Syndrome Etymology.
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:06 am
Syndrome Etymology.
The great Greco-Roman Syndrome. It must be in fact Syndron that means “blink the eyes”. Why the name “sy” is in the singular and the verb “ndrome” is in the plural form? It should be “ndron”. Sy ndron.
"a number of symptoms occurring together," 1540s, from Mod.L., from Gk. syndrome "concurrence of symptoms, concourse," from syndromos, lit. "running together," from syn- "with" + dromos "running, course." Psychological sense is from 1955.
What does “running together” mean?
What does “blink our eyes” mean? Running them together??????
I told you that the language is much more complicated. It’s not the fabrication etymology that you know and the Greco-Roman syndrome that explains everything. In fact, they both explain nothing about other languages. Excluding the others was a great mistake of the manipulators.
The Greco-Roman syndrome it’s a problem that still leads some people to assume that the other people are subhuman and the other languages are imperfect. If they are, they are because of the Greek or Latin. It is simply a question of eyes. How you see.
What is that “sii”. Is it a name or a verb?
It must be simultaneously a name “sii=sy” and a verb "shih”, but not whatever the Greco-Roman Syndrome wants. The language science has nothing to do with the idiot Syndromes.
The great Greco-Roman Syndrome. It must be in fact Syndron that means “blink the eyes”. Why the name “sy” is in the singular and the verb “ndrome” is in the plural form? It should be “ndron”. Sy ndron.
"a number of symptoms occurring together," 1540s, from Mod.L., from Gk. syndrome "concurrence of symptoms, concourse," from syndromos, lit. "running together," from syn- "with" + dromos "running, course." Psychological sense is from 1955.
What does “running together” mean?
What does “blink our eyes” mean? Running them together??????
I told you that the language is much more complicated. It’s not the fabrication etymology that you know and the Greco-Roman syndrome that explains everything. In fact, they both explain nothing about other languages. Excluding the others was a great mistake of the manipulators.
The Greco-Roman syndrome it’s a problem that still leads some people to assume that the other people are subhuman and the other languages are imperfect. If they are, they are because of the Greek or Latin. It is simply a question of eyes. How you see.
What is that “sii”. Is it a name or a verb?
It must be simultaneously a name “sii=sy” and a verb "shih”, but not whatever the Greco-Roman Syndrome wants. The language science has nothing to do with the idiot Syndromes.