"Histori Arkeologjike" e percaktuar nga arkeologu i shquar Robert Ross Holloway
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 3:44 am
"Histori Arkeologjike" e percaktuar nga arkeologu i shquar Robert Ross Holloway(Gold Medal Award for Distinguished Archaeological Achievement - AIA)
Nje artikull ne "Bryn Mawr Classical Review" mbi librin:
- - - - - - - Libri: - - - - - - - - - - - -
R. Ross Holloway, The archaeology of early Rome and Latium
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Po citoj disa perfundime ne te cilat ka arritur autori i artikullit. Ne vijim jane keto perfundime ne artikullin origjinal te autorit.
- - - - Citoj nga artikulli - - --
"Arkeologjia meriton me lart se sa te jete nje paterice e rrefenjave te analeve dhe ndjekesve te ketyre rrefenjave"
. . . konceptimi prej tij i maredhenieve ndermjet arkelogjise dhe tradites eshte per mua . . . thelbesor
. . . mgjse thuhet qe zbulimet arkeologjike "konfirmojne" traditen letrare(rrefenjave), ne fakt ato nuk e konfirmojne . . .
. . . Mjaft me me "arkeologjia si mjet" i konfirmimit dhe pranimit si te vertete te tradites letrare(shkrimeve historike tradicionale)!
. . . Ne kapitullin "konkluzione", autori synon te " te ktheje arkeologjine ne histori"(fleta 11).
. . . Lexuesi do te mesoje se ne kete "histori arkeologjike" te fillesave(origjines) zor se gjendet ndonje lidhje me shkrimet e "Livy"-t dhe te "Dionysius of Halicarnassus ".
. . . "Tradicionalistet", pra ata qe vazhdimisht dhe pa kufi, interpretojne zbulimet arkeologjike ne mbeshtetje te plote te vertetesise globale te shkrimeve te hershme(ancient), mund te ndihen keq nga kjo, por edhe ne fushen e historise, nje perballje me te verteten eshte me e keshillueshme.
( vijon origjinali . . . )
= = = = = Rreth librit te R. Ross Holloway, citoj nga artikulli origjinal : https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1995/1995.03.08 = = = = =
- - - - - - - Libri: - - - - - - - - - - - -
R. Ross Holloway, The archaeology of early Rome and Latium
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“Archaeology deserves better than to remain a crutch for the tales of the annalists and their followers”
. . . his conception of the relations between archaeology and tradition has struck me . . . as fundamental.
. . . though it is said that archaeological discoveries “confirm” the literary tradition, they actually do not . . .
. . . Enough of archaeology as a means of confirming and authenticating the literary tradition!
. . . In his concluding chapter (pp. 165-173), the author attempts “to turn archaeology into history” (p. 11).
. . . The reader will find out that this “archaeological history” of the primordia has scarcely any links with the records of Livy and of Dionysius of Halicarnassus
. . . The “traditionalists”, i.e. the ones who systematically and excessively interpret archaeological discoveries in full confidence of the global historicity of ancient records, might be somewhat upset, but in the field of history too, a face to face confrontation with the truth is much more advisable.
= = = = = =
https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1995/1995.03.08
Bryn Mawr Classical Review
Archaeology of Early Rome and Latium (II)
R. Ross Holloway, The archaeology of early Rome and Latium. New York: Routledge, 1994. xx, 203 pages. ISBN 9780415080651
Review by
Jacques Poucet, Universite de Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)
---------------------------
R. Ross Holloway— 1995, - AIA(Archaeological Institute of America) - Gold Medal Award for Distinguished Archaeological Achievement.
Holloway's recognition of the significance of traditionally underappreciated indigenous cultures within the wider milieu of trans-italian and trans-Mediterranean contacthas provided a framework within which many later studies have been situated.
Today, such thinking is central to innumerable discussions of economic, demographic and social complexity of the Mediterranean.
-----------------
"Histori Arkeologjike" e percaktuar nga arkeologu i shquar Robert Ross Holloway.
Nje artikull ne "Bryn Mawr Classical Review" mbi librin:
- - - - - - - Libri: - - - - - - - - - - - -
R. Ross Holloway, The archaeology of early Rome and Latium
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Po citoj disa perfundime ne te cilat ka arritur autori i artikullit. Ne vijim jane keto perfundime ne artikullin origjinal te autorit.
- - - - Citoj nga artikulli - - --
"Arkeologjia meriton me lart se sa te jete nje paterice e rrefenjave te analeve dhe ndjekesve te ketyre rrefenjave"
. . . konceptimi prej tij i maredhenieve ndermjet arkelogjise dhe tradites eshte per mua . . . thelbesor
. . . mgjse thuhet qe zbulimet arkeologjike "konfirmojne" traditen letrare(rrefenjave), ne fakt ato nuk e konfirmojne . . .
. . . Mjaft me me "arkeologjia si mjet" i konfirmimit dhe pranimit si te vertete te tradites letrare(shkrimeve historike tradicionale)!
. . . Ne kapitullin "konkluzione", autori synon te " te ktheje arkeologjine ne histori"(fleta 11).
. . . Lexuesi do te mesoje se ne kete "histori arkeologjike" te fillesave(origjines) zor se gjendet ndonje lidhje me shkrimet e "Livy"-t dhe te "Dionysius of Halicarnassus ".
. . . "Tradicionalistet", pra ata qe vazhdimisht dhe pa kufi, interpretojne zbulimet arkeologjike ne mbeshtetje te plote te vertetesise globale te shkrimeve te hershme(ancient), mund te ndihen keq nga kjo, por edhe ne fushen e historise, nje perballje me te verteten eshte me e keshillueshme.
( vijon origjinali . . . )
= = = = = Rreth librit te R. Ross Holloway, citoj nga artikulli origjinal : https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1995/1995.03.08 = = = = =
- - - - - - - Libri: - - - - - - - - - - - -
R. Ross Holloway, The archaeology of early Rome and Latium
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“Archaeology deserves better than to remain a crutch for the tales of the annalists and their followers”
. . . his conception of the relations between archaeology and tradition has struck me . . . as fundamental.
. . . though it is said that archaeological discoveries “confirm” the literary tradition, they actually do not . . .
. . . Enough of archaeology as a means of confirming and authenticating the literary tradition!
. . . In his concluding chapter (pp. 165-173), the author attempts “to turn archaeology into history” (p. 11).
. . . The reader will find out that this “archaeological history” of the primordia has scarcely any links with the records of Livy and of Dionysius of Halicarnassus
. . . The “traditionalists”, i.e. the ones who systematically and excessively interpret archaeological discoveries in full confidence of the global historicity of ancient records, might be somewhat upset, but in the field of history too, a face to face confrontation with the truth is much more advisable.
= = = = = =
https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1995/1995.03.08
Bryn Mawr Classical Review
Archaeology of Early Rome and Latium (II)
R. Ross Holloway, The archaeology of early Rome and Latium. New York: Routledge, 1994. xx, 203 pages. ISBN 9780415080651
Review by
Jacques Poucet, Universite de Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)
---------------------------
R. Ross Holloway— 1995, - AIA(Archaeological Institute of America) - Gold Medal Award for Distinguished Archaeological Achievement.
Holloway's recognition of the significance of traditionally underappreciated indigenous cultures within the wider milieu of trans-italian and trans-Mediterranean contacthas provided a framework within which many later studies have been situated.
Today, such thinking is central to innumerable discussions of economic, demographic and social complexity of the Mediterranean.
-----------------
"Histori Arkeologjike" e percaktuar nga arkeologu i shquar Robert Ross Holloway.