulus the remainder of the Iapydes, being terror-stricken, surrendered to Augustus. The transalpine Iapydes were then for the first time brought in subjection to the Romans. After Augustus departed the Poseni Y.R. 720
rebelled and Marcus Helvius was sent against them. He B.C. 34
conquered them and after punishing the leaders of the revolt with death sold the rest as slaves. Y.R. 719

[22] At an earlier time the Romans twice attacked the B.C. 35
country of the Segestani, but obtained no hostages nor anything else, for which reason the Segestani became very arrogant. Augustus advanced against them through the Pannonian territory, which was not yet under subjection to the Romans. Pannonia is a wooded country extending from the Iapydes to the Dardani. The inhabitants do not live in cities, but scattered through the country or in villages according to relationship. They have no common council and no rulers over the whole nation. They number 100,000 fighting men, but they do not assemble in one body, because they have no common government. When Augustus advanced against them they took to the woods, from which they darted out and slew the stragglers of the army. As long as Augustus hoped that they would surrender voluntarily he spared their fields and villages. As none of them came in he devastated the country with fire and sword for eight days, until he came to the Segestani. Theirs is also Pannonian territory, on the river Save, on which is situated a city strongly fortified by the river and by a very large ditch encircling it. For this reason Augustus greatly desired to possess it as a magazine convenient for a war against the Dacians and the Bastarnæ on the other side of the Ister, which is there called the Danube, but a little lower down is called the Ister. The Save flows into it, and Augustus caused ships to be built in the latter stream to bring provisions to the Danube for him.

[23] For these reasons he desired to obtain possession of Segesta. As he was approaching, the Segestani sent to inquire what he wanted. He replied that he desired to station a garrison there and to have them give him 100 hostages in order that he might use the town safely as a base of operations in his war against the Dacians. He also asked for as much food as they were able to supply. The chief men of the town acquiesced, but the common people were furious, yet consented to the giving of the hostages, perhaps because they were not their children, but those of the notables. When the garrison came up, however, they could not bear the sight of them, but shut the gates in a mad fury and stationed themselves on the walls. Thereupon Augustus bridged the river and surrounded the place with ditch and palisade, and, having blockaded them, raised two mounds. Upon these the Segestani made frequent assaults and, being unable to capture them, endeavored to destroy them with torches and fire thrown from above. When aid was sent to them by the other Pannonians Augustus met and ambuscaded this reënforcement, destroyed a part of their force, and put the rest to flight. After this they got no more help from the Pannonians.

[24] Thus the Segestani, after enduring all the evils of a siege, were taken by force on the thirtieth day, and then for the first time they began to beg. Augustus, admiring them for their bravery and yielding to their prayers, neither killed nor banished them, but contented himself with a fine. He caused a part of the city to be separated from the rest by a wall, and in this he placed a garrison of twenty-five cohorts. Having accomplished this he went back to Rome, intending to return to Illyria in the spring. But a rumor becoming current that the Segestani had massacred the garrison, he set forth hastily in the winter. However, he found that the rumor was false, yet not without cause. They had been in danger from a sudden uprising of the Segestani and had lost many men by reason of its unexpectedness, but on the next day they rallied and put down the insurgents. Augustus turned his forces to Dalmatia, another Illyrian country bordering on Taulantia.


----------------------------------------

1 All the codices say, "Decimus Brutus." The Latin version of Candidus omits "Decimus." Decimus Brutus did not wage war against Antony and Octavius in Illyria. He fought against Antony in Cisalpine Gaul and was killed there, while trying to escape to Illyria, as we learn from our author (Civil Wars, iii. 98) and numerous other authorities.
---------------------

CHAPTER V
Second War against the Dalmatians - The City of Promona taken - Sunodium burned - The Dalmatians subdued


----------------------------------------
Y.R. 720
[25] The Dalmatians, after the slaughter of the five cohorts under Gabinius and the taking of their standards, elated by their success, had not laid down their arms for ten years. When Augustus advanced against them they made an alliance with each other for mutual aid in war. They had upwards of 12,000 fighting men under a general named Versus. He occupied Promona, the city of the Liburni, and fortified it, although it was very strong by nature. It is a mountain stronghold surrounded on all sides by sharp-pointed hills like saw-teeth. The greater part of his forces were stationed in the town, but he placed guards on the B.C. 34
hills and all of them looked down upon the Romans from elevated positions. Augustus in plain sight began to draw a wall around the whole, but secretly he sent his bravest men to seek a path to the highest of the hills. These, concealing themselves in the woods, fell upon the guards by night while they were asleep, slew them, and signalled to Augustus in the twilight. He led the bulk of the army to make an attempt upon the city, and sent another force to hold the height that had been taken, while the captors of it should get possession of the lower hills. Terror and confusion fell upon the barbarians everywhere, for they believed themselves to be attacked on all sides. Especially were those on the hills alarmed lest they should be cut off from their supply of water, for which reason they all fled to Promona.

[26] Augustus surrounded the town, and two hills which were still held by the enemy, with a wall forty stades in length. When Testimus, another Dalmatian general, brought an army to the relief of the place Augustus met him and drove him back to the mountains, and while Testimus was still looking on he took Promona before the line of circumvallation was finished. For when the citizens made a sally and were sharply repulsed, the Romans pursued them and entered the town with them, where they killed a third part of them. The remainder took refuge in the citadel, at the gates of which a Roman cohort was placed to keep watch. On the fourth night the barbarians asaulted them, and they fled terror-stricken from the gates. Augustus repulsed the enemy's assault, and the following day received their surrender. The cohort that had abandoned its position was obliged to cast lots, and every tenth man suffered death. The lot fell upon two centurions among others. It was ordered, as a further punishment, that the surviving members of the cohort should subsist on barley instead of wheat for that summer.

[27] Promona being thus taken, Testimus, who was still looking on, disbanded his army, telling them to scatter in all directions. For this reason the Romans were not able to pursue them long, as they feared to divide themselves into small bands, being ignorant of the roads, and the foot-prints of the fugitives being much confused. They took the town of Sunodium at the edge of the forest in which the army of Gabinius had been entrapped by the Dalmatians in a long and deep gorge between two mountains. There also they laid an ambuscade for Augustus, but after he had burned Sunodium he sent soldiers around by the summits of the mountains to keep even pace with him on either side while he passed through the gorge. He cut down trees and captured and burned all the towns he found on his way. While he was besieging the city of Setovia a force of barbarians came to its assistance, which he met and prevented from entering the place. In this conflict he was struck by a stone on the knee and was confined for several days. When he recovered he returned to Rome to perform the duties of the consulship with Volcatius Tullus, his colleague, leaving Statilius Taurus to finish the war. Y.R. 721

[28] Entering upon his new consulship on the Calends B.C. 33
of January, and delivering the government to Autronius Pætus the same day, he started back to Dalmatia at once, the triumvirate still existing; for two years remained of the second five-year period which the triumvirs themselves had ordained and the people confirmed. And now the Dalmatians, oppressed by hunger and cut off from foreign supplies, met him on the road and delivered themselves up with supplications, giving 700 of their children as hostages, as Augustus demanded, and also the Roman standards taken from Gabinius. They also promised to pay the tribute that had been in arrears since the time of Gaius Cæsar and to be obedient henceforth. Augustus deposited the standards in the portico called the Octavia. After the Dalmatians were prostrated Augustus advanced against the Derbani, who likewise begged pardon with supplications, gave hostages, and promised to pay the past-due tribute.1 In like manner other tribes at his approach gave hostages for observing the treaties that he made with them. Some, however, he was prevented by sickness from reaching. These gave no hostages and made no treaties. It appears, however, that they were subjugated later. Thus Augustus subdued the whole Illyrian country, not only the parts that Y.R. 725
had revolted from the Romans, but those that had never B.C. 29
before been under their rule. Wherefore the Senate awarded him an Illyrian triumph, which he enjoyed later, together with one for his victory over Antony.

[29] The remaining peoples, who are considered by the Romans to be parts of Illyria, are the Rhætians and the Noricans, on this side of Pannonia, and the Mysians on the other side as far as the Euxine Sea. I think that the Rhætians and Noricans were subdued by Gaius Cæsar during the Gallic war or by Augustus during the Pannonian war, as they lie between the two. I have found no mention of any war against them separately, whence I infer that they were conquered along with other neighboring tribes.

[30] Marcus Lucullus, brother of that Licinius Lucullus who conducted the war against Mithridates, advanced against the Mysians and arrived at the river where six Grecian cities lie adjacent to the Mysian territory, namely, Istrus, Dionysopolis, Odessus, Mesembria, Catalis, and Apollonia;2 from which he brought to Rome the great statue of Apollo which was afterward set up on the Palatine Hill. I have found nothing further done by the Roman republic as to the Mysians. They were not subjected to tribute by Augustus, but by Tiberius, who succeeded him as Roman emperor. All the things done by command of the people before the taking of Egypt have been written by me for each country separately. Those countries that the emperors themselves pacified after Egypt was taken, or annexed as their own work, will be mentioned after the affairs of the commonwealth. There I shall tell more about the Mysians. For the present, since the Romans consider the Mysians a part of Illyria and this is my Illyrian history, in order that it may be complete it seems proper to premise that Lucullus invaded Mysia as a general of the republic and that Tiberius took it in the time of the empire.

----------------
http://web.archive.org/web/200801160000 ... an/stories

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:36 pm
by ALBPelasgian
THE ORIGIN OF RACISM IN EUROPE

The history of Greece the history of racism
Greeks invent the notion of inferior races
Greek supremacy against the barbarian Europe


SLAVES
The vast majority of Greeks from Homer to Aristotle regarded slavery as an indisputable fact of life. Its existence at the heart of the Classical world is thus a source of considerable disquiet to those who admire Greek culture for its supposedly enlightened humanism. It is important to appreciate, however, that slavery was not an absolute condition but one that admitted many different statuses. It included at one end of the scale chattel slaves, those who in Aristotle's telling phrase had the same (6,000 drachmas) for a slave to manage his silver mines. A slave in good health probably cost the equivalent of half a year's salary. The inscription relating to the sale of confiscated property that belonged to the Mutilators of, Herms in 414 B.C. prices a Syrian male at 240 drachmas, a Thracian female at 220 drachmas, and "a little Carian boy" at 72 drachmas. Though most Athenian slaves were purchased from abroad, some were bred in captivity, as indicated by the following remark made by Ischomachos in Xenophon's, Household Management: "As a general rule, if good slaves are permitted to breed, their loyalty increases, whereas when bad slaves live together as husband and wife they are more liable to cause trouble" (9.5).
Domestic Slaves
Domestic slaves served in practically every capacity, including that of washerwoman, cook, porter, cleaner, tutor, Domestic escort, messenger, nurse, and companion. No doubt in the Slaves larger households there was some division of labor, as for instance among the female slaves in the palace of the Homeric king Alkinoös, "some of whom grind the yellow grain on the millstone, while others weave the web and turn the spindle" (Odyssey 7.104f.). Whether slaves were also employed in large numbers as agricultural laborers is unclear.
On becoming a member of an Athenian household, a slave underwent an initiation ceremony similar to that which a bride underwent on first entering her new home. This was intended to place the slave under the protection of Hestia, the goddess of the hearth. The poems of Homer suggest that close ties arose between master and slave. When, for instance, Odysseus reveals himself to his faithful slaves Eumaios and Philoitios on his return to Ithaca after twenty years, they throw their arms around him and kiss him (Odyssey 21.222-25). Scenes of mistress and maid figure prominently on Athenian grave monuments, testimony to the fact that the two spent much time together in the gynaikeion, or women's quarters. In Classical Athens slaves were occasionally buried in family plots beside their masters and mistresses.
Overall the treatment of slaves varied greatly from one household to the next. Though Athenian slaves were protected by the law against violent abuse, in practice it was virtually impossible for them to lodge a complaint against their masters, since they-could not represent themselves in court. Starvation and flogging were regular punishments for bad behavior. A runaway slave was branded with a hot iron upon capture. If a slave was required to be a witness in a lawsuit, his or her testimony could be accepted only under torture.
Though we lack any account written by a slave telling us what he or she felt about his or -her condition, Aristophanes in Frogs provides us with an insight into the kind of gossip that slave owners imagined their status as "an animate or ensouled piece of property" (Politics 1253b 33), and at the other end those who lived independently and remitted a part of their income to their masters.
The Origins of Slavery
The origins of slavery are not precisely understood, but The Origins the institution was certainly in existence by the end of the of Slavery eighth century B.C. In the world evoked by the Homeric poems most slaves were obtained by piracy, kidnapping, or warfare. Odysseus' swineherd Eumaios, for instance, was captured and sold into slavery as a child. Enslavement is the fate that awaits the female members of the royal household when Troy is taken. It would also have been the fate of women and children in historical times when a besieged city fell. In seventh century B.C. Greece, slavery appears to have been widespread even among the poorest section of society. Hesiod, in Works and Days (line 405f.), is of the opinion that an ox and a bought woman are an essential part of a small farmer's holding.
The Size of Athens' Slave Population
Slaves were particularly numerous in Athens and may The Size of well have outnumbered those in any other Greek com Athens' Slave communities. Thukydides (7.27.5) claims that "more than Population 20,000," most of them manual workers, absconded to De keleia in northern Attica when it was occupied by the Spartans in 413 B.C. All other evidence is anecdotal. In Classical times the possession of at least one slave was regarded as a necessity. In a lawsuit written by Lysias the speaker states, "I have a trade but I don't earn much. I find it difficult making ends meet and I can't save enough money to buy a slave to do the work for me" (24.6). It is a mark of his meanness that Theophrastos' Tight-Fisted Man refuses to buy his wife a slave girl and instead hires one from the women's market (Characters 22.10). The majority of well-to-do Athenians probably owned two or three slaves, whereas the wealthy possessed between ten and twenty. A few, however, owned a great many more. Nikias, one of the richest men in Athens in the late fifth century B.C., owned 1,000 slaves, whom he leased out to fellow citizens at the rate of one obol per slave per day (Xenophon, Revenues 4.14). The only surviving slave census relates to Athens in the late fourth century B.C. The total, which is put at 400,000, exceeds all bounds of credibility.
The Racial Diversity of Athen's Slaves
Athenian slaves were imported from a wide variety of regions including Thrace, Scythia, Illyria, Colchis, Syria, Caria, and Lydia. Such diversity was probably fairly typical. The purchase price of a slave varied according to his or her skills and looks. Obviously an educated slave who could read and write fetched considerably more than one who was only good for menial duties. Likewise a pretty young girl cost much more than an ugly old hag. Slaves with management skills were extremely expensive. Nikias, whom we mentioned above, paid a talent
Slave A: I'm absolutely thrilled when I can curse my master behind his back.
Slave B: What about grumbling as you're going outside after being beaten? Slave A: That's great!
Slave B: What about not minding your own business?
Slave A: That's terrific!
Slave B: You're a man after my own heart. What about eavesdropping when he's having a private conversation?
Slave A: That's enough to drive me wild with delight!
Slave B: What about gossiping to your friends about what you discover? Do you like that?
Slave A: Do I like it? By Zeus, that's enough to make me wet my knickers! (lines 746-53)
Publicly Owned Slaves
The most privileged Athenian slaves were owned by the state. They included the notaries, jury clerks, coin testers, and exe cutioner. In addition, a large number of publicly owned slaves toiled as road menders. As building accounts make clear, slaves sometimes worked on building projects alongside Athe nian citizens. Athens' force of Skythian archers, who kept the peace, was also the property of the state.
Living Separately
Because Athenian citizens refused to satisfy the demand for Living wage labor in the second half of the fifth century B.C., conditions and opportunities for a limited number of slaves improved dramatically. Such slaves, who paid a commission to their owners, were described as "living separately" (ch6ris oikountes). They included the managers of shops and factories; bankers, captains of trading vessels, bailiffs, and artisans. One was a certain Pasion, who rose to be one of the wealthiest men in Athens. Pasion, who worked as a banker, was eventually granted Athenian citizenship because he gave generously to the state at a time of crisis. Overall, however, the Athenians were niggardly in freeing their slaves, even when they had served them dutifully all their life.
Industrial Slaves
The most dangerous and exhausting work performed by Industrial Athenian slaves was in the silver mines of Lavrion in south-east Attica. Inscriptions reveal that the vast majority of in dustrial slaves were barbarians. Xenophon (Memorabilia 2.5.2) informs us that the price of slaves who served in this capacity could be as low as 50 drachmas. Work in the mines continued uninterruptedly for twenty-four hours a day. From the discovery of miners' lamps containing oil, it has been estimated that shifts were ten hours in length.
Conclusions
Though it had its critics, the institution of slavery was never seriously challenged in the ancient world. Even philosophers such as the Cynics and Stoics, who professed to believe in the brotherhood of mankind, were muted in their opposition. In the Politics, Aristotle goes so far as to justify slavery as part of the order of existence, though he makes a distinction between what he calls slaves by nature, those born in captivity, and slaves by law, those captured in war. Aristotle proposed this distinction in response to those who regarded the very existence of slavery as "contrary to nature" (1253b1255b).
Our understanding of slavery in the Greek world is bedevilled by both modern Christianity and Marxism. Each imposes value judgements upon the institution, and these value judgements tend to distort our investigation of its place in ancient society. Christianity deplores slavery as barbaric and inhumane. Marxist historians identify slaves with the subjected European proletariat of the nineteenth century. Friedrich Engels even went so far as to allege that the moral and political collapse of the ancient world was chiefly caused by slavery. Neither the Christian nor the Marxist viewpoint does full justice to the realities of life in the ancient world, however. Abhorrent though the institution of slavery was in many respects, it nonetheless provided some measure of economic security. Thus when Achilles wishes to convey the worst social condition imaginable, he instances that of a man who works as a day laborer, rather than that of a slave (Odyssey 11.489f.). With the exception of Spartan agriculture and Athenian silver mining, there is little evidence to suggest that the Greeks depended on slavery for what Marxists call their means of production. Overall, therefore, it remains questionable whether the achievements of Greek civilization were made possible by slavery.
FOREIGNERS AND BARBARIANS

The status of being a foreigner, as the Greeks understood the term does not permit any easy definition. Primarily it signified such peoples as the Persians and Egyptians, whose languages were unintelligible to the Greeks, but it could also be used of Greeks who spoke in a different dialect and with a different accent. Notable among this latter category were the Macedonians, whom many Greeks regarded as semibarbaric, as the following judgement upon Philip 11 of Macedon by the Athenian politician Demosthenes indicates:

He's so far from being a Greek or having the remotest connection with us Greeks that he doesn't even come from a country with a name that's respected. He's a rotten Macedonian and it wasn't long ago that you couldn't even buy a decent slave from Macedon. (Third Philippic 31)

Prejudice toward Greeks on the part of Greeks was not limited to those who lived on the fringes of the Greek world. The Boeotians, inhabitants of central Greece, whose credentials were impeccable, were routinely mocked for their stupidity and gluttony. Ethnicity is a fluid concept even at the best of times. When it suited their purposes, the Greeks also divided themselves into Ionians and Dorians. The distinction was emphasized at the time of the Peloponnesian War, when the Ionian Athenians fought against the Dorian Spartans. The Spartan general Brasidas even taxed the Athenians with cowardice on account of their Ionian lineage. In other periods of history the Ionian-Dorian divide carried much less weight.

Metics
"Metic," which comes from the Greek word metoikos meaning Metics "one who dwells among," denoted a foreigner with the right to live permanently in the host country of his or her choice. Classical Athens, because of her empire, wealth, and commercial importance, attracted a vast number of metics. In this she was rather unusual, as Perikles pointed out (Thukydides 2.39.1). Approximately three-fifths of the metic population lived in demes located in or around Athens, nearly one-fifth in the port of Piraeus, and the remaining fifth in dernes situated in the countryside and along the coast. At least sixty different Greek and non-Greek states are represented among their ranks, as we know from sepulchral inscriptions. In the fifth century B.c., metics perhaps accounted for as much as 10 percent of Athens' entire population, or about from 20,000 to 30,000. It should be emphasized, however, that their numbers fluctuated in line with Athens' changing fortunes and prosperity. Very likely many left before the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War in 431 i3.c. Athens was not the only Greek state that encouraged the immigration of foreigners, but it was undoubtedly the one that attracted them in greatest numbers. The Spartans were notoriously xenophobic and actively discouraged foreigners from residing in their territory even on a short-term basis.

It was due to the large influx of metics around the middle of the fifth century i3.c. that Athens introduced a law debarring the offspring of a union between an Athenian citizen and a metic woman from claiming citizenship. The state also revised her citizen register at this time and struck off a number of suspected metics who were believed to be claiming citizenship under false pretenses. Though Athenians could marry metic women, metic men were subject to a fine of 1,000 drachmas-the equivalent of about three years' salary-for cohabiting with an Athenian woman. Each metic had to have an Athenian sponsor, called a prostatês ,and be registered in a deme. He or she was required to pay an annual poll tax called a metoikion. Men were liable to service in the military but in the navy only in times of emergency. They were also required to undertake liturgies. Metics were not permitted to own land unless they had obtained a special grant called an enktêsis. This entitled them either to purchase a home or establish a sanctuary for the worship of a foreign deity.

It was through their private cultic associations that metics were able to consort together and retain their distinctive identity. Many such associations also functioned as dining clubs. One of these was devoted to the worship of the Phrygian god Sabazios, an exotic deity whose nocturnal rites included ecstatic dances accompanied by the flute and kettledrum. The cult of Sabazios aroused such animosity when it was first introduced into Athens that it was the butt of humor in no fewer than four comedies by Aristophanes. In one play, Sabazios, together with other foreign deities, is booted out of Athens. In the middle of the fourth century B.C., however, the Athenians received an oracle ordering them to desist from persecuting the followers of Sabazios. This had the desired effect, and in time the Athenians themselves became worshipers of Sabazios. An inscription dated to the very end of the second century B.C. records the names of fifty-one members of the cult, no fewer than thirtysix of whom were Athenian.

Religion apart, to what extent were the Athenians tolerant of foreign influences, let alone in the business of absorbing them? We know that some Athenians affected the Spartan style of dress by wearing short cloaks and growing their hair long. In addition, the Athenians' fascination with the sophists, who were teachers of rhetoric, is often quoted as an instance of their appetite for foreign ideas. As the sophists and Spartans were Greek, however, they hardly count as foreign.

Barbarian
It is sometimes suggested that the Greeks more or less invented racism single-handedly by holding up their culture Barbarians as a shining example of everything that was noble and praiseworthy, while at the same time rubbishing everybody else, particularly the Persians. The truth, however, is rather more complex. Even if the Greeks considered their culture to be superior to others, that does not mean that they were out-and-out racists. Moreover, some Greeks saw much to admire in Persian culture. The historian Herodotos was so enamored of the Persians that he was dubbed philobarbaros, or "barbarian lover." Overall, the Greek attitude toward the Persians was probably a complex mixture of fascination, envy, and contempt. The notion of the barbarian was not inherent in Greek culture. There is no trace of racial prejudice against the Trojans in Homer's Iliad. In fact, the regard for civilized values on the part of the Trojans is equal, if not superior, to that of the Greeks. The word barbaroph6noi, meaning "of barbarous diction," appears only once in the Iliad, in reference to a contingent of Karians, a semi-barbarous people who fought on the side of the Greeks. Not until Aeschylus' Persians, which was produced in 472 B.c., are barbarians depicted as a stereotypical group with a homogeneous culture. This change came about as a result of the Persian invasion of Greece-an event that bred terror and loathing in the Greek population, similar in intensity to that felt toward the hated Hun by the Allies in World War I. The stereotype was also disseminated through art, notably in portrayals of the battle between the Lapiths and Centaurs, which we find on the metopes of the Parthenon. The lascivious and aggressive Centaurs stand for the Persians and the innocent and abused Lapiths for the Greeks. Depictions of this mythological encounter, in which right clearly triumphed over wrong, served to bolster Greek self-esteem and self-righteousness in the aftermath of the Persian invasion.

Precisely what the category barbarian amounted to in practical terms is difficult to determine. The most plausible origin of the word is "the people who mutter ba-ba-ba." Barbarians, in other words, were people who could not speak Greek. Non-Greek speakers were excluded from participation in the Olympic Games and from certain other religious ceremonies, such as the Eleusinian Mysteries. In time, however, barbarian also came to acquire the pejorative meaning of "ignorant, brutal, and savage."

"Typical" barbarian behavior included drinking neat wine, beer, and milk; wearing effeminate clothing; and practicing circumcision. Thukydides (1.6.1-3) was of the belief that contemporary barbarians behaved similarly to the earliest inhabitants of Greece, in that they carried weapons around with them and wore loincloths when exercising. The most despised feature of barbarian society, however, was the subjugation of its population to one man, as the following brief exchange from Aeschylus' Persians indicates. It takes place at the royal capital of Susa shortly after the Persian queen received news of her son's defeat at the battle of Salamis.

Queen: Who is their leader? Who commands their army?
Chorus: They declare themselves to be the slaves of no-one and to serve no-one.
Queen: How then can they withstand an enemy invasion?
Chorus: Well enough to destroy King Dareios' large and powerful army. (lines 241-44)

Despite the highly negative view of barbarian culture that many Greeks held, there is no evidence to suggest that barbarians were unwelcome or subjected to mistreatment if they traveled to Greece. On the contrary, they figure prominently among Athens' metic population in the fourth century. The Sidonians, who were Phoenicians, actually enjoyed a privileged status that was not extended to other metics: they were exempted from the metic tax and other financial burdens.

Ultimate Monstrosity
The outermost reaches of geographical knowledge were thought to be inhabited by monstrous races, descriptions of whom were brought back by travelers. They include the Astomoi or Mouthless Ones, who have holes in their faces instead of mouths; the Skiapods or Shadowfeet, a one-legged people who lie on their backs shading their heads from the sun with a single huge foot; and the Kynokephaloi or Dogheads, who communicate by barking.

No figure quite so succinctly epitomizes the horror of the foreign, however, as the Cyclops Polyphemos, whom Odysseus encounters in Book 9 of the Odyssey. Solitary, monstrous in size, possessing a single eye in the center of his forehead, stupid, contemptuous toward the gods, hostile toward strangers, . -rnorant of seafaring and agriculture, Polyphemos is everything that the Greeks despised. Who could fail to be repulsed by the description of the regurgitated pieces of human flesh that surface at the comers of his giant maw, as he sleeps off a dinner that consisted of Odysseus' companions? And who could fail to applaud when Odysseus blinds his single eye with a stake, before escaping from the cave by grabbing onto the belly of Polyphemos' favorite ram?

This interpretation nonetheless ignores one or two important details that are less than complimentary to the hero. In the first place, the encounter with the Cyclops could have been avoided altogether if Odysseus had listened to his companions, instead of being guided by his own insatiable curiosity. It was his curiosity that prompted him to wait for the Cyclops in his cave, and this in turn led to the deaths of several of his companions. Again, after he escaped, it was his irrepressible ego that caused him to reveal his name to the Cyclops, enabling the Cyclops to curse him in the name of his father Poseidon and delay Odysseus'homecoming by many years. In short, the encounter leaves us with the distinct Impression that a canny Greek is by no means intellectually light-years ahead of an ignorant and uneducated Cyclops. Already in Homer's day, the category "barbarian" was problematic.

THE SPARTAN ALTERNATIVE

Spartan society was unique in that the needs of the family were wholly subordinated to the requirements of the state. It was a militaristic society, whose primary objective from the seventh century B.C, onward was to foster a high degree of conformity and discipline. It therefore differed radically from Athenian society, to which it is unflatteringly contrasted in Perikles' Funeral Speech (Thukydides 2.37-39). Perikles' view notwithstanding, there were a good many Greeks who admired the Spartan system. Xenophon (Constitution of the Spartans 10.4), for instance, an Athenian who was born a generation later than Perikles, has this to say about it: "The state of Sparta with good reason outshines all other states in virtue, since she alone has made the attainment of a high standard of nobility a public duty" (line 10.4).

It would be extremely difficult to write a detailed account of Spartan daily life, since its people have left behind so few traces of themselves. Most of what we know about their society comes from philosophers and historians, and they were hardly concerned with the practicalities of daily life. What is beyond dispute, however, is that Sparta was extremely conservative, as we know from the fact that its constitution remained unchanged for hundreds of years. Virtually from birth onward, the obligation to the state overrode any duty to self or family. Appropriately, therefore, the only two types of Spartans who were accorded the distinction of being honored with tombstones that recorded their names were soldiers who died in battle and women who died in labor.

Upbringing
The Spartan home was hardly a home in our sense of the Upbringing word, since children spent most of their time with their peers. Even the first years of a boy's life were not completely free of discipline, as Plutarch informs us: "Spartan nurses taught Spartan babies to avoid any fussiness in their diet, not to be afraid of the dark, not to cry or scream, and not to throw any other kind of tantrum" (Life of Lykourgos 16.3).

From the age of six onward boys were removed from the care of their parents and subjected to a tough system of state education known as the agôgê, or training. The aim of the agôgê, which had something of the character of a Victorian boarding school, was to instill obedience, discipline, and resourcefulness. It probably had the further consequence of turning the child first into a brat, then into a bully. Boys were divided into packs and placed under the general control of an educational director known as a paidonomos. The boys were whipped for minor offenses and never given enough food in order to encourage them to thieve. Plutarch describes the process as follows:

Learning how to read and write was not considered important. Mainly their education consisted in learning how to carry out orders, how to test themselves to the limits of their endurance, and how to succeed at wrestling. So their training got tougher and tougher as they got older. Their heads were close-shaved, and they learnt how to march barefoot and go naked when training. (Life of Lykourgos 16.6)

The courage that this kind of training was designed to produce is indicated by the well-known story of a boy who was apprehended with a stolen fox under his cloak. Rather than admit his crime to his captors and undergo the humiliation of punishment, the boy vehemently denied the charge. His courage cost him his life because the fox gnawed through his entrails while he was being interrogated. Although physically weak babies were exposed at birth there must have been a number of perfectly fit and healthy children who were bullied mercilessly and who found this brutal system quite intolerable.

When a youth reached the age of sixteen (or possibly eighteen), he became a member of the krypteia. This, as its name from the Greek verb krypt, meaning "conceal," indicates, was a kind of secret police force. Its purpose was to intimidate the subjected helot population. During this period he lived out in the wilds and had to fend for himself.

Citizenship
At the age of twenty a youth's education came to an end and he graduated to the eirênes, a word of uncertain etymology. He was now liable for military service, though he did not yet possess full rights of citizenship. Even now, however, he was still required to lead a communal life, eating with his peers and sleeping in army barracks. Only occasionally would he be allowed to sleep with his wife. Even on his wedding night a Spartan bridegroom was permitted to spend only a short time with his bride; he was required to return to his army barracks before dawn.

On reaching thirty a Spartan finally became a full citizen, or homoios, which means "Peer." He now enjoyed something resembling a home life, though he was still required to take a number of his meals away from home. Qualification for Spartan citizenship, in fact, depended on membership in a syssition, or dining club. Each syssitos, or member of a syssition, made a monthly contribution to his dining club. He would not only regularly dine and relax in the company of his fellow syssitoi, but also fight alongside them in time of war. The size of a syssition is not known. Plutarch (Life of Lykourgos 12) suggests that the number was as low as fifteen, but modem estimates put it much higher, perhaps as high as three hundred. Only when he attained sixty was a Spartan finally released from military obligations, though, like many other retired servicemen, he probably continued to feel as much at home in the army as he did at home.

Women
Although Spartan home life was extremely restricted, women actually enjoyed more freedom than their counterparts in many other parts of the Greek world. Girls were allowed to mix freely with boys. They also underwent an intensive physical training program, which included discus and javelin throwing, and wrestling. The purpose of this training program was to ensure that they became fit breeders of Spartan babies. The extreme value that was put on child rearing in Spartan society is indicated by the fact that wives could be "loaned" to an interested third party with the agreement of the husband, presumably in order to exploit their fecundity in cases where the husband was elderly or infertile. Another unique feature of Spartan society is that women were permitted to own their own property.

Spartan Helots
When the Spartans conquered Lakonia and Messenia, they re duced the entire population to servile status. Known as heilôtai, Helots or helots, a word that is probably connected with a verb meaning "to capture," Spartan slaves were required to till the land and pay half their produce to their masters, who were thus freed to discharge their military duties. We have no means of estimating the size of the helot population, but it almost certainly outnumbered that of the citizen body. Such was the animosity felt toward the helots that the Spartan ephors annually declared war on them. Helots had no political or legal rights and could be executed without trial. They could be freed only by a decision of the Spartan assembly. Their condition was so wretched that the poet Tyrtaios describes them as "asses worn down with great burdens." They were the property of the state and assigned by it to individual citizens, who did not have the right to dispose of them. Since, perhaps uniquely among slave populations, they were allowed to propagate without restriction, helots were racially homogeneous. For this reason the Spartans were constantly fearful of helot revolts and took extreme measures to safeguard against them, as this chilling incident reported by Thukydides indicates.

On one occasion [in 424 B.C.] the Spartans issued a proclamation to their helots offering freedom to those who judged themselves to have shown the most bravery in war. Their purpose was to make test of them, since they believed that those who came forward first to claim their freedom would also be the ones who were most likely to give them trouble. Two thousand were selected. They were crowned and did the rounds of the temples, thinking that they had been liberated. Not long afterwards, however, the Spartans eliminated them. To this day nobody knows exactly how any of them perished. (4.80.3-5)

The Economy
The majority of Spartans seem to have been content to lead lives of the utmost frugality and simplicity. They had virtually no means of acquiring wealth, since the Spartan economy was wholly agrarian. Though we do not know whether every citizen possessed a klêros or holding assigned to him by the state at birth, most of the population were no doubt at the same point in the economic scale. When abroad and off the leash, however, Spartan generals were as greedy as the rest. A common, though no doubt occasionally trumped up, charge leveled against them was that of accepting bribes from the enemy.

Conclusions


Sparta was not the only polis that put a premium on military discipline, but it was the one that did so to an extreme degree. Since the lives of all its members were dominated by warfare, there can have been little time for relaxation and pleasure. How the Spartans occupied themselves when they were not either exercising or fighting remains a mystery. Perhaps they were simply too exhausted to bother. From the sixth century B.C. onward, they had little interest in cultivating the arts. Clearly the pursuit of happiness was not a recognized Spartan ideal. The austerity of their lifestyle gives us our word "Spartan." Hardly surprisingly, the Spartans also had a reputation for extreme economy in the use of language, and the term "laconic" derives from the Spartan aversion to long speeches. In the hands of the Spartans, however, brevity could be put to good effect. When Philip II of Macedon sent the Spartans a letter threatening to raze Sparta if he captured the city, the ephors are said to have sent him back just one word in reply: "if".



The consequences of Greek forms of racism

If one is looking for racism in antiquity, one has to define the terms with some care. The Greeks didn’t invent but extend the notion of racism. The essence of Greek discrimination is that it regards Greeks as superior which might without contradiction encompass positive feelings about a Hellenic group to which common admirable characteristics might be attributed and considered unalterable by reason of hereditary or other determinism.

In the Greek definition barbaroi, one misses what might have been thought an essential element in racism, namely, the irrational and usually violent hostility directed at individuals or groups, who typically become victims of the dominant group in ways that go well beyond the realm of attitude.

But Greek subliminal racism does not appeal to skin color as a determining factor, but its definition passes over the sort of oppression, racially based or not it presents Greek views on the impact of the environment on peoples, inheritance of acquired characteristics, and purity of descent and autochthony, with sections on modern eugenics.

Tracing a divine ancestry Greek mythology was racist from the outset. Those who have not made a systematic search for these themes in classical texts will almost surely be surprised at their pervasiveness and at the ease with which some of the best Greek minds in antiquity were seduced into such stereotypical thinking.

One must take seriously the Athenian claim to be autochthonous not as historical truth, but as a significant element in Athenian self-understanding and self-projection. Athenian and Spartan societies were the first form of government based on organized racism.

Many statements made in antiquity by Aristotle, Thucydides, Plato, lesser figures like Strabo and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and various Roman authors from Cicero to Tacitus, explicitly assert that because barbaroi were naturally inferior, they were suitable to be conquered and enslaved.

This has been a subject ignored and less attractive to later European cultures, relishing on Greek antiquity perhaps in part because, in the ancient view, the ancestors of most of the populations of Europe were themselves counted among the barbaroi who deserved to be slaves.



Brutes and Animals

Greeks held the assertion that some foreign peoples are bestial, savage, and even cannibalistic by nature - absolute markers not merely of inferiority but of utter depravity, meriting not subjugation but annihilation.

Therefore Greek unsettling juxtaposition of quotes and their drive of Helot (native inhabitants of Sparta) extermination do not differ in essence from the worst deeds of holocaust or Serb ethnic cleansing.

The most poisonous modern instances (e.g. Americans vs. African-Americans and Indians, Nazis vs. Jews and Slavs, Slavs vs. Albanians) have involved accusations which were never leveled to the Greeks who practiced mass murder in antiquity.

All those fears and suppression and the kinds of interactions that took place between Greco-Roman culture played a powerful role in later forms of racism in Europe.

Greek notorious ideas and pandemic of racism reached finally Rome. From the beginning the Roman Empire was a conglomerate of people hardly related by common language or divine ancestry. After the appreciation of Greek supremacy several curious permutations could be surveyed in Rome of the idea that foreigners were degraded beings who deserved to be conquered and enslaved. The first is that if sufficient numbers of these non-Roman outsiders are brought to the city, even as slaves, they will corrupt Roman culture with their (eastern) luxuries and immoral barbarian ways: Vincendo victi sumus (Plin. N.H. 24.5.5, referring to Greek medicine), itself an apparent allusion to Horace’s famous Graecia capta line (Epist. 2.1.156).

Athenian painful racism has actually been repeatedly copied and perfected by European cultures. Athenian criteria of citizenship doesn't differ from the American standards of naturalization process.

The Greek paranoia regarding the native pre-Greek population in Sparta draws similar conclusions about the threat posed to traditional American culture by unchecked development of native Indians. Greek xenophobia is not different from the American laws to prevent immigration from non-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant parts of the planet. In both cases, highly selective and subjective choices regarding evidence merely confirm the xenophobic prejudices that underlie such statements.

A second permutation reverses the first: if the newly-conquered peoples are not from effete eastern regions but the battle-hardened northern and western parts of Europe, then the introduction of the luxuries and comforts of civilized society will cause their tough character to soften - and perhaps even make otherwise recalcitrant and rebellious tribes more willing to tolerate the Roman yoke.

Greek prejudice stemmed from their total ignorance with regard to other European neighbors. There was in antiquity no unitary, diachronically-stable entity called e.g. Galli or Germani, only the dozens or hundreds of tribes lumped together by those generic terms. In all too many instances, Greeks lacked sufficient information about the self-definition of these groups (especially in their own languages) and the degree to which they would have accepted such blanket expressions, which by mere use create an affiliation that may oversimplify or misrepresent what they perceived as reality. Greeks failed to find out that the qualities universally ascribed to a generic entity like the Germans were not in fact shared equally or at all by some of the tribes routinely placed within that category.

Greek paranoia was translated as Roman attitudes toward the Jews. Typically, much stronger feelings of xenophobia are aroused when an established population comes to realize that a sizable group of aliens has come into their midst, bringing all their potentially threatening foreign ideas and customs. This matters because, unlike e.g. the Parthians and the Germans, who were rarely encountered in and around Rome itself, there seems to have been a noticeable Jewish community in the city from the late Republic through the Empire and, as happens all too often, increased familiarity with the practices of a different culture did not lead to unanimous approval.

Greek ideas pressured Romans to concentrate on the details of this complicated and frequently adversarial relationship with the Jews. Romans were appalled from the ritual of circumcision. Accusations of human sacrifice and cannibalism increased Roman antipathy toward Jewish culture which made them focused on their alleged antisocial separateness and certain peculiarities in their religion. Yet Roman antipathy to the Jews, in spite of its often forceful expression, is not racist compared to the extermination policy of Sparta against native Helots.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801170053 ... acism.html

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:38 pm
by ALBPelasgian
guide

Home

Guide to IED

This Dictionary carries the etymology of the Albanian language to its logical and natural conclusion, for if the documentary history of words is of interest and value, so is their reconstructed prehistory. The historical component is given in the etymologies, after the definitions in the main body of the Dictionary. This dictionary supplies the prehistoric component, tracing the ultimate Indo-European derivations of those Albanian words that are descended from a selected group of Indo-European roots.

In the dictionary, the form given in boldface type at the head of each entry is, unless otherwise identified, an Indo-European root in its basic form. The basic root form is followed in some cases by one or more variants, also in boldface type. Then the basic reconstructed meaning or meanings of the root are given. Meanings that are different parts of speech are separated by a semicolon.

After the basic meaning there may appear further information about the phonological shape or nature of the root:

skei- To cut, split. Extension of sek-.

Most, but not all, of the additional information is self-explanatory.
The text of each entry describes in detail the development of Modern Albanian words from the root. Each numbered section of an entry begins with a list, in SMALL CAPITALS, of the Modern Albanian words derived from a particular form of the root. (This list may be preceded by an intermediate step; see further below.) The simple (uncompounded) derivatives are given first; the compounds follow, separated from them by a semicolon. In some cases no further semantic or morphological development needs to be explained, and the lemma, the historically attested representative of the root, is given next, as avis at the entry awi-:

Much more commonly, however, intermediate developments require explanation. These intermediate stages are reconstructions representing a word stem in Indo-European that is necessary to explain the lemma following it. The reconstructed forms are not historically attested; they are preceded by an asterisk (*) to note this fact. Sometimes earlier or later developments of the intermediate forms are given in parentheses. In these cases the symbol < is used to mean “derived from” and the symbol > is used to mean “developed into.” Intermediate stages that are in fact attested are usually given in the etymology of the word in the main vocabulary of the Dictionary. The following terms are used to describe typical morphological processes of Indo-European:

Full-grade form: A form with e-vocalism (the basic form); so identified for descriptive contrast.

O-grade form: A form with o-vocalism:
Zero-grade form: A form with zero-vocalism:
Lengthened-grade form: A form with lengthened vocalism:

Secondary full-grade form: A new full-grade form created by inserting the fundamental vowel e in the zero-grade form of an extended root:

Basic form: The unchanged root; so identified for descriptive contrast.
Suffixed form: A form with one or more suffixes, written with an internal hyphen:
Prefixed form: A form with a prefix, written with an internal hyphen:
Extended form: A form with an extension or enlargement, written without internal hyphens:
Nasalized form: A form with a nasal infix, written with internal hyphens:

Reduplicated form: A form prefixed by its own initial consonant followed by a vowel:

Expressive form: A form with “expressive gemination” (doubling of the final consonant), written without internal hyphens:

Compound form: A form compounded with a form of another root, written with internal hyphens:

Shortened form: A form with shortened vocalism:

Reduced form: A form with loss of one or more sounds:

Oldest root form: A root form showing a laryngeal in a position, typically at the beginning or end of a root, where it is preserved in only a few Indo-European languages, such as Greek or Hittite:

Variant form: A form altered in any way other than those described in the above categories:

These terms can be combined freely to describe in as much detail as necessary the development from the root to the lemma.

In order to emphasize the fact that Albanian belongs to the Illyrian branch of Indo-European and give precedence to directly inherited words in contrast to words borrowed from other branches, the intermediate stages in Illyrian etymologies are covered in fuller detail. The Common or Proto-Illyrian (here called simply Illyrian) forms underlying Albanian words are always given. Where no other considerations intervene, Illyrian is given first of the Indo-European groups, and Old Albanian is given first within Illyrian, although this order of precedence is not rigidly applied.

Symbols:
*unattested
< derived from
> developed into
Parentheses within a form enclose sound(s) or letter(s) sometimes or optionally present.

Grammatical abbreviations used in the IED
Below is given a list of the grammatical abbreviations used.
Part of speech:
noun

noun (implied when no part of speech is supplied; also used for languages which do not have gender, e.g. Armenian)

PN
name of a person

GN
name of a god(dess)

PlN
placename

TN
name of a tribe

RN
name of a river (or any water)

MN
name of a mountain
adj
adjective
comp
comparative
sup
superlative
adv
adverb
art
article
num
cardinal number
ord
ordinal number
pron
pronoun (not further defined)
pronpers
personal pronoun
prondem
demonstrative pronoun
pronindef
indefinite pronoun
pronrel
relative pronoun
verb
verb
part
particle (indeclinable)
enclpart
enclitic particle (indeclinable)
conj
conjunction
interj
interjection
neg
negation
prep
preposition
postp
postposition
prevb
preverb
pref
prefix
suff
suffix
1mc
the first member of a compound

2mc
the second member of a compound

Case:
Nom

nominative

Acc
accusative

Voc
vocative

Gen
genitive

Dat
dative

Abl
ablative

Ins
instrumental

Loc
locative

Obl
oblique case (e.g. in Tocharian)

Gender:
m
masculine
f
feminine
n
neuter
c
commune (e.g. in Hittite)
Number:
s
singular
d
dual
p
plural
Person:
1

first person

2
second person

3
third person

Tense:
Pres

present

Impf
imperfect

Aor
aorist

Pt
preterite

Pf
perfect

Fut
future

Mood/Formation:
Ind

indicative

Subj
subjunctive

Opt
optative

Impv
imperative

Inj
injunctive

Inf
infinitive

Ptc
participle

Voice:
Act

active

Med
middle

Pass
passive

Refl
reflexive

Various:
C
consonant stem
irreg
irregular
indecl
indeclinable
Denom
denominative


List of language abbreviations in the IED
Abbreviation Language name
Aeol. Aeolic
Aeq. Aequian
Akk. Akkadian
Alan. Alanian (=Old Ossetic)
Alb. Albanian
AlbG Geg
AlbT Tosc
Alem. Alemannian
Anat. Anatolian
Ang. Anglian
AngN Anglo-Norman
Aram.-Iran Aramaeo-Iranian
Arc. Arcadian
Arm. Armenian (=class.)
Ash. Ashkun
Ass. Assyrian
Att. Attic
Auk. Aukshtaitian
Av. Avestan
Bactr. Bactrian
Bal. Baluchi
Bav. Bavarian
Bel. Belorussian
Bl. Baltic
Boe. Boeotian
Br. British
Bret. Breton
BSl. Balto-Slavic
Bulg. (Modern) Bulgarian
Burg. Burgundian
BVan. Bas-Vannetais
Car. Carian
CCl. Continental Celtic
Chak. Chakavian
Chor. Chorasmian
CIb. Celtiberian
Cl. Celtic
Class. Skt. Classical Sanskrit
Co. Cornish
Corn. Cornouillais
Cret. Cretan
CrGo. Crimean Gothic
Cur. Curonian
Cypr. Cypriot
Cz. Czech
Dac. Dacian
Dan. Danish
Dard. Dardic
Dor. Doric
Dzuk. Dzukian
EBl. East Baltic
EFra. East Franconian
EGm. East Germanic
EGmRun. East-Germanic Runic
El. Elymian
Elam. Elamite
Elam.-Iran. Elamo-Iranian
EMoBret. Early Modern Breton
EMoIr. Early Modern Irish
EMoW Early Modern Welsh
ESl. East Slavic
Etr. Etruscan
Faer. Faeroese
Fal. Faliscan
Fi. Finnish
Fr. French
Fra. Franconian
Fri. Modern Frisian
FriRun. Frisian Runic
Gal. Galindian
Galat. Galatian
Gallo-Gk. Gallo-Gk. (in Gk. authors)
Gallo-Lat. Gallo-Latin (in Lat. authors)
Gaul. Gaulish
GaulG Gaulish in Greek letters
GaulL Gaulish in Lat. letters
GAv. Gatha-Avestan
Gm. Germanic
Go. Gothic
Gr. Greek
Hebr. Hebrew
Hell. Hellenistic
Hi. Hindi
Hitt. Hittite
HLuv. Hieroglyphic Luvian
HVan. Haut-Vannetais
IE Indo-European
IIr. Indo-Iranian
Ill. Illyrian
Ind. Indic
InsCl. Insular Celtic
Ion. Ionian
Ion.-Att. Ionic-Attic
Ir. Irish
Iran. Iranian
It. Italic
It.-Cl. Italo-Celtic
Ital. Italian
Kajk. Kajkavian
Kash. Kashubian
Ken. Kentish
Khot. Khotanese (=Saka)
Kurd. Kurdish
Lak. Lakonian
Lang. Langobardian
Lat. Latin
Latg. Latgalian
Latv. Latvian
LAv. Late Avestan
LCo. Late Cornish
Lep. Lepontic
Lesb. Lesbian
Lig. Ligurian
Lith. Lithuanian
Liv. Livonian
LLat. Late Latin
LPBr. Late Proto-British
LSrb. Lower Sorbian
Lus. Lusitanian
Luv. (Cuneiform) Luvian
Lyc. Lycian
LycA Lycian A
LycB Lycian B
Lyd. Lydian
Mac. Macedonian
MArm. Middle Armenian
Marr. Marrucinian
Mars. Marsian
Maz. Mazanderani
Mbret. Middle Breton
MBulg. Middle Bulgarian
Mcd. Macedonian
MCo. Middle Cornish
MDu. Middle Dutch
ME Middle English
Med. Median
Merc. Mercian
Mess. Messapic
MFr. Middle French
MFra. Middle Franconian
MHG Middle High German
MIA Middle Indo-Aryan
MIA Middle Indo-Aryan
MIc. Middle Icelandic
MIr. Middle Irish
with. Mitanni
MLat. Medieval Latin
MLG Middle Low German
MnLE Restsprachen east
MnLW Restsprachen west
MoArm. Modern Armenian
MoBret. Modern Bret.
MoCo. Modern Cornish
MoDu. Modern Dutch
MoE Modern English
MoHG Modern High German
MoIA Modern Indo-Aryan
MoIc. Modern Icelandic
MoIr. Modern Irish
MoLG Modern Low German
MoP Modern Persian
MoW Modern Welsh
MP Middle Persian
Mun. Munji
MW Middle Welsh
Myc. Mycenaean
NEIran. Northeast Iranian
NGm. North Germanic
NIA New Indo-Aryan
non-IE Non-IE languages
NPhr. New Phrygian
Nth. Northumbrian
Nur. Nuristani
Nw. Norwegian
NWGk. Northwestern Greek
NWIran. Northwest Iranian
OBr. Old British (i.e. names in Latin sources and inscriptions of the Dark Ages)
OBret. Old Breton
OCo. Old Cornish (Voc. Corn.)
OCS Old Church Slavonic
ODan. Old Danish
OE Old English
OERun. Old English Runic
OFr. Old French
OFri. Old Frisian
OFriRun. Old Frisian Runic
Og. Ogam Irish
OGm. Old Germanic (i.e. personal and placenames in Classical sources)
OGt. Old Gutnish
OHG Old High German
OIA Old Indo-Aryan
OIc. Old Icelandic
OIr. Old Irish
OIran. Old Iranian (names in var. sources)
OLat. Old Latin
OLFra. Old Low Franconian
OLith. Old Lithuanian
ON Old Norse
ONRun. Old Norse Runic
ONw. Old Norwegian
OP Old Persian
OPhr. Old Phrygian
OPr. Old Prussian
Orm. Ormuri
ORu. Old Russian
ORun. Old Runic
OS Old Saxon
Osc. Oscan
Oss. Ossetic
OssD Digor
OssI Iron
OSw. Old Swedish
OSWBr. Old South-West British
OW Old Welsh
P Proto- (can be prefixed to any language)
Pa. Pali
Pael. Paelignian
Paeon. Paeonic
Pahl. Pahlavi
Pal. Palaic
Pam. Pamir
Pann. Pannonian
Par. Parachi
Parth. Parthian
Pash. Pashto (=Afghan)
PFU Proto-Fenno-Ugric
Phr. Phrygian
Pis. Pisidic
Pkt. Prakrit
Plb. Polabian
Pol. Polish
PrIr. Primitive Irish
PRom. Proto-Romance
PSab. (Proto-)Sabellian ( = Osco-Umbrian)
PSamn. Presamnitic
PU Proto-Uralic
qIE quasi-Indo-European
RFra. Rhine Franconian
Rosh. Roshani
Ru. Russian
RuCS Russian Church Slavonic
Rum. Rumanian
Sar. Sarikoli
Sarmat. Sarmatian
Sbn. Sabinian
ScG Scots Gaelic
SCr. Serbo-Croatian
SCS Serbian Church Slavonic
Scyth. Scythian
SEIran. Southeast Iranian
Sel. Selian
Sh. Shughni
Shtok. Shtokavian
Sic. Siculian
Sid. Sidetic
Skt. Sanskrit
Sl. Slavic
Slc. Slovincian
Slk. Slovak
Sln. Slovene
Sogd. Sogdian
Sorb. Sorbian
Sp. Spanish
SPic. South Picenian
SSl. South Slavic
Sum. Sumerian (non-IE)
Sw. Swedish
SwG Swiss German (Schweizerdeutsch)
SWIran. Southwest Iranian
Taj. Tajik
Thes. Thessalian
Thrac. Thracian
To. Tocharian
ToA Tocharian A
ToB Tocharian B
Treg. Tregorrois
Ukr. Ukrainian
Umb. Umbrian
USrb. Upper Sorbian
Van. Vannetais
Vand. Vandal
Ved. Vedic
Ven. Venetic
Vest. Vestinian
Vol. Volscan
W Welsh
Wa. Wakhi
WBl. West Baltic
WFra. West Franconian
WGm. West Germanic
WS West-Saxon
WSl. West Slavic
Yagh. Yaghnobi
Yaz. Yazgulami
Yi. Yidgha
Zhem. Zhemaitian

http://web.archive.org/web/200801130437 ... guide.html

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:40 pm
by ALBPelasgian
CAUCASIAN ALBANIANS VERSUS ILLYRIAN ALBANIANS

Caucasian Albanians must not to be confused with the Illyrian Albanians of modern-day Albania in the Balkans.

AVAR ETYMOLOGY

Avar
Any member of a people of undetermined origin who built an empire in eastern Europe between the Adriatic and Baltic seas and the Elbe and Dnieper rivers in the 6th–9th centuries.
Mounted nomads, possibly from Central Asia, they made the Hungarian plain the centre of their empire, from which they intervened in Germanic tribal wars, helped the Lombards overthrow allies of Byzantium, and nearly succeeded in occupying Constantinople in 626. They also fought the Merovingians and helped push the Serbs and Croats southward towards Illyrian territories. Avar decline began in the late 7th century and culminated in the destruction of their capital by Charlemagne in 796. In the early 9th century the Avars were fully incorporated in the Carolingian empire.

Caucasian Albanians must not to be confused with the Illyrian Albanians of modern-day Albania in the Balkans. The Caucasian Albanian name could be the remnant of the Macedonian expansion towards Asia. Alexander the Great had recruited Illyrian soldiers for his campaign against Persia and later India.
Alexander the Great:

THE HINDU KUSH

In the Spring of 329, Alexander crossed the Hindu Kush from Gandara to Bactria in order to pursue the Persian leader Bessus. The best description is that of the Roman author Quintus Curtius Rufus, who based his account on earlier, Greek sources. Section 7.4.20-25 of his History of Alexander the Great of Macedonia was translated by John Yardley.


THE HINDU KUSH

Bessus had an army of 8,000 Bactrians who faithfully carried out his orders as long as they thought their intemperate climate would make the Macedonians head for India but, when it was discovered that Alexander was approaching, they all slipped off to their villages and abandoned him. With a group of dependants who had not changed their allegiance, he crossed the river Oxus, burned the boats used for crossing to stop the enemy using them, and started levying fresh troops among the Sogdians.

Alexander had already crossed the Caucasus, but grain shortages had brought the troops to the verge of starvation. The men rubbed their bodies with juice from pressed sesame in lieu of oil, though the cost of this juice was 240 drachmas per jar, and honey and wine respectively cost 390 and 300 drachmas. As for wheat, there was none, or very little, to be found. (Their crops were hidden by the barbarians in what they called siri, so cunningly concealed that only the men who dug them could find them.) Lacking such provisions, the men survived on fresh-water fish and herbs and, when even those means of sustenance had run out, they were given orders to slaughter the pack-animals. They managed to stay alive on the meat from these until they reached the Bactrians.

Note:
Caucasus is the Greek name for the Hindu Kush and Himalayas.

Consequently Albanian Illyrian toponyms reveal the identify of Illyrian mercenaries in Macedonian army. The lack of Caucasian Albanian root words in Albanian Illyrian language proves the impossible kinship between ancient Avars and modern Albanians.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801130113 ... /serb.html

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:41 pm
by ALBPelasgian
ORIGINS OF SABAR AND AVAR

THE FOREFATHERS OF SRB (SERBIAN) AND HRVAT (CROAT) PEOPLE



Classical Sources

In the mid 5th C., Priskos Rhetor was the first to deal with the Avar tribe which existed in the West Siberian region. This supports the theory of origin from the Balkhash region which is further supported by the Chinese records concerning the related Hua tribes. According to Priscos's account, the Avar-Huns forced the Sabirs out of this land and over the Volga around 461-463CE because "a fog rose from the sea scaring people" and this was followed by countless "vultures descending upon the people". Then in 550, Zakharias Rhetor the church historian mentioned an "Avar" community in the west. Also in the mid 6th century, Menandros wrote about Avars. At the same time Procopius made a distinction in his History of the Wars, Books I and II, between White Huns and European Huns which Simokattes in the early half of the 7thC. defines as the real- and pseudo- avars respectively.
Based upon Simokattes's and other information, the Avars who entered Europe are thought to have been a combination of a (Uighur people called Hund(?) and (because of the anthropological evidence as well as etymology on Avar Khagaan names like Bayan meaning "prosperous" in Mongol but meaning female in most western Altaic tongues) a Mongolian people called Var(?) who united around Balk sometime between 410-470CE.


Developments in Central Eurasia

Avars were once equated with the Juan Juan resulting in much confusion as the latter have become frequently referred to as Avars. Though this equation has since proven to be a gross generalisation since the Juan Juan continued to exist after being overthrown by the Asena until 557 while Sarosios was already well established as Khagan of the Avars in Europe by that time. There is, however, evidence that an element of the European Avars may have been, at least for a little while, a small part of the Juan Juan confederacy.
Besides their generally circulated suggestion of their relationship to the Hephthalites, another well-circulated story of more enigmatic origin has it that the Uygurs were conquered by a Mongolian people in the 5th century (see Uar and Hua). Forming a confederation in present Central Eurasia, they tried to survive in the competition with other Turkic tribes (see Juan Juan), by which they were eventually expelled. The survivors of this group of Turkic/Mongol people migrated toward East Europe where they established the Avars Khaganate 502-530CE, starting an era of conquest.
Developments in Central & S.E. Europe
Allies of the Byzantine Empire, they fought against the Slavs and the Bulgars, controlling the area between the Volga River and the Elbe River as far as the Baltic Sea. However, the situation changed resulting in an attempt to invade Italy in 610 and they attacked Constantinople in 619 and 626. The emperor Heraclius, the Bulgars and some Slavic peoples (Croats (Hrvati) and Serbs Срби Srbi) fought them and pushed them to Illyria and in the 630'sCE Khagan Kubrat of the Onoghur became the first Khagan of the second Avar dynasty.
From the late 7th century, writings begin to mention peoples using a 'K-B/V-R' root ethnonym in the same areas inhabited by Avars. The root K-B/V-R has been explained as "rebel" or "mix" as well as "rotate" and "wander". Dissident Kuber Avar-Huns are mentioned migrating southward following a rebellion against the main body of Avars not long after Batbayan-Bezmer succeeded his father Kubrat as Khagan. It may reasonably be deduced that those western Avars who mixed with the Bulgar-Huns and/or severed ties with/rebelled against the main eastern horde in the Caucasus which was under Khazar rule, became known by the 'K-B/V-R' variation of the name.
Little is known about Kabar/Avars from between the late 7th to late 8th centuries except that most of their neighbours still called them Avars. Excavations of their graves have yielded evidence that they were a Mongolian people who carried objects usually associated with Hebraic culture and it has been suggested that their center of control was actually in Khazaria rather than the Ukraine or Pannonia. As Kabarids (or Kavarites) they also seem to have left their ethnonym in certain towns they founded like for example the Kopyrev Konets district of Kiev in the Ukraine which has been explained from their ethnonym. In 791 they invaded Europe once again. The so-called Avar Ring was defeated by Franks led by Charlemagne in the 9th century whereupon the three major tribes invited the Magyar seven-tribe confederacy to liberate them. The three Avar tribes which Magyar sources call Kavar or Kabar (there is no other mention of Avars in original Magyar sources) were settled in Transylvania. Their Szekely descendants preserved the popular Avar Dragon Totem well into the 15th century.
Caucasian Avars and their Language
A connection between the European Avars and the Caucasian Avars and Kabard is severely questioned, but evidence is mounting in favor of the theory that the Avars who settled in Transylvania were only a "pseudo" (Kabar?) portion of other "true" Avars who remained in the Caucasus region under Khazar control. The faction which is supposed to have remained in the Caucasus formed a powerful khanate in the 10th century contributing to the collapse of Khazaria from within that kingdom.

Anthropological Origins

There are three popular points of origin suggested for the Avar peoples one is in the Caucasus as a branch of the Protoiberians, another is in the Hindu Kush around present day Kabul, and another, associating them with the Parni, is the region beyond the Jaxartes (Transiaxartesia) around Lake Balkhash in north-east Kazakhstan. Perhaps a suitable synthesis of these ideas may be that they were originally inhabitants of Khwarezmia and had thus influence in all three areas. The skeletons found in European Avar graves are mostly mongolian [Istvan Erdelyi's "Kabari (Kavari) v Karpatskom Basseyne" specifically page 179 from Sovietskaya Archeologiya 4 (1983)], but many items usually associated with Hebrews have been found with them [A. Scheiber "Jewish inscriptions in Hungary from the 3rd Century to 1686" (1983); V.L.Vikhnovich "From the Jordan to the Dneiper" from Jewish Studies 31 (1991)]. Whether they had some kind of Hebraic origin connected to the quasi-"Jewish" tribes discovered in China and were a major influence in Khazaria or were simply influenced by the alleged Khazar conversion is a question demanding further investigation. Others have described them as "Amerinoid" (?source) loosely described as 'similar to a Mongolian Type with prominent noses'.


Speculations on Religion

In the east, the inhabitants of Khwarezmia, recognized as being under the Avars by 410CE, were said to observe a form of Mosaic law (see Sabians) which might explain the apparent Hebrew artifacts found in excavations of their Carpathian basin graves. Later while western Avar areas like Avaristan, apparently became a Christian kingdom their former eastern haunts became strongly islamicized. Arguments also exist that Avars were originally Magians, and others suggest a basic form of typical Eurasian Shamanism. These days the only surviving people still known as Avars mostly practice forms of Jafarite islam.
Noahite Origins
The Avars have been included with various Turkic peoples in attempts to trace them a descent from Noah. Joseph ben Gorion's 10thC. historical work "Sefer Yosippon" mentions Avar (עבר) as one of the ten children of the Biblical Togarmah. There is also a suggestion that the Avar-Huns descend from the Biblical Patriarch Eber (also written עבר) via Abraham's third wife Keturah whose descendants had moved to Central Eurasia mentioned in the 12thC. ["Chronicles of Jerahmeel" by Jerahmeel ben Solomon]. There are also references to the descent of various Avar-Hunnic tribes from Magog who also had a descendant called Heber (עבר).
A Common Ethnonym
The obviously quite common eponym may be explained by a widely accepted, theory that the word Avar has a common root with the Turkish word avare, meaning wanderer or vagabond. Thus, it is suggested that terms like "Avar" used for various peoples might derive from a common Turanian etymology with a meaning of human movement like "freeman/ nomad" along with many similar words from many ancient languages like for example Hebrew. For more speculations about Avar peoples in western Central Eurasia before the 5th C. CE see AparDi, Aparytae, Abar-noi, Abaris.


Notes:
Hua is:
• the self designation (endonymic ethnicon) used by the Hephthalites
• the name of a country in China prior to being destroyed by the Chin Emperor Huaguo .
---------------------
The writings of Procopius of Caesarea (500 ? - 565 ?), in Palestine, are the primary source of information for the rule of the emperor Justinian. He was the author of a history in eight books of the wars fought by the Justinian I, a panegyric on Justinian's public works throughout the empire, and a book known as the Secret History that claims to report the scandals Procopius could not include in his published history ("anecdotes").
------------------------
The term Hephthalite derives from Greek, supposedly a rendering of "Hayathelite", the name used by Persian writers to refer to a 6th century empire on the northern and eastern periphery of their land.
In China they were known as 厌哒 or 厭達 (py Yanda) also written Ye-ti-i-li-do/Yeda/Yoptal but are documented as having called themselves Hua or Huer (滑).
----------------------------
Uighurs (also: Uyghurs, Uigurs, Uygurs) (Chinese: Weiwur 維吾爾 or 维吾尔 in pinyin: wéiwúěr) are a Turkic ethnic group of people living in northwestern China (mainly in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, where they are the dominant ethnic group together with Chinese Han people), Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan. The other branch of Uighurs lives in Taoyuan county of Hunan province in Southcentral China. Uighurs form one of the 56 ethnic groups officially recognized by the People's Republic of China.
------------------------------
Juan Juan (wg), Ruanruan (py), Ru Ru (py) or Rouran 柔然 (py) was the name of a confederacy of nomadic tribes on the northern borders of China proper from late 4th century until late 6th century. The term Rouran (柔然) was a Chinese language transcription of the pronunciation of the name the confederacy used to refer to itself.
------------------------------
According to Theophylaktos Simokattes, Uar, along with the Hunnoi, are the names associated with the two biggest tribes of "Procopius's White Huns". They were called Varkhon or Varkunites (Ouarkhonitai) by Menander, perhaps inspired by the name of the God Vulcan, and settled Europe in the Balkans and Pannonia. They are supposed to have united around 460 under the rule of one of the five Yuezhi families - the Hephthal.
--------------------------------
The Byzantine Empire or Eastern Roman Empire was the eastern section of the Roman Empire, with its capital at Constantinople (modern Istanbul), which remained in existence after the fall of Rome in the 5th century. The Byzantine period is usually considered to extend from 395 to 1453.
--------------------------



Sabars and Avars

The name "Serb" is non-Slavic in origin and more likely than not original Serbs were overlords of the Slavs. The name 'Serb' designates not only the population in the invaders of Balkan peninsula but of Lusatia as well. Lusatia, a region in Eastern Germany is inhabited by a nation the Germans call the Wends from which the Greeks derived the word Venedi, alb. vendi 'homeland, country' hence an Illyrian not Slavic name. The name "Serb" is e neologism from the ancient homeland of Serbs, Sarmantia an ancient district between the Vistula River and the Caspian Sea, occupied by the Sarmatians [Lat. Sarmatae] from the 3d cent. B.C. through the 2d cent. A.D. The term is vague and is also used to refer to the territory along the Danube and across the Carpathians where the Sarmatians were later driven by the Huns. The Sarmatians, who until c.200 B.C. lived E of the Don River, spoke an Indo-Iranian language and were a nomadic pastoral people related to the Scythians (see Scythia), whom they displaced in the Don region. The main divisions were the Rhoxolani, the Iazyges, and the Alans or Alani. They came into conflict with the Romans but later allied themselves with Rome, acting as buffers against the Germans. They were scattered or assimilated with the Germans by the 3d cent. A.D.

The common Indo European phonetic mutation allowed -m > -mb > -b from Sarmoi > Serboi.
The name of Sarmatians derived from PIE Root / lemma: ker-6 and k̂er- : 'dark colour; dirt, etc'.
ahd. horo, Gen. horawes, mhd. hor, hurwe `ordure, smut' (*kr̥-u-); ags. horh, Gen. horwes, ahd. horg `dirty, filthy' (*kr̥-k-u̯-o); aisl. horr m. ` nasal mucus, snot, smut'; ags. hrot m. ` snot ', ahd. hroz ds., asächs. hrottag `snotty'; ahd. ruoz, rouz, mhd. ruoz, ruost, asächs. hrot `smut'; ags. hrum m. `smut', asächs. hrum, mhd. PN Rum-olt;
Maybe Sarmoi > Serboi, Srb from lit. sarma `gray, white weasel' [common PIE b > w mutation].
Both root names Hrv (Croat) and Srb (Serb) are interchangeable: s > h, b > v phonetic mutations. Clearly Srb (Serb) is the origin of the latter Hrv (Croat).
lit. šir̃vas `gray, greyish-blue' (*k̂r̥-u̯o-s), šir̃mas ds. (*k̂r̥-mo-s), lett. sirms `gray' (compare ai. śyā-má- `black, dark' besides śyā-vá- ds.); lit. šir̃vis `hare'; in addition lit. šarmà f. ` hoarfrost', lett. sarma, serma ds., lit. šarmuõ, šermuõ `ermine' (:ahd. harmo, ven.-illyr. carmō); šarmuonỹs m. `weasel', with ablaut ostlit. širmuonė̃lis ds., lett. sermulis m. `ermine';
The Indo European root/lemma Root / lemma: ker-6 and k̂er- : 'dark colour; dirt, etc' could be a collective name for Sarmatea 'dark people'.
Yet the origin of the name Sarmat could be an Indo European interpretation of Sabar (Sabat) common PIE b > mb > m phonetic mutation].
Serbs and Croats would retain their sumptuous Turkic names in contrast to their Slav mercenaries called Slovenians. Bosnia was populated by an Illyrian tribe called Besoi which eventually drowned under the Slavic tide. Montenegro would be called by Serbs as Crna Gora 'black mountain'. The true Slavs who defeated the Avars in the Balkans were actually Slovenians. They would impose their language on defeated Serbs, Montenegrins, Croats and Macedonian Avars. Bulgar Avars would suffer the same identity crises while Huns managed to survive in their tiny kingdom.


The origin of the name Serb from an Indo European root seems incredible. Serbian toponyms in their homeland in Caucasus are often remote to Slavic tongues.

Azerbaijan Ser-Abad : Serboi Greek reading.

Both names Serboi earlier Sabar and Hrvat (Croat) earlier Havar, Avar seem to have originated in the shores of the Caspian Sea. The forefathers of Serbs and Croats were not Indo European but Caucasian.
The names of Asian tribes Sabar and Kavar (*Havar) Avar derived from the same root [common shift b > v, also allophones s/ h].

Serbs (*Sabar) and Croats (Hrvat) were Avar tribes which Magyar sources essentially call Kabar and Kavar.

The remnant of Sabar, Avar excellent horsemanship in Turkish language was stamped in the cognate: tr. süvari ' cavalier, cavalry, cavalryman, chevalier, mounted troops, man'. Clearly the origin of Serbs and Croats is not Indo European. Although they adopted the language of their slaves, the Sabar and Avar overlords preserved their original name. Franks, a Germanic tribe who had conquered Gaul also lost its ancient language against numerically superior native population.


Turkish Identity of Avar People

In order to illuminate the state of affairs in brief, it should be beneficial to determine these 3 issues stated below:
a) 100 years before the collapse of Juan-Juan domination in the Central Asia (the events in 461-465, see Sabar people, Ogur people), the Byzantine historian Priskos (in the middle of the 5th century) dealt with the "Avar" tribe that existed in the western Siberian region. Another resource (Zakharias Rhetor, in the years of 550) cited about an "Avar" community in the west before the occurrence of the Mongolian events. In addition to these facts, the ancient Greek geographer, Strabon (1st century DC) stated that he dealt with "Abar-noi" people in his work and that the name of "Abaris" was used in combination with he Greek legends in the very ancient histories.

b) According to these records, it is obvious that the relevant Avar (Abat) people did not have any relation or relevance with the Mongolian Juan-Juan people that were totally abolished in the year of 555 DC.

c) Actually, it is of significance that the Byzantine historian Th. Simokattes (2nd quarter of the 7th century) had made a classification about Avar people such as "Real Avar" and "Fake Avar". According to the results obtained from the researches carried out upon this record, the group called as "Fake Avar" was composed of Warkhon (in other words, Var and Hund: in Simokattes) people that were the neighbors of the Oguz tribes living in the region between the Western Turkestan- Northern Caucasus and within the environs of Don-Idyll (Volga) Rivers and that were named as "Avar" in the Byzantine resources (Menandros, the end of 6th century).

These two Turkish groups that used to speak Turkish with Y like Gokturk, Hun peoples, etc. deserted from the government of Juan-Juan family that they were subject to after the year of 350 and they turned towards the west. These two tribes participated in the establishment of Ak Hun (Eftalit) State in Turkestan- Afghanistan- Northern India. Then, they got separated from the foreign domination in Mongolia pursuant to the defeats of Juan-Juan people against the Tabgaç armies in the years of 458-459. These War (var) and Hun tribes that came to the region of Caspian Sea-the north of Lake Aral constituted a Turkish tribal union and they were collectively named as Apar (Abar, Avar) in accordance with the occupations that they had.

Therefore, the founders and the dominant majority of the European Avar Khanate were composed of the crowded Turkish groups that came from the central regions of Asia and united with the Ogur tribes that they encountered in the plain lands of the southern Russia and the other Iranian foreign elements such as Mongolian, Alan people, etc. that retreated towards the west under pressure due to the political expansion of the Gok- Turk State.

Some of the Turkish administrative offices that were present in the Avar Khanate were essentially named with Turkish idioms (the titles such as Tudun, Yugruş, Tarhan, Boyar, Ban, etc.). Similarly, it is beyond doubt that the Avar statesmen that made history were of Turkish origin. Additionally, the name of the famous ruler Bayan was a Turkish name.

The statement that the Mongoloid type was dominant in the skeletons excavated from the tombs pertaining to the Avar period is not convincing. Actually, some archaeological excavations pertaining to Avar period were carried out in the regions that were within the domination fields of the Avar Empire (Hungary, Albania, Croatia, Czechoslovakia, Austria, the southern Germany) until the year of 1970s. As a result of these excavations, it has been determined that the Turkish type (brachycephalic) had a significant level among various types such as Germanic, Slav, Iranian, Finno-Ugrian, etc.

Origin of Avar People

Avar people established a powerful state in the Central Europe between the Frank Kingdom and the Byzantine Empire upon the support of the Turkish groups such as the ancient Hun and Sabar residuals and Oguz (Bulgarian) people, etc. They established dominion over various Germanic and particularly the crowded Slav tribes. Therefore, the Avar people had directed the course of the policy of Europe for nearly 250 years (558-805). The subject matter about the origin of Avar people has been one of the issues that caused great trouble for the historians and the linguists. It cannot be stated that there is a common opinion of the experts formed about this issue. However, the Turkish identity of the founders of the European Avar Khanate become much more definite as the researches are carried out on a much more extensive basis.

The Byzantine historian Th. Simokattes (2nd quarter of the 7th century) had stated that a group composed of nearly 20 thousands of people immigrated to the west pursuant to the abolition of the Ju-an-Juan State in Mongolia (in the beginning of the 4th century- 552/555) by the Gok-Turk State. This statement caused the establishment of a relation between the group that sent an envoy from the eastern borders of the Byzantine in the year of 558 and applied for allowance and residential lands for settlement and the groups that oriented from the Central Asia towards the west and then to the central regions of Europe. The general and mistaken consideration of the Juan-Juan as "Avar" and mostly "Asian Avar People" reinforced this opinion of relevance.

On the other hand, since Juan-Juan people were considered as Mongolians, it was natural that the European Avar people were of the same race. In the end of the previous century, a tribe named as Var-guni (Bar-guni) was determined to exist in Mongolia that reminded the European Avar People. In addition, it was stated that the human skeletons that were excavated from the tombs pertaining to the Avar era in Hungary were mostly Mongoloid. Furthermore, the allegation stating that Bayan that was the name of Avar Ruler was a Mongolian word reinforced this conviction.


Relations between Avar People and the Byzantine and their Penetration into Europe


Avar people abolished the Sabar domination in the year of 558 and advanced towards Caucasus. Then, they established domination of the Iranian Alan people and the Ogur tribes and sent envoys to the Byzantine. These Avar people wanted the payment of an annual tax and the allocation of lands for settlement. Meanwhile, the emperor Justinianos was occupied with extensive conquests in the Balkans and in Dalmatia and the struggles against the Ogur people that tried to invade the Thrace all of a sudden.

Therefore, the emperor rejected the payment of the tax. Then, he tried to set up a barrier composed of crowded Slav groups including particularly Ant people in the lower Danube basin in order to stop any possible Avar raid towards his country: However, Avar people that could surmount this obstacle easily in the year of 562 invaded the lower section of Danube River and they shared the same borders with the Byzantine. Then, they started to organize raids towards the central regions of Europe. Due to the hesitation of the Emperor Justinos (565-578) in the payment of the taxes, they suppressed the Byzantine under the government of Hakan Bayan since the years of 565 and they penetrated into the Cental Karpat.

They collaborated with Longobard people that constituted one of the Germanic tribes in the west of the Danube River. Then, they established dominion over Gepid people in the Eastern Hungary. Upon the migration of the Longobard people to the Northern Italy in the year of 568, they invaded the entire Hungary of today. Therefore, the Avar people had established a great state in the Central Europe. Afterwards, they defited the Frank king Siegebert in the west and captured the important Byzantine border citadels such as Singidunum (Belgrade) and Sirmium (Eszek), etc. in the south.

The great organiser, Bayan Hakan who accomplished the conquests stated above came to Çorlu in order to advance towards Istanbul in the year of 592 and the Byzantine capital city was seized with fear. Meanwhile, the entire regions extending from the northern Slav regions towards Italy had become the military operational fields of the Abar people.

Blockade of Istanbul by Avar People in 626


The principal core of the army of the Avar Khanate was composed of Turks and this army was supported by the crowded backup troops that were recruited from various Slav and Germanic tribes. It has been understood that the Avar Khanate tried to maintain the safety and security of the principal market cities and the trade routes. The important military attempts of the Avar people in the course of their domination in Europe for a period of 200 years were the military blockades of Istanbul. The first blockade (in 617 or 619) was carried out by Avar people upon the collaboration with Sasani State and this blockade was so impressive that even the Emperor Herakleios (610-641) thought of the abandoning the capital city and going to Kartaca. Pursuant to this first blockade, the second operation was carried out jointly with the cooperation of the Sasani Empire again (626). In these years, the Iranian-Byzantine wars became more severe and cruel and the Sehinshah Husrev II (590-628) captured the entire el-Cezire, Palestine and Syria.

Under these circumstances, the emperor Herakleios who was in the coasts of the Eastern Black Sea went to Tbilisi in order to provide military help and assistance from the Khazar Turks. At the same time, the Iranian army under the command of Şahrvaraz passed through the entire Anatolia and reached to Bosphorus. Concurrently, the Avar army that was supported by the Bulgarian forces passed over the Balkans and Thrace and came in front of the city walls of Istanbul. The actual military blockade was carried out by the Avar army (in July-August 626). This operation that aroused great excitement in the capital city that was defended by the Patriarch Sergios and Patricius Bonos left historical memoirs behind. The day that was declared as a "holiday" for the commemoration of the salvation (on Saturday in the 5th week of the "Great Fast") was memorialized in the form of ceremonies organized in the churches for centuries and it has been understood that the hymn of "Akathistos" was related with this Avar blockade.

The military blockade failed due to the lack of a navy and therefore, the Avar army had to retreat under difficult situations without the attainment of any result. This situation caused the khanate to lose its influence and prestige and the advance towards the decline. The backup troops got dispersed. Particularly after the death of the ruler in the year of 630, the subject groups rebelled upon the encouragement and support of the Byzantine. As a result of the long struggles, the Balkans were captured by the Bulgarians. The region of Danube-Sava was left to the Slav tribes such as Croatian, Slovenian, etc. and the Bohemian region was abandoned to the ancestors of the Czech people. Therefore, the Avar Khanate was surrounded within the circle of hostile states and it lost its economical opportunities and facilities.

It gradually lost power during the 8th century. As a result of the attacks and raids of Frank Empire (Karolus Magnus= the period of Carlemagne: 768-814)-with a severe and cruel holy war- that lasted incessantly for 15 years since the year of 791 (the fortified capital city of Avar people in the Central Hungary was captured in the period of Pepin in 776), the Avar Khanate was totally abolished (805). The Avar groups that got disintegrated spread within the Eastern Hungary and the Balkans. Within a short period, they became Christians and they got assimilated within the native people.


However, it has been observed that the Avar influence kept going in Europe. The traces of their mementoes include the title of "Ban" that was one of the highest military-governmental titles among the Croatian people (Baga in Gok-Turk language and Bagan in Avar language that was present among the Bulgarians and Hungarians) and the titles such as Boyar and Yugruş, etc. and the name of the cities such as Navarino in Greece (=Pylos, with the original form of Avarino), and Antivari in Albania (=Br, with its ancient form of Civitas Avarorum). Furthermore, the archaeological works pertaining to the Avar period that were excavated in Hungary (the cast tools and horse harnesses with the animal fight descriptions upon these materials) are accepted as the examples of the Turkish art in Europe (animal style) that originally developed in the Central Asia and the traces of this style can also be observed in France in the period of Movergin family.

The Protsotvats golden treasury in Albania pertains to Avar people. Additionally, the archaeological researches have also displayed the influence of Avar Turkish art over the Germanic and Slavic arts. A treasure composed of 23 units of golden pots with Turkish inscriptions on them was found in the site of Nagy Szent in the Central Hungary in the year of 1799 and the question about the Turkish tribe to which this treasure belonged is a still debated issue. However, it has been alleged that this famous treasure belonged to the period of Avar people.

As a consequence; the domination of Avar people in Europe for more than two centuries is of great significance for several reasons in respect of the European history. First of all, the Slavic tribes had lived under the long-term Turkish domination for the first time and they found the opportunity to advance from the stage of "tribal" life to the stage of state organization due to the influence of Turkish state and military organizations. Secondly, the Turks had much more blended with various Germanic (Frank) groups. This relation has been mostly composed of reciprocal struggles; however, both tribes were forced to resolve a state of coping in the capacity of neighboring groups.

Influences of Avar People over Slavs


It has been understood that the Avar Khanate had had influence particularly over the Islamic tribes. It has been known that as a result of the precautions taken by Avar people, the first Slav groups settled in the Balkans in an essential manner. There are some indicators that showed that this Turkish tribe established domination over the southern and the eastern Slavs for a long time and most of the Slavic tribes were totally defeated by the Avar people.

The Slavic groups were under the domination of German Goths until the 4th century and then, they were under the domination of Turks subject to the Hun Empire. The history of the Slavic communities has turned into nearly "a part of the Turkish history" from that date on. The disperse of crowded Slavic groups towards various Eastern Europe regions and the Balkans took place mostly in the period of Avar people. These large-scaled migrations were arranged and implied by the Avar government. Therefore, the Avar government led them to undertake the agricultural works in order to yield the harvest and crops that were needed by the Avar Khanate and the performance of border forefront services at the same time.

Therefore, various Slavic tribes were directed towards today's Czechoslovakia and the banks of Elbe River, the coasts of Dalmatia and the Balkans. In the years of 750, it was cited that there was some Slav people that were called as "Avar" within the environs of Athens. In the same periods, the names of the leaders that led the Croatian people to the Adriatic coasts were listed as follows: Kiıliik, Lobel (Alp-el?), Kösenci (Koşuncu), Buga, Tugay. It has been alleged that there were some Avar beys that became Slavs who were the leaders of 9th Pannonia (Western Hungary) and Morva Slav groups. On the other hand, it has been declared that the German tribes abandoned their homelands in the Czech country as a result of the pressure of Avar leaders rather than Slav people that were so weak in respect of war capabilities.

It has also been stated that this situation was confirmed with the works related with Avar art that were found in the Eastern Hungary. Therefore, according to the statement of Bishop Syrian Johannes in the year of 584, "While the Slav people could not dare even to get out of the forests in the past, the Slavs got accustomed to war by means of the Avar people and they became the owners of gold, silver, and herds of horses. They were oriented towards migration in a systematic manner. Therefore, it has been understood that the ethnical map of today's Central and Eastern Europe was drawn by the Avar Khanate. The Avar groups that live in the Caucasus today are accepted as the descendants of them.


Name of Sabar

It has been determined through the unorganized information in various foreign resources that this Turkish community had played an important role in the Western Siberia and the northern region of the Caucasus in the 5th-6th centuries DC. This Turkish community was named as Sabar, Sabir, and Savir in the Byzantine resources and as Savır, Sabr, S(a)bir, Sibir, etc. in the Armenian, Syrian Christian, and Islamic resources.

The allegations stating that the Sabar people were of Slav or Mongolian or Finno-Ugrian origin had become out-of-date. Today, it has been understood that they were Turks in origin in respect of the names that they hold and the historical and cultural characteristics. As a result of the labial attraction in various languages, the word of Sabar has been observed in various forms. The word of Sabar that can only be identified with Turkish language was formulated as the addition of the suffix of +ar to the verb of "sab+ar" (=sap-ar= sapmak/ violate, deviate) (Some other examples are: Khazar, Bulgar, Kabar, etc). It has the meaning of "deviationist, defector, uncontrolled, free" and it is in compliance with the naming procedures among the Turks. Furthermore, the personal names pertaining to Sabar people are also Turkish. Balak, İlig-er, Bo-arık =Buğ-arık, etc.





Ancient History of Sabar People


The ancient periods of Sabar people are not known well. If they had separated from a main group in accordance with the meaning of their names, they must have been one of the communities subject to the Great Hun Empire that lived in the region of the west of Tien Shan Mountains- Ili River that was their homeland. The first definite information about Sabar people was provided by the Byzantine historian Priskos (5th century) on the occasion of the great movement among the Western Siberian tribes between the years of 461-465 and the large-scaled events of migrations. Against the Avar pressure that came from the east, the Sabar people abandoned their lands and oriented towards the west. They drove the Ogur-Turk tribes that lived in the plain lands between Altay-Ural Mountains (the southern region of today's Kyrgyzstan steppe lands) from their homeland. Then, they settled within the environs of Tobol and İçim Rivers.

Sabar people had had profound influences in this region through their culture that was superior to the cultures of the native people that lasted for centuries: The names of places and castles such as Sabar, Saber (Tapar), Soper, Savri, Sabrei, Sıbır (Sı-vır), etc. are much widespread within the environs of Tobolsk and on the banks of Ob, Tura and Irtish. The personal names such as Ay-sabar, Kün-sabar, etc. have also been encountered. The people of Tobolsk have called the ancient inhabitants of this region as Sybyr, Syvyr.

Furthermore, Sabar people have an important place in the folk tales and heroic short stories of the people in this region. Apart from Ostiyak people that considered Sabar people as their celebrities, the Vogul people have also called the Russians with the name of "Sa-per" that they were subject to. All these events indicate the superior characteristics of the ancient Sabar people in the public opinion. The capital city of the Sibir Khanate that was founded in the same region (16th century) had the name of Sibir.

This word identified a wide geographical area in the course of time (Siberia)… The Russians had captured the city of Sibir (Isker) and then called the region with this name. Then, this name indicated much wider regions upon the advance of the Russian movement. Therefore, the keepsake of the Sabar Turks has survived until nowadays.


Sabar People in the Eastern Europe


Sabar people had expanded their domination towards the Eastern Europe in the very early year of 503 and they subdued some of the Bulgarian groups. A crowded group of Sabar people settled between the Idyll (Volga)- Don Rivers and on the banks of Kuban River that was located in the north of the Caucasus. Therefore, they were directly in contract with the Byzantine and Sassani State. These situations led them to have a priority in the history of the Eastern Europe. In those years while the Iranian- Byzantine wars kept ongoing, Sabar people had a large-scaled military operation under the command of Balak (Belek?). Then, Sabar people collaborated with Sassani people and fought against the Byzantine (516).
It has been known that they organized some raids towards the Armenia region and then penetrated into Anatolia and advanced towards Caesarea Cappadociae, Ankara, and Iconium. On this occasion, the Byzantine must have been lost in amazement due to the great war power and especially the high techniques of the war materials. The expressions of Prokopios are significant: "Sabar people have machines that have not been designed either by Iranians and the Roman people since the periods that the human being remembered. There was always a scientist in each two empires and they made war machines in every period. However, any invention that was similar to the materials of these barbarians have not been invented or used like they did so far.

It is beyond doubt that this is the masterpiece of the human wisdom." Pursuant to Balak (died in 520s), his widow wife, Bo(ğ)arık that replaced him was a famous Turkish queen that was well-known with her warrior and governor characteristics and her beauty. She commanded the Sabar army that was composed of "100 thousands" of people. The Byzantine Emperor Justinian (527-565) preferred to conclude an agreement with Boğarık in return for various silver made vases and the other rich gifts and presents (528). The Byzantine must have considered that it would be a more appropriate political stance to collaborate with Sabar people and establish friendly terms in the Sasani War that was ongoing for centuries.

Collapse of Sabar People


Any clear evidence pertaining to the following period could not be obtained about the Sabar people that seemed to have been in cooperation with the Byzantine until the year of 531. It has been anticipated that they suffered from terrible losses and casualties in the continuous and successful wars of Sasani State in the Caucasus (especially in 545) in the period of Şehinshah Anuşirvan (Adil). As a result of this decline, they lost their military power and they had a terrible strike from Avar people towards the year of 557. After a short period, the Sabar regions were under the domination of the Gok-Turk State that reached to the Black Sea.
In the year of 576, their domination in the Caucasus was abolished by the Byzantine. Then, some of Sabar people were settled in the south of Kura River. Their name was observed in an unorganized manner until the middle of the 7th century. It has been understood that Sabar people constituted the main community of the Khazar people that came into existence as a great state in the same region in these years. Similarly, it has been observed that Belencer and Semender tribes that were considered as Khazar tribes were essentially two big Sabar groups.




The original Serbs and Croats were Central Asian Sarmatian nomads who entered Europe with the Huns in the fourth century A.D. The Sarmatian Serbs settled in a land designated as White Serbia, in what is now Saxony and Western Poland. The Sarmatian Serbs, it is argued, intermarried with the indigenous Slavs of the region, adopted their language, and transferred their name to the Slavs. Byzantine sources report that some Serbs migrated southward in the seventh century A.D. and eventually settled in the lands that now make up southern Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia, and Hercegovina. Rival chiefs, or zupani, vied to control the Serbs for five centuries after the migration. Zupan Vlastimir formed a Serbian principality under the Byzantines around 850, and the Serbs soon converted to Eastern-rite Christianity. The Serbs had two political centers in the eleventh century: Zeta, in the mountains of present-day Montenegro, and Raska, located in modern southwestern Serbia.

The proto-Serbs were part of the Caucasian Race much like the Georgians, Mingrelians, Lezghians, Ingush, and spoke a language similar to these peoples. At some point in the history of the Serbs, this Old Serb language stood side by side with the Slavic language in White Serbia (Porphyrogenitus) and likely even in the first 300 years leading up to the formation of the Serb state on the Balkans in the 9th century. Even to this day, the Serb language has at least a third as many words in its vocabulary than other Slavic languages. This is because of the influence of Old Serb and Illyrian as well as Turkish on the Slavic language spoken by Serbs today. Here is a list of Old Serb words which exist side by side with Slavic words in the modern Serb language.

The Serbs were mentioned by Plinius the Younger in the first century BC (69-75) as living on the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov as Serboi in his Geographica. In the 2nd century, Herodotus writes in his Persian Wars that Serbs (Serboi, Sirboi - Serboi, Sirboi) live behind the Caucasus, near the hinterland of the Black Sea. In the fourth century the Carpathians are mentioned as 'Serb mountains' by the Roman emperor Licinius.

In the Caucasus, the homeland of the Serbs, they left their traces around the river Volga (Araxes in Greek). In modern Georgian, that river is called "Rashki". This name was used by Balkan Serbs as a name for their first state and is found wherever the name Serb is found in clusters indicating settlements. It is often used to designate hydronyms and likely meant 'river' or 'water' in Old Serb.

The Serbs migrated in two directions from the Caucasus, northwest and northeast. Those who went northwest became overlords to the Slavs. There they established a mighty empire and became slavicized. Konstantine Porfirogenitus called this "White Serbia". Their descendants are known as Lusatian Serbs today and despite immense Germanization, there are still a few thousand left. These we will call 'White Serbs'.

The other branch moved northeast to the southern base of the Urals, settled there for a period of time and split into two. We will call them 'Volga Serbs'. One tribe moved west and eventually met up with the above mentioned White Serbs. The other moved east and went deep into Siberia and left its traces in the names of cities and towns along the coast of the Sea of Japan. They faded out with onslaught from the Mongols. These we will call 'Siberian Serbs'. It seems likely that Siberia was named after this Old Serb tribe.

(vazhdon)

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:42 pm
by ALBPelasgian
(vazhdon prej pjeses se mesiperme)

It seems that the western branch of the Volga Serbs, upon their rendezvous with the White Serbs did not stay long. They must have found the White Serbs completely Slavicized by then (6th century). The descendants of these Slavicized white Serbs are today's Lusation Sorbs. This would explain why Lusatian Sorbs did not pick up the Caucasian words of the original Serb language while Balkan Serbs retained theirs. The western Volga branch of the Serbs must have left White Serbia immediately upon their own arrival, and according to Porfirogenitus, came to the Balkans (7th cent), invited by Heracleus, defeated the Avars and were given Macedonia to inhabit. There they took the already settled Slavs (who began arriving in the 5th and 6th cents) under their control and became Slavicized much as the White Serbs.

These Slavs who came before the Serbs had already assimilated the Illyrians, who were an Indo European people.

Most contemporary historians agree that the old Serbs were no Slavs, at all, but a non-Slavic caste ruling over Slavs.

Serbs: living among the ancient peoples of the Black Sea
The first mention of the Serbs ('Serboi') in history locates them in the Caucasus among the Dinaric peoples of Ibero-caucasian linguistic stock.
Here are a few of the earsliest quotations from well known ancient geographers and historians:


Strabon (63 - 19. god. stare ere)
"...the rivier Ksant is called Srbika by the natives."
( Strabonis rerum geographicarum libri septendicini, Basileza 1571 s. 763)

Plinius (69-75 AD)
"... beside the Cimerians live Meotics, Valians Serbs (Serboi), Zingians, Psesians."
("On Nature" "A Cimmerio accolunt Meadici, Vali, Serbi, Zingi, Psesii - Plinius Ceacilius Secundus Historia naturalis, VI, c. 7 & 19 Leipzig 1975)

Claudius Ptolomei (150 AD) - geographer
" ... between the Keraunian mountains and the river Pa, live the Orineians, Valians and Serbs."
(Claudius Ptolomaius, Geographica... V, s. 9)


A theory on Avars and their relations to the Serbs
Alex Petrovic

The Caucasian Avars who conquered the Balkans have given Serbia, Crna Gora, and Croatia the names each respectively bears today. In the Lesghian-Avar language, the Balkan Crna Gora carries the same toponym of the land they left behind in the Caucasus: also called Crna Gora, now part of Daghestan. In the Lesghian-Avar language: Srbi means "people." Also, in the Lesghian-Avar language: Albania is the land they called their homeland, neighboring Armenia, once known as Ancient Caucasian Albania, dating back 2,000 years ago, but still found in old maps. Yet the name Albania derived from the Illyrian tribe Albanoi. The Illyrian mercenaries took part in the campaign of Alexander the Great in India. Some of these tribes settled in the Caucasus region while others continued the journey towards India. Illyrian foot-soldiers created military stations for the Macedonian army for a safe return. The very name Albania has no cognates in Caucasian languages so it is not a native eponym. The name Albanoi derives from Indo European Root / lemma: albho-: 'white'.

Obviously the ancestors of the Serbs, Montenegrins, and Croats were Avar tribes (not to be confused with Mongol tribes near Siberia) from the Caucasus, however the indigenous people such as the Thracians, Dacians, Illyrians, and Slav retainers, were fussed with them, giving mixed signals to us all today. Serbs and Croats think they are pure Slavs, which they are not. The Montenegrins think they are Polabs who have been christianized by Rome, which is not true.
The Avars were totally assimilated by the Thracians and Slavs, and their vestiges live on in Serbs, Montenegrins and Croats so does their spirit. The Council of Chalcedon changed many things for them but they continued to exist as part of the Khazar Confederacy (Khazar is a Turkic word for Georgians or Circassians) always keeping Byzantine ties rather than Latin ones. They paid great heed to their dead and had 26 tribes, including clans, like the Montenegrins.


Contemporary historians on the Serbs

Most of the Balkans had been part of the Roman Empire since the first century AD. When, in the fourth century, the decision was taken to divide the empire between Rome and Constantinople, the area was home to a mix of peoples such as Greeks, Thracians, Illyrians, Romans, Dacians and many others. There were no Slavs though. The Slavonic-speaking peoples began to migrate to the Balkans only in the early sixth century. At first they came as raiders, but by the seventh century they began to settle.

Some contend that the Slavs came from the land between the Danube and the Carpathian mountains. Others believe that they came from the Caucasus and that they were ruled by an Iranian-derived elite. What can be said with certainty is that, unlike the earlier raiding Goths and Huns who left no lasting traces in the Balkans, the Slavs came to stay. By the 580s they were a powerful force, although they appear often to have fought as subordinates to the more powerful Avars, who lived roughly in the area of modern Hungary.

The constant warfare of this period led to the depopulation of large areas into which the Slavs were to move. These first Slavs cannot be identified as Serbs, Croats or Bulgarians -- they were 'undifferentiated' Sllavs. These three named tribes were now to arrive by diverse routes. The Croats migrated from the kingdom they had established during their migrations in southern Poland. The Serbs moved to the Balkans after briefly settling in areas that now fall within the Czech lands. It is also possible that there is a connection with those areas of northeastern Germany, around Bautzen, where the Sorbs, a Slavonic-speaking community, still live.

Before these migrations, in the second century AD, Greek geographers wrote of an Iranian tribe called the Serbi or Serboi living on the River Don. Professor John Fine, one of the foremost historians of the region, writes that if the first Serbs and Croats, like the Turkic Bulgars, were not Slavs but Iranian, this is 'not important in the long run since the Iranians were a small minority in a population of Slavs. They quickly became assimilated by the Slavs and the resulting society was clearly Slavic (despite the non-Slavic origin of its ruling class).' Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, the Byzantine emperor and historian, writing in the mid-tenth century notes that some of the Serbs or Servloi were originally given land around Salonika at Serbia by the Emperor Heraclius (610-41) but that they had not stayed there, had migrated north of the Danube and had then turned southwards again.

While the origins of the Serbs and Croats are still shrouded in mystery it is clear that from the very beginning these two distinct but close tribes moved one beside the other. Their histories have always been entwined. How close the tribes were is attested by the fact that they spoke, and still speak, virtually the same language. The Slav spread through the Balkans carried on until about 800 when it not only stopped but, in certain areas such as Greece and Albania, appears to have been reversed.

Tim Juddah


"Most scholars believe either that both Serbs and Croats were Slavic tribes with Iranian castes, or that they were originally Iranian tribes which had acquired Slavic subjects... What is clear is that the Serbs and Croats had a similar and connected history from the earliest of times..."

N. Malcolm.


"The Slavs settled in Bosnia (as well as Serbia, Croatia, and Montenegro) in the late sixth and early seventh centuries. They appeared in small tribal units but were drawn from a single Slavic confederation-the Slaveni. Thus the Bosnians come from the same Slavic base as today's Serbs and Croats. In the second quarter of the seventh century, the Croatians (who were probably of Iranian origin) invaded and asserted their overlordship over the Slavs (Slaveni) in Croatia and parts of Bosnia. In regions to the south and east of Bosnia, the Serbs (also probably Iranians) came to predominate over the Slavs there."
John V. A. Fine


The so called 'pure race' is an idealized point of view of anthropologists. European people are not pure races. He who says to be racial and ethno-biological pure, in fact pleads for it own biological degeneration. Along with that Serbs and Croats are maybe not even Slavs, according to some ethnologists. During the ethnical waves that whipped across the Balkans between the 5th and 7th century, they arrived on the Balkans as two quite unimportant en not very crowded tribes, from their home countries White Croatia and White Serbia (that also in that time bounded towards each other) somewhere between Caucasus and Carpathian mountains. The Croats and the Serbs came on the 6th century on the Balkans (and quarreled since than about who came first) after they were expelled by the Mongols, and they came as foot-soldiers of the Avarian people. According to some scientists the word Serb 'Srb' and the word Croat 'Hrvat' even come from the Avaric language, which could be so because they can not be related to Slavic words.

Which leftovers are purely Croat, and which purely Serb? The Croatian historiographer from the 19th century Natko Nodilo wonders himself. 'I do not know the answer like an Englishman doesn't know the difference between the old Angelic and Saxon heathens.
The Serb Name in the Caucasus Region



The Republic of Georgia:
Serbaisi, Georgia, Republic of Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.32, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
41.9500
Longitude
43.3000
Altitude (feet)
1692\
Lat (DMS)
41° 57' 0N
Long (DMS)
43° 17' 60E
Altitude (meters)
515
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=41.95 ... f&alt=1692

Serebryannoye, Georgia, Republic of Page
Latitude
43.3667
Longitude
40.8000
Altitude (feet)
2437
Lat (DMS)
43° 22' 0N
Long (DMS)
40° 47' 60E
Altitude (meters)
742
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=43.36 ... f&alt=2437


Serebryanoye, Georgia, Republic of Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.58, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
43.3283
Longitude
40.8539
Altitude (feet)
2372
Lat (DMS)
43° 19' 42N
Long (DMS)
40° 51' 14E
Altitude (meters)
722
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=43.32 ... f&alt=2372



Serebryanyy, Georgia, Republic of Page
Latitude
43.3667
Longitude
40.8000
Altitude (feet)
2437
Lat (DMS)
43° 22' 0N
Long (DMS)
40° 47' 60E
Altitude (meters)
742
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=43.36 ... f&alt=2437


Armenia:
Serebryanyy, Georgia, Republic of Page
Latitude
43.3667
Longitude
40.8000
Altitude (feet)
2437
Lat (DMS)
43° 22' 0N
Long (DMS)
40° 47' 60E
Altitude (meters)
742
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=43.36 ... f&alt=2437


Azerbaijan:
Serebovski, Azerbaijan Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 5.91, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
40.3956
Longitude
49.9736
Altitude (feet)
403
Lat (DMS)
40° 23' 44N
Long (DMS)
49° 58' 25E
Altitude (meters)
122
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=40.39 ... an&alt=403

Serebrovskiy, Azerbaijan Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 5.55, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
40.3956
Longitude
49.9736
Altitude (feet)
403
Lat (DMS)
40° 23' 44N
Long (DMS)
49° 58' 25E
Altitude (meters)
122
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=40.39 ... an&alt=403

Seri-abad, Azerbaijan Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 5.66, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
39.3736
Longitude
48.5767
Altitude (feet)
3
Lat (DMS)
39° 22' 25N
Long (DMS)
48° 34' 36E
Altitude (meters)
0
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=39.37 ... ijan&alt=3

Ser-Abad, Azerbaijan Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.57, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
39.3783
Longitude
48.5975
Altitude (feet)
3
Lat (DMS)
39° 22' 42N
Long (DMS)
48° 35' 51E
Altitude (meters)
0
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=39.37 ... ijan&alt=3




There are also countless Serb toponyms (too many to list) found all over Russia, Ukraine, Belorussia, Czech and Slovak Republics, Poland, Germany to attest to the migration of Serbs from the Caucasus to northern Europe and to their present location in the Balkans.

At first we find the Serb name in the above mentioned locations in the Caucasus. Then we find the Serb name breaking into two directions with one branch shifting NORTHWEST out of the Caucasus region into southern Russia towards the Ukraine and Central Europe. We find the Serb name moving across the Ukraine and along the Carpathians into Central Europe. It is appropriate to note that the in the third century Roman emperor Licinius referred to the Carpathians as 'Serb mountains'.

We find another row of Serb toponyms moving northeast from the Caucasus towards the base of the Ural mountains. At the base of the Ural mountains we find a cluster of Serb toponyms. We can conclude that this branch of Serbs settled there for a period of time. Then we notice Serb toponyms moving in two directions. One going eastbound deep into Asia moving along the Kama river and the other going WESTBOUND following the river Volga into Ukraine Poland. It is likely that this divergent movement happened because of a disagreement between the Serb tribal leaders of this tribe of 'Ural Serbs'. This faction which moved WESTBOUND eventually met up with the first group of Serbs which immediately left the Caucasus for Central Europe, as the direction of toponyms shows. This land eventually became to be called 'White Serbia' by Konstantine Porphyrogenitus.

We can conclude based on the distance of toponyms one from the other that they are the most dense in the modern Czech Republic, Western Ukraine, and southern Poland as well as Eastern Germany. This may have been the size of the 'White Serbia' which Porphyrogenitus spoke of. It would have been even by modern standards a large European nation. South of it was 'White Croatia' as we can tell by Croatian toponyms in Slovak and Hungarian lands.

Having migrated from the southern Caucasus to the north, as we can see by the shift in the toponyms northward, we see other Serb toponyms moving eastward towards the Ural mountains and the Kama river and we even find Serb toponyms along Russia's border with China. It would appear that when the Serbs left the Caucasus region they split into two groups moving in separate directions. One moved into the southern Ukraine and along the Carpathians into Northern Europe the other eastbound to the base of the Ural mountains. We see a string of Serb toponyms from there moving westbound along the Volga and another string on the same longitude moving eastbound deep into Siberia. Along the coast of the Sea of Japan there are two towns named 'Serbia' and two other towns named after the Serb toponym Rashka (a name the Serbs took to them wherever they went; it is distinctly Serb and not Slavic, it might have meant river, this would explain the many hydronyms derived from 'Rash' in Poland, Germany and Russia where Old Serbs settled).

Serb toponyms aren't thrown around Europe and Asia randomly, they are often in rows and lines one after the other, moving in a particular direction:

1. northwest from the Caucasus along present the Carpathians into Central Europe.
2. northeast from the Caucasus to the Urals into Siberia.
3. from the Urals westbound to Central Europe.


It is wisest to conclude that diverging Serb toponyms mark the path various Serb tribes took while they were migrating from the Caucasus to Europe and Asia. Interestingly the migrations are not in accordance to Slavic migrations, thus implying that Serbs were overlords to the Slavs and migrated and existed together with the Slavs.

Here are the locations of Serb toponyms in alphabetical order:
Sarbai 58N 49E 152 498
Sarbaktuy 51N 116E 557 1827
Sarbala 53N 87E 232 761
Sarbala 60N 43E 111 364
Sarbalin 54N 74E 103 337
Sarbalyk 55N 76E 110 360
Sarbayevo 55N 45E 249 816
Sarbay 51N 57E 412 1351
Sarbay 52N 56E 182 597
Sarbay 53N 51E 198 649
Sarbay 54N 56E 145 475
Sarbay 58N 49E 152 498
Sarba 55N 76E 110 360
Sarbiya 52N 57E 696 2283
Serbilovo 56N 40E 157 515
Serbinka 51N 43E 181 593
Serbinka 52N 36E 246 807
Serbino-Vedenyapina 51N 43E 175 574
Serbino-Vedenyapino 51N 43E 175 574
Serbinovka 54N 73E 128 419
Serbinovskiy 49N 40E 183 600
Serbino 53N 40E 160 524
Serbino 58N 28E 55 180
Serbin 45N 38E 16 52
Serboyan 55N 83E 155 508
Serbilovo 56N 40E 157 515
Serbinka 51N 43E 181 593
Serbinka 52N 36E 246 807
Serbino-Vedenyapina 51N 43E 175 574
Serbino-Vedenyapino 51N 43E 175 574
Serbinovka 54N 73E 128 419
Serbinovskiy 49N 40E 183 600
Serbino 53N 40E 160 524
Serbino 58N 28E 55 180
Serbin 45N 38E 16 52
Serbiya 51N 37E 209 685
Serbiya 52N 57E 696 2283
Serbiya 64N 142E 564 1850
Serbolovo 57N 30E 94 308
Sorbala 60N 43E 111 364
Sirbishina 57N 60E 218 715
Sirbishino 57N 60E 218 715
Srbce 49N 17E 328 1076
Srbce 49N 16E 397 1302
Srbce 50N 15E 194 636
Srbetsch 50N 13E 330 1082
Srbeˇ 50N 13E 330 1082
Srbice 49N 13E 487 1597
Srbice 49N 13E 433 1420
Srbice 49N 14E 495 1624
Srbice 50N 13E 207 679
Srbsko 49N 14E 270 885
Srbsko 50N 15E 317 1040
Srbská Kamenice 50N 14E 318 1043
Srbská 50N 15E 354 1161
Srby 49N 13E 407 1335
Srby 49N 12E 399 1309
Srby 50N 14E 426 1397
Srbín 49N 14E 439 1440


Here are the locations of RASH toponyms in order of appearance:
Georgia:
Roshka, Georgia, Republic of Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 4.14, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
42.5464
Longitude
44.9228
Altitude (feet)
5935
Lat (DMS)
42° 32' 47N
Long (DMS)
44° 55' 22E
Altitude (meters)
1808
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=42.54 ... f&alt=5935

Roshka-Khorkhi, Gora, Georgia, Republic of Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 4.76, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
42.5692
Longitude
44.8258
Altitude (feet)
9767
Lat (DMS)
42° 34' 9N
Long (DMS)
44° 49' 33E
Altitude (meters)
2976
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=42.56 ... f&alt=9767

From here, the Serbs move to two directions one NORTHEAST towards the Urals, the other NORTHWEST towards Central and Eastern Europe.

Russia:
(behind the Urals)
Rashkina, Russia Page
Latitude
59.9500
Longitude
61.5833
Altitude (feet)
131
Lat (DMS)
59° 57' 0N
Long (DMS)
61° 34' 60E
Altitude (meters)
39
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=59.95 ... ia&alt=131

Here is where there is a cluster of Serb toponyms as well. This must have been where this Serb tribe settled for a period of time. But then, one branch moved EASTBOUND deep into Siberia... to the coast of the Sea of Japan...
Rashkino, Russia Page
Latitude
43.6667
Longitude
131.7167
Altitude (feet)
456
Lat (DMS)
43° 40' 0N
Long (DMS)
131° 43' 0E
Altitude (meters)
138
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=43.66 ... ia&alt=456
Here we find two cities named Serbia and two named after Rashka.

Ukraine:
Rashkovichi, Ukraine Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 4.02, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
52.1053
Longitude
34.0717
Altitude (feet)
620
Lat (DMS)
52° 6' 19N
Long (DMS)
34° 4' 18E
Altitude (meters)
188
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=52.10 ... ne&alt=620



Rashkov, Ukraine Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.08, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
48.5000
Longitude
26.3000
Altitude (feet)
856
Lat (DMS)
48° 30' 0N
Long (DMS)
26° 18' 0E
Altitude (meters)
260
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=48.50 ... ne&alt=856

Rashkov, Ukraine Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.26, which is greater than 3.
Latitude

Longitude
25.4167
Altitude (feet)
1003
Lat (DMS)
0° 0' 0S
Long (DMS)
25° 25' 0E
Altitude (meters)
305
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi? lat=48.7333&long=25.4167&name=Rashkov&cty=Ukraine&alt=1003
Rashkuv, Ukraine Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.30, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
48.7333
Longitude
25.4167
Altitude (feet)
1003
Lat (DMS)
48° 43' 60N
Long (DMS)
25° 25' 0E
Altitude (meters)
305
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=48.73 ... e&alt=1003
Rashovka, Ukraine Page
Latitude
50.2167
Longitude
33.9000
Altitude (feet)
321
Lat (DMS)
50° 13' 0N
Long (DMS)
33° 53' 60E
Altitude (meters)
97
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.21 ... ne&alt=321
Raska, Ukraine Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.59, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
50.7500
Longitude
29.6000
Altitude (feet)
452
Lat (DMS)
50° 45' 0N
Long (DMS)
29° 36' 0E
Altitude (meters)
137
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.75 ... ne&alt=452

Poland:
We see a row of Serb toponyms throughout northern Poland and Russia. It is likely that when the Volga Serbs split into two separate tribes moving in two separate directions, the row of Serb toponyms moving through northern Russia and Poland and Ukraine may have been the route taken by this westbound group of Volga Serbs to meet up wit the first group of Serbs which immediately moved from the Caucasus into Central Europe.
Rasy, Poland Page
Very abbreviated output: load average is 19.24, which is greater than 3 (weather) and 8 (nearby links).
Latitude
51.4167
Longitude
19.3833
Altitude (feet)
734
Lat (DMS)
51° 25' 0N
Long (DMS)
19° 22' 60E
Altitude (meters)
223
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=51.41 ... nd&alt=734

Raszczyce, Poland Page
Very abbreviated output: load average is 15.64, which is greater than 3 (weather) and 8 (nearby links).
Latitude
50.1167
Longitude
18.3000
Altitude (feet)
826
Lat (DMS)
50° 7' 0N
Long (DMS)
18° 18' 0E
Altitude (meters)
251
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.11 ... nd&alt=826

Raszelki, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 6.22, which is greater than 3.
Latitude

Longitude
18.7500
Altitude (feet)
396
Lat (DMS)
0° 0' 0S
Long (DMS)
18° 45' 0E
Altitude (meters)
120
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi? lat=51.7500&long=18.7500&name=Raszelki&cty=Poland&alt=396

Raszewo, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.28, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
52.4667
Longitude
20.2667
Altitude (feet)
406
Lat (DMS)
52° 28' 0N
Long (DMS)
20° 16' 0E
Altitude (meters)
123
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=52.46 ... nd&alt=406
Raszewy, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 5.22, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
51.7167
Longitude
17.1500
Altitude (feet)
364
Lat (DMS)
51° 43' 0N
Long (DMS)
17° 8' 60E
Altitude (meters)
110
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=51.71 ... nd&alt=364
Raszewy, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 4.26, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
52.0833
Longitude
17.6000
Altitude (feet)
269
Lat (DMS)
52° 4' 60N
Long (DMS)
17° 36' 0E
Altitude (meters)
81
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=52.08 ... nd&alt=269
Raszkówek, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.40, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
51.7167
Longitude
17.7333
Altitude (feet)
456
Lat (DMS)
51° 43' 0N
Long (DMS)
17° 43' 60E
Altitude (meters)
138
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=51.71 ... nd&alt=456
Raszków, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 4.61, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
50.4833
Longitude
16.5000
Altitude (feet)
1522
Lat (DMS)
50° 28' 60N
Long (DMS)
16° 30' 0E
Altitude (meters)
463
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.48 ... d&alt=1522
Raszków, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.69, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
50.5833
Longitude
19.9333
Altitude (feet)
974
Lat (DMS)
50° 34' 60N
Long (DMS)
19° 55' 60E
Altitude (meters)
296
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.58 ... nd&alt=974
Raszków, Poland Page
Latitude
51.7167
Longitude
17.7333
Altitude (feet)
456
Lat (DMS)
51° 43' 0N
Long (DMS)
17° 43' 60E
Altitude (meters)
138
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=51.71 ... nd&alt=456
Raszowa, Poland Page
Latitude
50.3833
Longitude
18.1667
Altitude (feet)
590
Lat (DMS)
50° 22' 60N
Long (DMS)
18° 10' 0E
Altitude (meters)
179
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.38 ... nd&alt=590
Raszowa, Poland Page
Abbreviated output: load average is 3.14, which is greater than 3.
Latitude
50.6000
Longitude
18.1167
Altitude (feet)
577
Lat (DMS)
50° 36' 0N
Long (DMS)
18° 7' 0E
Altitude (meters)
175
http://www.calle.com/info.cgi?lat=50.60 ... nd&alt=577


-----------------------------------


Serbs

Serbs (in their language: Срби, transliteration: Srbi) are a south Slavic people which lives mostly in Serbia and Montenegro and Republika Srpska.



Population
Most Serbs live in the traditional Serbian heartland of Serbia and Montenegro. Large Serb populations also live in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, (where they are a constituent nation) principally in the Republika Srpska, one of the country's two largely autonomous entities). Much smaller Serb minorities also exist in Hungary, Macedonia and Romania.

The largest urban populations of Serbs in the former Yugoslavia are to be found in Belgrade, Novi Sad and Banja Luka in Bosnia. Abroad, Chicago has the largest Serb population followed by Toronto (note that Chicago has more Serbs than Novi Sad). Serbs constitute 63% of the population of Serbia, about 7 million people in all, and another 11 million people abroad claim Serbian descent.


Name
The etymology of the word "Serb" (root: Srb) is not known. Numerous theories exist, but neither could be said to be certain or even probable:

Some believe that the name is of Sarmatian origin. The main weakness of this theory is that because next to nothing is known about the Sarmatian language, virtually any word of unknown origin could be Sarmatian.
Some believe that the name is of Iranian origin. Of which word exactly is unclear.
Some believe that the name comes from the word sebar or peasant. However, as peasants did not exist in pre-medieval times while the name did, this seems unlikely.
Others say that the name comes from saborac or co-fighter. This could make sense but the words are too far apart. It is possible that saborac comes from sebar (that sebar sometimes meant co-fighter), which would make this theory more interesting but there is not much basis for this claim either.

However, one thing is certain: the name is very old. It is clearly a self-identification and not a given name as its root cannot be found in western European languages.

Regardless of the origin, the age and rarity of the name allows for certain historical conclusions based partly on it (for example, see Gordoservon below).
While Ukrainians and krajischniks (their names coming from Slavic word for "mark") or Slovaks and Slovenes (obvious variations of "Slavs") need not be related, Serbs and Sorbs may well be. Some have taken this to the extreme, creating theories that link Serbs with Sarmatians, Sirmium, Serbona, Siberia and so on.


History

Early references to "Serboi"
The tribal designation Serboi first appears in the 1st century Geography of Ptolemy (book 5, 9.21) to designate a tribe dwelling in Sarmatia, probably on the Lower Volga River. The name reappears, in the form Serbioi, in the 10th century scholar-emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitos' advice on running an empire, De administrando imperio (32.1-16), and in the continuation of Theophanes' history, the Theophanes Continuatus (288.17-20), usually in the same context as the Croatians, Zachlumians, and other peoples of Pannonia and Dalmatia.
Constantine VII gives an unlikely derivation of the name from the Latin 'servi', which he explains as 'douloi' (slaves) of Roman emperors. He relates that the Serboi are descended from the "unbaptized" (pagan) Serboi who lived in the place called Boiki near Frankia (Bohemia?), and that they claimed the protection of Emperor Heraclius (reigned 610-641), who settled them in the province of Thessalonica. Constantine's assertion is regarded with some skepticism by modern scholars; since the 19th century it has been commonly held that Serbs came to the Balkan peninsula in the 6th century. Kekaumenos, the 11th century Byzantine general, locates the Serboi on the Sava River (268.28), as does The Chronicle of Nestor, but this is not considered particularly reliable.

The Slavs came to the Balkans from a broad region in central and eastern Europe, which extended from the rivers Elbe in the west to the Dneiper in the east and from a point which touched the Carpathian mountains in the south and the river Niemen in the north. Their settlement in the Balkans appears to have taken place between 610 and 640. Different tribes settled in different parts of the Balkan peninsula, subsequently developing their distinct identities.

A mention of the Serbian name in 680 is about a city of Gordoservon in Asia Minor where "some Slavic tribes" have settled. Gordoservon appears to be a distorted spelling of Grad Srba, "City of Serbs" in Serbian.

The first certain data on the state of the Serboi, Serbia, dates to the 9th century. The episcopal lists of Leo VI mention bishops of Drougoubiteia and the Serbioi. Envoys of the Serboi arrived at the court of the Emperor Basil II, around 993.

In the 11th century there was probably a theme of Serbia: a seal impression of Constantine Diogenes, strategos of Serbia, is preserved. Around 1040 Theophilos Erotikos was the governor of the Serboi until he was expelled by Stefan Voislav, who reportedly conquered the territory of the Serboi and became its 'archon'. T. Wasilewski (1964) surmised that this theme was the same as Sirmium, whereas Dj. Radojcic (1966) thinks that it was Raska, only temporarily governed by the Byzantines.
------------------------

The name Avar is probably of Roman origin and it meant greedy people.
Root / lemma: au̯-7, au̯ē-, au̯ēi-
Meaning: `to like; to help, *desire'
German meaning: `gern haben'; daher einerseits `verlangen', andrerseits `begünstigen, hilfreich sein'
lat. aveō, -ēre (basis au̯ē- as in preceding) ` be eager, have a wild desire, long for, desire ', avidus ` desiring, longing for; esp. greedy for money, avaricious ', avārus ` covetous, greedy ';
The eponym of Croat Hrvat people as they prefer to be called, stemmed probably from the royal title of an Avar tribal leader called Kovrat.
Kubrat (also Kurt, Kovrat, Kobrat, Kuvrat, Kubert, Korbat, Qobrat, Khudbard, Kuvarog, Krovat Kurbat and even Bashtu) was an early Bulgar ruler .
He was of the house of Dulo, Dub or Duba. He was of Avar paternal line, son of Balt-Avar Alburi, and Bulgar maternal line.
Kubrat was endorsed by Khan Sibir as the first king of Onogur , the 2nd Avar dynasty. Under his and his son Bayan's rule, Avaria grew to stretch from the Danube to the Volga rivers. In 619 CE he arrived as hostage in Constantinople and was soon baptized. His maternal uncle Organa (also Organ or Ornag) acted as regent over his tribe the Unogundur until he was old enough to rule. Kubrat established peace with Byzantium , due to his respect for Byzantine culture. He was buried near Poltava (from Balt-Avar, meaning Chief of Avars). His Kurgan was excavated in 1912 .
After Kubrat's death, Bezmer (also called Bezmes Bayan and Batbayan) inherited his rule, but soon other "sons" led factions of the once great empire in secession. The first, called Kotrag after the tribes he led, moved up the Volga to found the state of Great Bulgaria . Then Ultzindur or Balkor led a rebel Kuber tribe into Pannonia only to break away and move south. Atilkese, moved southwest from Ukraine with his horde to join these Bulgars south of the Danube and eventually founded the state of Bulgaria there. Emnetzur, who was based in Pannonia sought refuge from the ensuing chaos for his Altsikurs in the west with the Lombards.
-------------------
List of Bulgarian monarchs:
the two legendary rulers
• Avitokhol
• Irnik

• Gostun
• Organa, regent (? - 619)
the Dulo clan (? - 740, before 808 - 976)
• Kubrat (584-642)
• Benzmer (642-643)
• Asparukh (643-700)
• Tervel (701-718)
• name unknown, Tervel's successor (718-724)
• Sevar (725-740)
the Ukil clan (739-761, 764-766)
• Kormisosh (739-756)
• Vinekh (756-761)
• Subin (764-766)
• Umar (766)
------------
The word Avars can mean:
• The nomadic people that conquered the Hungarian Steppe in the early Middle Ages, the Eurasian Avars.
• The modern people of Caucasus, mainly of Dagestan, Caucasian Avars.
------------------
Bulgars (also Bolgars) a people of Central Asia, probably originally Pamirian, whose branches became slavicized and perhaps Turkic over time. The Turkic etymology most often given for their name is Bulgha meaning mixed, though it might also be from Varkun.
Bolgars moved west from the lower-middle Volga river AD to control the second Avar dynasty of Onoguria (in Ukraine) by the mid-7th century. The group then split into two.
--------------------
Onogur or Onoghur was the name of the European Avar federation spreading from Pannonia to the Kuban during their 2nd Dynasty under the rule of the Bolgar house of Dulo (also Dub or Dubo, of the Unogundur tribe of Bolgars) from 635-685CE. It was during this dynasty that Pannonia came to be known as Hungary by its neighbours. It is most frequently refered to as Great Bulgaria.
-------------------
The Danube (Bulgarian Dunav, German Donau, Greek Ister, Hungarian Duna, Latin Danubius, Romanian Dunărea, Serbian and Croatian Dunav, Slovak Dunaj, Ukrainian Dunay) is the second-longest river in Europe (the Volga being the longest).
It is the only major European river to flow from west to east. It rises in Germany in the Black Forest as two smaller rivers called Brigach and Breg, which join in Donaueschingen and are called Donau henceforth, flowing south-east for a distance of about 2850 km (1770 miles), to the Black Sea in Romania where the Danube Delta is.
----------------------
Constantinople (Roman name: Constantinopolis; Greek: Konstantinoupolis or Κωνσταντινούπολη) is the former name of the city of Istanbul in Turkey. Its original name was Byzantium (Greek: Byzantion or Bυζαντιον.
"Constantinople" is an Anglicization of Konstantinoupolis, which means "City of Constantine." The name is a reference to the Roman emperor of Illyrian descent Constantine I who made it the capital of the Roman Empire on May 11, 330 AD. Constantine named the city Nova Roma (New Rome), but that name never came into common use.
-------------------
Byzantium was an ancient Greek city, founded by colonists from Megara in 667 BC and named after their king Byzantas. The name "Byzantium" is a Latinization of the original Greek name Byzantion (Βυζάντιον).
After siding with Pescennius Niger against the victorious Septimius Severus the city was besieged and suffered extensive damage in AD 186.
-------------------
Poltava is a city and oblast center in the Poltava oblast of eastern Ukraine with some 315,000 inhabitants as of 1989.
The city belonged to Lithuania from the 14th century. Polish administration took over in 1569. In 1667 Poltava became part of Russia.
---------------------
A kurgan is a type of burial mound heaped over a burial chamber, often of wood, that was characteristic of Bronze Age nomadic peoples of the steppes, from the Altai to the Caucasus and Romania. Within the burial chamber at the heart of the kurgan, members of the elite were buried with grave goods and sacrificial offerings, sometimes including horse-sacrifices.
In 1956 Marija Gimbutas introduced her "Kurgan hypothesis" combining archaeology from the distinctive "Kurgan' burial mounds with linguistics to unravel the problem of the origins of Proto-Indo-European (PIE) speaking peoples. She tentatively named the culture "Kurgan" and traced its migrations into Europe. This hypothesis, and the act of bridging the disciplines, has had a significant impact on Indo-European research.
---------------------------------
Bulgaria, called today Volga Bulgaria or İdel Bolğaristan, is a historic state that existed between the 7th and 13th centuries around the confluence of the Volga and Kama Rivers. Today, Tatarstan is considered to be the descendant of Bulgaria (in terms of territory and people).
Bulgaria was founded by Kotrag Khan, son of Kubrat Khan around 660. The capital was Bulgar (Bolğar) city, located 160 km south of the modern city of Kazan, Tatarstan, today Bolğar town.
--------------------------------
Pannonia is an ancient Illyrian country bounded north and east by the Danube, conterminous westward with Noricum and upper Italy, and southward with Illyrian Dalmatia and upper Illyrian Moesia.
Its original inhabitants were the Illyrian Pannonii (sometimes called Paeonii by the Greeks). From the 4th century BC it was invaded by various Celtic tribes. Little is heard of Pannonia until 35 BC, when its inhabitants, allies of the Illyrian Dalmatians, were attacked by Augustus, who conquered and occupied Siscia (Sisak). The country was not, however, definitely subdued until 9 BC, when it was incorporated with Illyria, the frontier of which was thus extended as far as the Danube.
------------------------------------
Ukraine, formerly The Ukraine, is a country in eastern Europe which borders the Black Sea to the south, the Russian Federation to the east, Belarus to the north and Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Moldova to the west. Its name derived from slav. kraina 'country' from earlier:
Proto-Slavic form: krajь
Page in Trubačev: XII 88-89
Old Church Slavic: krai `edge, end'
Russian: kraj `edge, country, land' [m jo]
Czech: kraj `edge, end, region' [m jo]
Slovak: kraj `edge, end, region' [m jo]
Polish: kraj `edge, country, land' [m jo]
Serbo-Croatian: krāj `edge, (dial.) bank, end, beginning' [m jo]
Slovene: kràj `edge, bank, end' [m jo]

--------------------------------------
It is very easy to identify Croats and Serbs as descendants of Avar and Sabar tribes. Avars were very proud of their name. They were so pathologically obsessed with their Avar identity that they added the suffix -ava to every German, Illyrian, or Greek city which they conquered. Of all Mongolian - Turkic savages who scorched Illyria, Thrace and Macedonia, only Huns in Illyrian Pannonia (numerically superior to Slavs) preserved their archaic language, although a huge part of their vocabulary is part of Pannonian substratum.
Although Sabars and Avars lost their ancient non-Indo European language against their Slavic subjects [the same fate suffered by Bulgars in Thrace], they would retain their Avar names.
If that was not enough Avars added the suffix -va, -vic to surnames of their children. Virtually all Serbs, Montenegrins, Croats, Slovenians, Bosnians, Slav Macedonians bear the hallmarks of Sabar, Avar ancestry by adding the Avar formant to their surname.
Albanians are exempt of the Avar custom of adding -va , -vic formant to their surname frequently found among the Slavs. Unfortunately many Illyrian cities in Koso-vo (earlier Dardania), Macedonia, Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro and even in Albania (once invaded by Bulgarians and later Serbs) still bear the infamous Avar -va formant. But no Albanian words share the Avar suffixes. Morphologically speaking the suffix -va is unknown to Albanian dialects which preserve the grammatical code of the ancient Albanoi, an Illyrian dialect.

(vazhdon)

Re: ARTIKUJ TE POKORNY'T

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:46 pm
by ALBPelasgian
The phenomenon of conquering immigrant groups adopting the language of its surrounding subjects takes place when the subjugated population is culturally and numerically superior to their new rulers. The Scandinavian Normans adopted the Romance French language in Normandy, while their ruling kinsmen in England adopted Anglo-Saxon; the Germanic Franks, Merovingians and Carolingians adopted the Romance French language; the Nordic Visigoths adopted the Romance Spanish language; the Germanic Lombards adopted the Romance Italian language, and the Tungus Manchu adopted the Chinese language of their subjects. Slowly Mongol races would blend with Slavs who gained from the alien races not only their Asian name but also the slanted eyes, dark hair and such brutality unknown to mankind. Therefore Croats, Serbs and Bulgarians were those non-Indo European hordes that ravaged Europe but finally were defeated and lost their respective languages against superior Slavs. Yet the Mongolian venom still flowed in their veins as they prepared for the final slaughter - the carnage of one of the oldest Aryan people, the Illyrians.
---------------------------
The Caucasus
A high mountain range extending across the land between the Caspian and Black Seas, this region has collected a tremendously varied number of small enclaves of cultures who have found life on the steppes to the north or the semi-arid plateau regions to the south too inhospitable.
ABASGIA Also known as Abkhazia or Akhazia, it is a mountainous district along the east coast of the Black Sea, to the northeast of Georgia.
Saeristavi of Abkhazia
ANCHABADZE

Meqe artikulli eshte teper i gjate per t'u postuar ndiqni vegezen e meposhtme per lexim te metutjeshem:

http://web.archive.org/web/200801130113 ... /serb.html